Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.
Promoting CAADP Mutual Accountability Through the
Biennial Reviews Process
Greenwell Matchaya, PhD
Senior Economics Resear...
INTRODUCTION
The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP)
 Key Africa’s policy framework for agric...
Adapted from AUC 2020, https://au.int/en/caadp/toolkit
Under the Commitment to Mutual Accountability to Actions and Results (7)
 African Leaders committed to a systematic regu...
CONTINENTAL PERFORMANCE IN 2017 AND 2019
Adapted from AUC 2020, https://au.int/en/caadp/toolkit
MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ACTIONS AND RESULTS

Adapted from AUC 2020, https://au.int/en/caadp/toolkit
 Technical leadership- with AUC/NEPAD and partners: Leads the development of
methods for the reviews etc
 eBR developmen...
BR PROCESS CHALLENGES NOTED I
 Data Issues in all Countries: The data availability and quality challenges
continue to aff...
BR PROCESS CHALLENGES NOTED II
 Weak Data Standards and Protocols: Some countries continue to have weak data
standards an...
LESSONS LEARNT I
 Countries with relatively stronger data systems in some cases reported better
 Formation of Cluster Gr...
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT I
 Complete the CAADP processes
 Domestication of the Malabo Declaration and targets into NA...
SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT II
 Integrate the BR data collection process into existing national and regional
systems to e...
 Countries need to report their performance again in 2021
 This report will cover the period 2020 -2021
 The final road...
 Training of country experts – February 2021
 Country data Collection and validation – March/June 2021
 Data valuation ...
Prochain SlideShare
Chargement dans…5
×

2020 ReSAKSS Annual Conference - Plenary Session VI Progress Toward Achieving CAADP Goals

Presentation on "CAADP Mutual Accountability Through the Biennial Reviews Process" by Greenwell Matchaya, IWMI-ReSAKSS Southern Africa Coordinator

Livres associés

Gratuit avec un essai de 30 jours de Scribd

Tout voir

Livres audio associés

Gratuit avec un essai de 30 jours de Scribd

Tout voir
  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

2020 ReSAKSS Annual Conference - Plenary Session VI Progress Toward Achieving CAADP Goals

  1. 1. Promoting CAADP Mutual Accountability Through the Biennial Reviews Process Greenwell Matchaya, PhD Senior Economics Researcher & ReSAKSS-SA Coordinator International Water Management Institute Pretoria g.Matchaya@cigar.org
  2. 2. INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP)  Key Africa’s policy framework for agriculture development and transformation since 2003.  Focuses on reducing poverty and increasing food security and nutrition.  The 2014 Malabo Declaration on Agricultural Transformation added focus areas to the CAADP. oThe Malabo Declaration is an agricultural transformation agenda owith commitments and targets in 7 thematic areas:
  3. 3. Adapted from AUC 2020, https://au.int/en/caadp/toolkit
  4. 4. Under the Commitment to Mutual Accountability to Actions and Results (7)  African Leaders committed to a systematic regular review process of the progress made  in implementing the provisions of the Declaration using the CAADP Results Framework  (a) to conduct a biennial Agricultural Review Process that involves tracking, monitoring and reporting on progress  AU developed AATS based on 43 indicators for the 1st BR and 47 indicators for the 2nd BR.  Results presentation is not a focus of this session but some highlights on country performance in the BR1 and BR2 are as below: INTRODUCTION II
  5. 5. CONTINENTAL PERFORMANCE IN 2017 AND 2019 Adapted from AUC 2020, https://au.int/en/caadp/toolkit
  6. 6. MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ACTIONS AND RESULTS  Adapted from AUC 2020, https://au.int/en/caadp/toolkit
  7. 7.  Technical leadership- with AUC/NEPAD and partners: Leads the development of methods for the reviews etc  eBR development and deployment with AUC/NEPAD and partners  Support to countries to resolve emerging technical issues  Work with RECs, AUC/NEPAD and partners to review submitted reports  Technical leadership in trainings of country experts  Leading the development of briefs and materials for dissemination  Contributes to concepts development in this area ROLE OF RESAKSS I
  8. 8. BR PROCESS CHALLENGES NOTED I  Data Issues in all Countries: The data availability and quality challenges continue to affect the BR process even in the second round of reporting.  Some of the BR Indicators are Not routinely collected by National systems. There is a need to mainstream the BR indicators in routine data collection at national level  Assessment of the Inaugural BR: a majority of the countries did not conduct an assessment of the 1st BR to identify areas that need improvement in the 2nd BR.  This may have contributed to hence the low performance of in some cases
  9. 9. BR PROCESS CHALLENGES NOTED II  Weak Data Standards and Protocols: Some countries continue to have weak data standards and protocols. As such, quality, accuracy, traceability and verification of data are compromised.  BR Processes at country levels not fully inclusive: In some cases, countries still do not have an elaborate BR process. It should be popularized more –expand BR teams  Reports Validation challenges: With both the 1st and 2nd BR Processes, some countries have not held a robust validation workshop/meeting.  Need further studies in areas of post harvest losses and women empowerment to generate initial data at country level
  10. 10. LESSONS LEARNT I  Countries with relatively stronger data systems in some cases reported better  Formation of Cluster Groups: Member States at national level which created Cluster Groups to align to the seven (7) Malabo Declaration Commitments improved reporting rates  The REC Secretariats and ReSAKSS technical team BR Meeting: This meeting is vital in improving the quality of Member States BR reports and also enhancing the reporting rates.  eBR helped with reporting and analysis and minimized errors in indicator computations. Shows usefulness of ICT in this process  Development of BR Work Plans/Roadmaps: The roadmaps/plans developed during country trainings assisted Member states to preparations.  Assessment of previous BR as part of preparation for future BR was useful
  11. 11. SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT I  Complete the CAADP processes  Domestication of the Malabo Declaration and targets into NAIPs.  Integrate the Malabo Commitments into National Agriculture Investment Plans (NAIPS) and ensure effective implementation  Build capacity for evidence-based agricultural policy-making and programing by making the Biennial Review process a part of regional and national decision systems.  Convene national dialogues to reflect on and discuss the results of this Biennial Review report
  12. 12. SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT II  Integrate the BR data collection process into existing national and regional systems to ease data collection.  CAADP in general and the BR process in particular, requires stronger political leadership and commitment  Link the BR to policies and programs, and use it to trigger changes at country level  Strengthening country level data systems in general  Broadly communicate BR findings, and enhance the visibility of the BR
  13. 13.  Countries need to report their performance again in 2021  This report will cover the period 2020 -2021  The final roadmap will be shared by AUC at CAADP PP –Nov 2020  Critical Analysis of BR II process by Theme- November 2020  Malabo Policy Learning event- 23-24 November 2020  CAADP PP meeting – November 25-27 2020  Permanent Secretaries Retreat- Date :TBC  Revision of Technical documents for BR III- Dec 2020-Jan 2021  Training of Trainers (Virtual)- January 2021 DRAFT BIENNIAL REVIEW III ROADMAP I
  14. 14.  Training of country experts – February 2021  Country data Collection and validation – March/June 2021  Data valuation at REC level- July 2021  Final submission using eBR July 2021  Data Cleaning and feedback to countries- July/August 2021  Write-shop –August 2021  Presentation to Heads of State- Jan 2022 DRAFT BIENNIAL REVIEW III ROADMAP II

    Soyez le premier à commenter

Presentation on "CAADP Mutual Accountability Through the Biennial Reviews Process" by Greenwell Matchaya, IWMI-ReSAKSS Southern Africa Coordinator

Vues

Nombre de vues

60

Sur Slideshare

0

À partir des intégrations

0

Nombre d'intégrations

0

Actions

Téléchargements

8

Partages

0

Commentaires

0

Mentions J'aime

0

×