3. US Research Institutions and Industry Rhetoric Political Experts History Triple Helix and the Entrepreneurial University Shared Goals and Complementary Strengths
4. IRB Collaboration and Enhancement Human Subjects Research Enhancement Program Sponsored by National Institutes of Health John E. Fogarty International Center 12 months, $50,000 Objectives Develop sustainable electronic systems, procedures and communication methods Increase administrative, scientific, socio-cultural and ethical competencies of IRB members through joint workshops, short-term exchange and training activities Create sustainable research ethics training courses for global health researchers
5. IRB Collaboration and Enhancement Projects Specific needs determined in partnership with developing country ethics review committee IRB training, investigator training, best practices, systems Benefits of Participation Improve Ethical Review Committee competencies Address critical barriers in review Reduce review time Increase Investigator knowledge of research integrity requirements Improved protocols require less time to review and approve Develop knowledge leaders in research integrity
7. EDICT The Eliminating Disparities in Clinical Trials Project 2005-2009 Clinical Trials Navigation Community Health Worker/Promotora Promotora de Salud Health promoter Bridge between communities and external systems Social and cultural knowledge Proven model Training and certification
8. Microfinance Industry Purpose Give poor people access to credit, ultimately alleviating poverty Types of MFIs Commercial banks Microfinance banks Microfinance NGOs Regulated and unregulated Types of Lenders Groups Individuals
22. Benefits and Obstacles Obstacles Communities of devastating poverty Unreliable social infrastructure Raises Significant Ethical questions Vulnerable population Ability to comprehend consent Subject to undue influence or coercion? Weak ethical oversight
25. Continuing Improvement toward Operational Excellence Client Client Client Local Management Analyzing, objectives, indicators Measurement Improvement 4QY 4QNY Satisfaction Satisfaction Output Input Product processing Needs MYR Quality Management Team Activities that add value Information workflow 16 | 4th Latin America Clinical Trials Congress| US – Miami 25 -26 Feb 10 | Quality in Clinical Research | B. Funes | Business Use Only
26. QualityOversight Quality Assurance (QA) is fault prevention through process design and auditing and ensuring appropriate control steps are followed -Creating processes, procedures, tools, etc. to prevent faults from occurring -Examples: Templates, checklists, guides, SOPs Quality Control (QC) is fault/failure detection through static and/or routine testing -Examining against pre-determined standards and criteria to measure conformance -Examples: Periodic Self Assessments, Quality Plan, peer reviews, business walkthrough
27. Whatis a Quality Plan Define your Quality Goals (Process & Metrics) Selects appropriate detection and prevention methods Analyze and be realistic about where defects come from (Root/Cause) Establish a formal in-process and inter-process review & checks Establish a Training (Lessons Learned, sharing Best Practices, Quality Management mindset and change culture) Establish a Failure mode analysis (frequency of errors, criticality) Determine Costs of failure, rework, repair, waste, complaint resolution, product return and replacement Establish a Help line support
28. Supervision of the Conduct of Clinical Investigation What is Appropriate Delegation of Study related Tasks? What is adequate Training? What is adequate Supervision of the Conduct of an Ongoing Clinical Trial? What are an Investigator’s Responsibilities for Oversightof Other Parties involved in the Conduct of a Clinical Trial?
29. Protecting the Rights, Safety, and Welfare of Study Subject Reasonable Medical Care Needed by Participation in a Clinical Trial Reasonable Access to Medical Care Protocol Violations that Present Unreasonable Risks
34. Outsourcing in Clinical Research R&D – Importance For Country New treatments, new concepts, improve life expectancy, investments, drive scientific development growth, technological development For Patients Access to high technology and treatment, improve survival, improve quality of life For Professionals Scientific development, right use of drugs, international exposure For Sponsors Add and create value to the companies, drive the business growth, introduce new drugs and concepts, adequate life cycle management of products
35.
36. R&D costs have increased and the new products approved reduced
For this grant application, the focus is really creating a partnership between 2 ethical review committees, one in a developing country and one at a US institution. The reasoning behind this is twofold:Bureaucratic – the funding comes from ARRA and in order to use them as a funding source, the focus of the grant must be to accelerate the speed of research through IRB collaboration.Limited Funds – This is viewed as a pilot project to develop relationships between IRBs which can be built upon in the future and used for larger grant opportunities.Although the justification for this funding opportunity comes from the Federal requirement that NIH supported investigators must obtain ethical approval at both the US and foreign institutions, any improvements in the ethical review process will benefit all research sponsors.
Developing country as defined by World Bank (according to Gross National Income per capita as “low income” “lower middle income” and “upper middle income”
Launched in 2005, the EDICT Project was developed to design practical and realizable policy solutions to disparities in clinical trial participation. The community health worker or promotora model is used becausepromotoras are effective communicators and may act as the bridge between external systems and the community they serve. They may act as change agents within their naturally occurring social networks. Serving as a bridge promotoras are able to break through barriers to participation in clinical trials based upon our experience in the US. For examples, many populations do not turn to health care professionals for health information but seek out authority figures in their own social network. This also contributes to the lack of knowledge of the existence of clinical trials within the community.Promotora services are delivered for the most part through home visits and group presentations. Promotoras go where people congregate; health fairs, church, neighborhood meetings, factories gas stations, grocery stores.This model has been used successfully for decades as an approach to reducing disparities in health status and health care access in the US.Many states in the US have certification programs and the CHW/Promotora is recognized job classification by the US Dept. of Labor.
The Microfinance Industry became active in Latin America in the 1990s and even more so in the early 2000sThe MFI industry includes small short-term loans, insurance, banking products, Microcredit in the true sense of the term, always enables the borrower to create wealth.
Each Loan Officer has approximately 10-20 Trust Groups they work with or on average about 200 clients at one time.Within the Trust Group is where the action is. Basic business education plus health education, discussion on social and public health issues as well.For many MFIs, the majority of staff is native to the local community in which they work.Investment It varies from country to country but between 60-80% of all clients are women.
Typically, MFIs operate in places where it is difficult to conduct research.Geographically isolatedPolitically unstableTechnologically backwardEducationally disadvantagedHowever, MFIs working in these countries focus on teaching entrepreneurs the following topics:Cash flow (control, management); financial literacy (budgeting, profit); value chain (suppliers, customers)So if they are able to understand these topics, then they should be able to comprehend issues such as experimental, consent, etc..
Deviation in just a few centers can invalidate/change the results of an entire trial (as patient data is excluded), jeopardizing submissions (or even existing approvals if issues are found very late)Such events potentially have widespread reputational and credibility impact in the public domain Even in cases where problems are discovered relatively early, the resource and time spent in remediation far out-weighs that which would be expended in “getting it right the first time”