Henrique Dantas - API fuzzing using Swagger

•

0 j'aime•1,066 vues

DevSecCon

DevSecCon London 2016

Présentations et discours publics

Join the conversation #devseccon
Henrique Dantas
@hndantas
API fuzzing
using Swagger

Why API sec testing?
Public
Close to DB model
Ubiquitous
Business driver
Agility
https://flic.kr/p/5oTsVq

Solution
Automation
Reporting
Integration
https://flic.kr/p/bxwAxk

Python lib
Extensive and extendible
OSS
Popular
Contains all meta-data
Machine Readable
Swagger & Sulley

Join the conversation #devseccon
Now, your turn :)
/hdantas/fuzz

Join the conversation #devseccon
● APIs are good targets
● Leverage existing specs for sec testing
● Automate, Automate, Automate
@hndantas
henrique@restsecured.xyz

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Are you struggling with application security testing? Do you wish it was easier, faster, and better? Join us to learn more about IAST, a next-generation application security tool that provides highly accurate, real-time vulnerability results without the need for application or source code scans. Learn how this nondisruptive tool can: Run in the background and report vulnerabilities during functional testing, CI/CD, and QA activities. Auto verify, prioritize and triage vulnerability findings in real time with 100% confidence. Fully automate secure app delivery and deployment, without the need for extra security scans or processes. Free up DevOps resources to focus on strategic or mission-critical tasks and contributions.

Bridging the Security Testing Gap in Your CI/CD Pipeline

DevOps.com

DevSecCon London 2017: when good containers go bad by Tim Mackey

DevSecCon

Integrating DevOps and Security

Stijn Muylle

Ast in CI/CD by Ofer Maor

DevSecCon

DevSecCon Asia 2017 Ofer Maor: AppSec DevOps automation – real world cases

DevSecCon

Enforce compliance policy with model-driven automation

Puppet

Secure Your Code Implement DevSecOps in Azure

kloia

DevSecOps: essential tooling to enable continuous security 2019-09-16

Rich Mills

Code Quality - Security

sedukull

Security testing is an important part of any security development life-cycle (SDLC) and, thus, should be a part of any software development life-cycle. We will present SAP's Security Testing Strategy that enables developers to find security vulnerabilities early by applying a variety of different security testing methods and tools. We explain the motivation behind it, how we enable global development teams to implement the strategy, across different SDLCs and report on our experiences.

Bringing Security Testing to Development: How to Enable Developers to Act as ...

Achim D. Brucker

While DevOps is becoming a new norm for most of the companies, security is typically still behind. The new architectures create a number of new process considerations and technical issues. In this practical talk, we will present an overview of the practical issues that go into making security a part of DevOps processes. Will cover incorporating security into existing CI/CD pipelines and tools DevOps professionals need to know to implement the automation and adhere to secure coding practices. Join Stepan Ilyin, Chief Product Officer at Wallarm for an engaging conversation where you’ll learn: Methodologies and tooling for dynamic and static security testing Composite and OSS license analysis benefits Secrets and analysis and secrets management approaches in distributed applications Security automation and integration in CI/CD Apps, APIs and workloads protection in cloud-native K8s enabled environments

Security in CI/CD Pipelines: Tips for DevOps Engineers

DevOps.com

DevSecOps-OWASP Indonesia Day 2017

Suman Sourav

AWS live hack: Atlassian + Snyk OSS on AWS

Eric Smalling

Aleksei Dremin - Application Security Pipeline - phdays9

Alexey Dremin

Designing a secure DevOps workflow is tough: Developers, testers, IT security teams, and managers all have different control points within the software development lifecycle. Additionally, each application in development and production has a unique profile and features. Then you have the different types of organizations which have different maturity levels and needs: Retail has different day-to-day priorities than Finance or Healthcare, although all industries are united by a need to defend against the current threat landscape of data breaches and ransomware. How do you find the right touch points? How do you build application security into your DevOps workflow successfully, turning the workflow from a process into a program?

Take Control: Design a Complete DevSecOps Program

Deborah Schalm

Application Security at DevOps Speed - DevOpsDays Singapore 2016

Stefan Streichsbier

DevSecOps - The big picture

Stefan Streichsbier

All organizations want to go faster and decrease friction in their cloud software delivery pipeline. Infosec has an opportunity to change their classic approach from blocker to enabler. This talk will discuss hallmarks of CI/CD and some practical examples for adding security testing across different organizations. The talk will cover emergent patterns, practices and toolchains that bring security to the table. Presented at OWASP NoVA, Sept 25th, 2018

DevSecOps and the CI/CD Pipeline

James Wickett

AllDayDevOps 2019 AppSensor

jtmelton

DevSecOps | DevOps Sec

Rubal Jain

Tendances (20)

Bridging the Security Testing Gap in Your CI/CD Pipeline

DevSecCon London 2017: when good containers go bad by Tim Mackey

Integrating DevOps and Security

Ast in CI/CD by Ofer Maor

DevSecCon Asia 2017 Ofer Maor: AppSec DevOps automation – real world cases

Enforce compliance policy with model-driven automation

Secure Your Code Implement DevSecOps in Azure

DevSecOps: essential tooling to enable continuous security 2019-09-16

Code Quality - Security

Bringing Security Testing to Development: How to Enable Developers to Act as ...

Security in CI/CD Pipelines: Tips for DevOps Engineers

DevSecOps-OWASP Indonesia Day 2017

AWS live hack: Atlassian + Snyk OSS on AWS

Aleksei Dremin - Application Security Pipeline - phdays9

Take Control: Design a Complete DevSecOps Program

Application Security at DevOps Speed - DevOpsDays Singapore 2016

DevSecOps - The big picture

DevSecOps and the CI/CD Pipeline

AllDayDevOps 2019 AppSensor

DevSecOps | DevOps Sec

En vedette

Colin Domoney -

DevSecCon

Detection, Response and the Azazel Rootkit

Threat Stack

D1T3-Anto-Joseph-Droid-FF

Anthony Jose

The Python bites your apple

Qidan He

This presentation shows that code coverage guided fuzzing is possible in the context of network daemon fuzzing. Some fuzzers are blackbox while others are protocol aware. Even ones which are made protocol aware, fuzzer writers typically model the protocol specification and implement packet awareness logic in the fuzzer. Unfortunately, just because the fuzzer is protocol aware, it does not guarantee that sufficient code paths have been reached. The presentation deals with specific scenarios where the target protocol is completely unknown (proprietary) and no source code or protocol specs are accessible. The tool developed builds a feedback loop between the client and the server components using the concept of "gate functions". A gate function triggers monitoring. The pintool component tracks the binary code coverage for all the functions untill it reaches an exit gate. By instrumenting such gated functions, the tool is able to measure code coverage during packet processing.

BSides LV 2016 - Beyond the tip of the iceberg - fuzzing binary protocols for...

Alexandre Moneger

What the fuzz

Christopher Frenz

Graphic drivers and their related code are an essential component in every modern operating system. This particular component involves especially complex logic and a huge amount of code, simply because it must handle equally complex tasks. As we know from history and experience huge and complex code is often also a security risk. Last but not least, in almost all the popular modern operating system, graphics code and logic is running in a highly privileged context such as the kernel, or even in a higher context, such as VMWare graphics component, which essentially implements your graphic card outside the guest into a host process. Any mistake made into this highly privileged code can lead to a fatal outcome, especially considering that it is often reachable from interesting sandboxes, such as the browser ones. We will go through the internals for various graphic systems, to show similarities and differences, such as windows heart of graphics aka win32k, then OSX/iOS IOKit, and finally, WMWare emulated GPU graphic subsystem. We can then switch gear and showcase some vulnerabilities in these scenarios, discuss effective fuzzing methodologies both specific to a particular target and generic principles of fuzzing graphic subsystems as well.

50 Shades of Fuzzing by Peter Hlavaty & Marco Grassi

Shakacon

The Cyber Grand Challenge (CGC) was announced in 2013--a first-of-its-kind competition in which fully autonomous systems would compete in a Capture The Flag (CTF) tournament. Starting from over 100 teams consisting of some of the top security researchers and hackers in the world, only 7 teams qualified to the final round. These 7 teams competed against eachother to guard their own software with IDS rules and software patches while attacking the other systems. All of this was done without access to program source code nor access to humans. This never-before-seen level of autonomy demonstrated the state of the art in areas of computer security including static analysis, automated bug finding, automatic exploit generation, and automatic software patching. Over the course of just 10 hours, these systems competed to analyze over 80 totally new pieces of software, showing capabilities beyond what anyone has ever seen before. In this talk we will discuss the Cyber Grand Challenge, explaining what it entailed, what the results mean, and how these advances will influence software security in the near future. Additionally, we will share lessons learned from the winning CGC team, and take a look at the future of automatic software analysis. --- Tyler Nighswander Tyler has been a computer hacker for several years. While an undergraduate student at Carnegie Mellon University, Tyler was one of the initial members of the hacking team known as the Plaid Parliament of Pwning. This team rose from a small group of students to the number one competitive hacking team in the world. After traveling around the world competing in hacking competitions, Tyler settled down and now works on making humans and computers think more like hackers at ForAllSecure. In 2016, the automated system he helped create won the DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge.

[CB16] About the cyber grand challenge: the world’s first all-machine hacking...

CODE BLUE

Alfredo Reino - Monitoring aws and azure

DevSecCon

SmartphoneHacking_Android_Exploitation

Malachi Jones

Simon Bennetts - Automating ZAP

DevSecCon

Bug Hunting with Media Formats

Russell Sanford

American Fuzzy Lop

Michael Overmeyer

Discovering Vulnerabilities For Fun and Profit

Abhisek Datta

The Nightmare Fuzzing Suite and Blind Code Coverage Fuzzer

Joxean Koret

Past few years our team was focusing on different operating systems including Microsoft windows kernel. Honestly our first pwn at Windows kernel was not that challenging. Number of available targets with friendly environment for straightforward pwn, from user up to reliable kernel code execution. However, step by step, security policies continue to evolve, and it becomes more troublesome to choose ideal attack surface from various sandboxes. In addition, what steps to follow for digging security holes is highly dependent upon the chosen target. In general, a few common strategies are available for researchers to choose: e.g choose “unknown” one which hasn’t been researched before; Select well fuzzed or well audited one, or research on kernel module internals to find “hidden” attack surfaces which are not explicitly interconnected. In the first part of the talk we introduce our methodology of selecting, alongside with cost of tricks around to choose seemingly banned targets, illustrated by notable examples. After getting hands on potential bug available from targeted sandbox, it is time for Microsoft windows taking hardening efforts to put attacker into corner. Strong mitigations are being introduced more frequently than ever, with promising direction which cuts lots of attack surface off, and a several exploitation techniques being killed. We will show difficulties of developing universal exploitation techniques, and demonstrate needed technical level depending on code quality of target. We will examine how different it becomes with era of Redstone and following versions even with those techniques and good vulnerability in hand. How it changed attacker landscape and how it will (and will not) kill those techniques and applications. However will it really change the game or not?

You didnt see it’s coming? "Dawn of hardened Windows Kernel"

Peter Hlavaty

Assessing the security posture of a web application is a common project for a penetration tester and a good skill for developers to know. In this talk, We’ll go over the different stages of a web application pen test, from start to finish. We’ll start with tools used during the discovery phase to utilize OSINT sources such as search engines, sub-domain brute-forcing and other methods to help you get a good idea of targets “footprint”, automated scanners and their use, all the way to manual testing and tools used for fuzzing parameters to find potential SQL injection vulnerabilities. We’ll also discuss pro-tips and tricks that we use while conducting a full application penetration assessment. After this talk, you should have a good understanding of what is needed as well as where to start on your journey to hacking web apps.

Hacking Web Apps by Brent White

EC-Council

High Definition Fuzzing; Exploring HDMI vulnerabilities

E Hacking

Beyond Automated Testing - RVAsec 2016

Andrew McNicol

Pentesting RESTful WebServices v1.0

n|u - The Open Security Community

En vedette (20)

Colin Domoney -

Detection, Response and the Azazel Rootkit

D1T3-Anto-Joseph-Droid-FF

The Python bites your apple

BSides LV 2016 - Beyond the tip of the iceberg - fuzzing binary protocols for...

What the fuzz

50 Shades of Fuzzing by Peter Hlavaty & Marco Grassi

[CB16] About the cyber grand challenge: the world’s first all-machine hacking...

Alfredo Reino - Monitoring aws and azure

SmartphoneHacking_Android_Exploitation

Simon Bennetts - Automating ZAP

Bug Hunting with Media Formats

American Fuzzy Lop

Discovering Vulnerabilities For Fun and Profit

The Nightmare Fuzzing Suite and Blind Code Coverage Fuzzer

You didnt see it’s coming? "Dawn of hardened Windows Kernel"

Hacking Web Apps by Brent White

High Definition Fuzzing; Exploring HDMI vulnerabilities

Beyond Automated Testing - RVAsec 2016

Pentesting RESTful WebServices v1.0

Plus de DevSecCon

Xavier Garceau-Aranda Senior Security Consultant at NCC Group With the steady rise of cloud adoption, a number of organizations find themselves splitting their resources between multiple cloud providers. While the readiness to deal with security in cloud native environments has been improving, the multi-cloud paradigm poses new challenges. The workshop will aim to familiarize attendees with Scout Suite (https://github.com/nccgroup/ScoutSuite), a key component of NCC Group’s cloud agnostic approach to security assurance. Scout Suite is an open source multi-cloud security-auditing tool, which enables security posture assessment of cloud environments. Using the APIs exposed by cloud providers, Scout Suite gathers configuration data for manual inspection and highlights risk areas. Rather than pouring through dozens of pages on the web consoles, Scout Suite provides a clear view of the attack surface automatically. The following cloud providers are currently supported: - Amazon Web Services - Microsoft Azure - Google Cloud Platform - Oracle Cloud Infrastructure - Alibaba Cloud During the workshop, attendees will leverage Scout Suite to assess a number of cloud environments designed to simulate typical flaws. We will display how the tool can be leveraged to quickly identify and help with remediation of security misconfigurations.

DevSecCon London 2019: Workshop: Cloud Agnostic Security Testing with Scout S...

DevSecCon

Mitun Zavery Senior Engineer at Sonatype Bad actors have recognized the power of open source and are now beginning to create their own attack opportunities. This new form of assault, where OSS project credentials are compromised and malicious code is intentionally injected into open source libraries, allows hackers to poison the well. In this session, Mitun will explain how both security and developers must work together to stop this trend. Or, risk losing the entire open source ecosystem. Analyze, and detail, the events leading to today’s “all-out” attack on the OSS industry Define what the future of open source looks like in today’s new normal Outline how developers can step into the role of security, to protect themselves, and the millions of people depending on them

DevSecCon London 2019: Are Open Source Developers Security’s New Front Line?

DevSecCon

Jan Harrie Security Analyst at ERNW GmbH OpenShift by Red Hat is one of the major Platform as a Service (PaaS) solutions on the market. It is used to automatically deploy Kubernetes clusters and provides useful extensions for cluster management mixed with some magic under the hood. Instantiating a Kubernetes cluster is often a crucial step in setting up a modern application stack. But be aware – a lot of configuration parameters are awaiting you. And here several misconfigurations may occur that can lead up to a compromise of the cluster. Privileged containers, tainting of masters and executing workloads on them, missing role-based access controls, and misconfigured Service Accounts are part of the problem. In this talk, I will explain which configuration parameters of an OpenShift environment are critical to ensure the overall security of the deployed Kubernetes clusters. Implications of misconfigurations will be demonstrated during live demos. Finally, recommendations for a secure configuration are provided.

DevSecCon London 2019: How to Secure OpenShift Environments and What Happens ...

DevSecCon

Matt Carroll Infrastructure Security Engineer at Yelp "Attestation is hard" is something you might hear from security researchers tracking nation states and APTs, but it's actually pretty true for most network-connected systems! Modern deployment methodologies mean that disparate teams create workloads for shared worker-hosts (ranging from Jenkins to Kubernetes and all the other orchestrators and CI tools in-between), meaning that at any given moment your hosts could be running any one of a number of services, connecting to who-knows-what on the internet. So when your network-based intrusion detection system (IDS) opaquely declares that one of these machines has made an "anomalous" network connection, how do you even determine if it's business as usual? Sure you can log on to the host to try and figure it out, but (in case you hadn't noticed) computers are pretty fast these days, and once the connection is closed it might as well not have happened... Assuming it wasn't actually a reverse shell... At Yelp we turned to the Linux kernel to tell us whodunit! Utilizing the Linux kernel's eBPF subsystem - an in-kernel VM with syscall hooking capabilities - we're able to aggregate metadata about the calling process tree for any internet-bound TCP connection by filtering IPs and ports in-kernel and enriching with process tree information in userland. The result is "pidtree-bcc": a supplementary IDS. Now whenever there's an alert for a suspicious connection, we just search for it in our SIEM (spoiler alert: it's nearly always an engineer doing something "innovative")! And the cherry on top? It's stupid fast with negligible overhead, creating a much higher signal-to-noise ratio than the kernels firehose-like audit subsystems. This talk will look at how you can tune the signal-to-noise ratio of your IDS by making it reflect your business logic and common usage patterns, get more work done by reducing MTTR for false positives, use eBPF and the kernel to do all the hard work for you, accidentally load test your new IDS by not filtering all RFC-1918 addresses, and abuse Docker to get to production ASAP! As well as looking at some of the technologies that the kernel puts at your disposal, this talk will also tell pidtree-bcc's road from hackathon project to production system and how focus on demonstrating business value early on allowed the organization to give us buy-in to build and deploy a brand new project from scratch.

DevSecCon London 2019: A Kernel of Truth: Intrusion Detection and Attestation...

DevSecCon

Kristóf Tóth Software Engineer at Avatao The world is getting eaten alive by software. At this point, almost nothing can be done without interacting with some sort of software system. Not even buying your groceries. As we keep dumping out huge piles of code like there is no tomorrow, our far from perfect systems keep getting worse and worse from a security standpoint. What could possibly go wrong? We believe that education is the missing link. As appsec is still a curiosity topic on top universities, freshly graduated engineers simply have no clue. And how could they? The number of programmers keeps on doubling every few years and generations of software professionals are stuck without a proper background in ITSec. As this trend continues, our responsibility to do something about this is on the rise. In hopes of fighting this trend, we, at Avatao, have decided to share some of our dreams with the community. Our Tutorial Framework allows you to easily create interactive learning environments running inside Docker containers. These environments are capable of automatically guiding users through a set of topics by allowing them to interact with real software through a simple web browser. Users can attack webservices, write code to fix them or use a terminal to deploy websites by creating and pushing git tags. Nothing here is a mock-up: Every software component is real. In this talk, I am going to demonstrate the capabilities of the framework, talk about the technology behind it and explore some use cases for it. During the session we will open source the framework with the hope of creating a better, secure future together.

DevSecCon Seattle 2019: Containerizing IT Security Knowledge

DevSecCon

Sitaraman Lakshminarayanan Sr Security Architect at Pure Storage Authorization has two components – Policy Definition and Policy Enforcement. Traditionally both used to be centralized and we spent all the time Integrating products- Built or Bought with Centralized Access Management. This typically led to increased cycle time to change any access policy or change software/deployment to fit into one particular authorization model. When that doesn’t fit, we would end up with multiple authorization enforcements written in different languages with or without any adherence to any standards such as XACML or others. Imagine building few different or hundreds of products or services or micro services and you have to centrally manage all possible access policies. It’s definitely not a scalable solution in fast moving CI/CD world. Now imagine a way where every developers or products can externalize its authorization and we can modify authorization enforcement in a consistent manner? Imagine where developers can write their own implementation of how authorization should be enforced for their environment? Remember there is no one size fits all authorization policy. A policy that works for your environment does not work for my environment – for any number of reasons from Risk management to type of business applications. Open Policy Agent provides a consistent way to write authorization logic and expose it as REST API. Applications can easily integrate with OPA and can also write their own authroziation logics. Whether you are shipping products to customers or integrating a Product or Service into your environment, how awesome it would be to enforce your own authorization rules instead of changing your business process of who can gain access to what features. In this talk we will explore the benefits of Decentralized Authorization and how to use Open Policy Agent to achieve decentralized authorization. A closer look at few applications /integrations whether it is REST API /Micro Services, or Kubernetes to control various authorization policies as to who can deploy/what can you deploy. We will also look at how to build Integration tests to check our authorization policies.

DevSecCon Seattle 2019: Decentralized Authorization - Implementing Fine Grain...

DevSecCon

DevSecCon Seattle 2019: Liquid Software as the real solution for the Sec in D...

DevSecCon

Matt Lavin Software Architect at LifeOmic It's possible to have rapid feature delivery and happy developers without sacrificing high security and compliance. At LifeOmic, we've built an automated change management system that allows production deployments without slow human approval. We maintain HIPAA and HITRUST compliance while still allowing continuous delivery. I'll show how to collect data from BitBucket, Jenkins, and security scan tools to ensure that the approved processes have been followed. You'll hear how fast production approval incentivizes developers to follow good practices, and become advocates for following the process instead of pushing against it. Automating process checks as a gate to deployments is a great framework for promoting the behavior you want in your organization. Don't give up on rapid feature delivery just because you work in a regulated industry.

DevSecCon Seattle 2019: Fully Automated production deployments with HIPAA/HIT...

DevSecCon

Julian Berton Preventing a company from becoming the newest data breach statistic can be a daunting prospect. Especially working within a company that employs hundreds of engineers pushing code to production daily, it often feels like everything is on fire and the holy grail of producing a security inspired product is but a dim light growing further and further away. The same feeling is true for security aware engineers being pushed to develop products quickly but also expected to consider quality assurance, operations, security and the reliability of their application or service. To help reduce the bleeding and build more security aware applications at scale, a balance of firefighting, preventative initiatives, automation and "JIT" education is required. So strap yourself in while we take you on a journey through 4 years of security successes and epic failures: * Automation - Implementing a secure-by-default build system (Buildkite) that makes detecting vulnerable dependencies (Snyk), storing secrets (AWS Secrets Manager) and scanning Docker containers, an effortless process. * Prevention - Eradicate several classes of bugs by selecting secure architectural patterns and using automated scripts to detect operational misconfigurations like dangling DNS entries, open S3 buckets, secrets checked into source code and repositories that have been made accidentally public. * "JIT” Education - Changing a companies security culture with RFC's for security standards, security integrated PIR via bug bounty program reports, visibility through security maturity frameworks (BSIMM).

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: Four years of reflection: How (not) to secure Web A...

DevSecCon

Rahul Kumar & Rupali Dash In the current era of blockchain technology, mining crypto currency is one of the biggest hit. The talk covers how the attackers use the insecure containers to mine crypto currency and earn million dollar profits. Cryptojacking activity surged to its peak in December 2017, when more than 8 million cryptojacking events were blocked by many intrusion detection companies. While there have seen a slight fall in activity in 2018, it is still at an elevated level, with total cryptojacking events blocked in July 2018 totalling just less than 5 million. The talk will cover how the mining activities has been done using browsers as well as cloud containers. We will also discuss how the cloud provides like amazon, azure and go are detecting such kind of activities and how minor misconfigurations leads to million dollar currency mining. The talk will also cover how 3rd party security providers like symantec and z-scalar and other intrusion detection system has configured signatures to block such kind of attacks. As well as from a sec-ops prospective what configuration checks should be done to prevent against such kind of attacks as well as detection of attacks. It will also cover some case studies and attack scenarios of mining Monero and the huge financial losses because of this attacks.

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: crypto jacking: An evolving threat for cloud contai...

DevSecCon

Trinh Tran & Dennis Stötzel Are you trying to stay secure while developing and running a bunch of services and applications every day? So are we and it’s a huge pain in the… pipeline. We have been juggling these aspects while working with one of the biggest insurance companies in the world. In this talk, we will share our experiences of the last three years: Trinh, as a software engineer in Vietnam and Dennis, as a security engineer in Germany. We will present our experiences of making "dev", "sec" and "ops" coexist – without sparing any dirty details. Our goal has always been fast delivery and secure applications using pipelines, containers, orchestration, and the cloud. Let us explain which of these goals we have met and which remain goals, where we messed up and where we found glory. We will cover the following topics in our talk: * Evolution of our project, from beginning with four engineers running in one office, to expanding to fifty engineers coming from three continents and different backgrounds, * Development, delivery and security as a requirement in an agile project, * The good, the bad and the ugly in technology, architecture and infrastructure.

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: Can "dev", "sec" and "ops" really coexist in the wi...

DevSecCon

Sanoop Thomas & Samandeep Singh Burp suite is the de-facto proxy application for web security testers. This hands-on workshop will explore the different capabilities of burp proxy application, also dive into the extensions and tooling options to perform improved application security test cases. The workshop will start with a quick overview of burp usage, different settings, features, some commonly useful extensions and then explore deep into its extension APIs to build your own custom extensions. We will provide a suitable development environment in Java and Python platforms. This will be a hands-on workshop and participants will learn how to automate different application security test scenarios and build burp extensions with the help of templates.

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: Workshop - Burp extension writing workshop

DevSecCon

Cameron Townshend Today’s pace of innovation and need to out “innovate” competitors can often cause developers to bypass key portions of Gene Kim’s Three Ways of DevOps - specifically to never pass a known defect downstream and emphasize performance of the entire system. As we embrace movements like CI, CD and Devops to cut down on release cycles - and innovate faster, we as developers must also embrace the reality that the risk landscape is too complex to leave “security” to just those with security in their title. Traditional methods do not cut it anymore – it’s time for DevSecOps. Instinctively, we understand how critical this is. In Sonatype’s recent 2018 DevSecOps Community report, where 2,076 IT professionals were surveyed, 48% of respondents admitted that developers know application security is important, but they don’t have the time to spend on it. Done properly, DevSecOps practices shouldn’t interrupt the DevOps pipeline - but instead aid it - preventing costly rebuilds and build breaks, down the road. By creating automated governance and compliance guardrails that are embedded early and throughout the software development lifecycle, developers have transparent access to digital guardrails integrated within our native tools — an approach that ensures security is being built in without slowing us down. These instant feedback loops detailing good or bad components have been shown to increase developer productivity by as much as 48%. Over time, this approach ensures developers procure the best components from the best suppliers, while continuously tracking components across the entire lifecycle. Attendees of this session will walk away with: Real-world examples of how large and small companies are implementing DevSecOps practices in their own delivery pipelines, and increasing developer awareness to risks Key insights from 2,076 of their peers who participated in the 2018 DevSecOps community report - including where most mature DevOps practices are focusing their security efforts A walkthrough of how security principles have been embedded in a CICD pipeline and what standards for implementation are beginning to follow suite

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: Embracing Security - A changing DevOps landscape

DevSecCon

Tilak T Web-Services are taking over the world. Rest-framework is accelerating this development, because of its ease and flexibility. Developers often use and develop REST-based applications because it's exciting to work with. But they forget about security which leads to compromised and exploited applications. For instance, in more recent security tests against Web Services that my team executed, we found that vulnerabilities like Insecure Deserialization, XML External Entities, Server-Side Template Injection and Authorization Flaws are quite prevalent. I have found some simple steps that engineering teams can take towards finding and fixing such vulnerabilities with Web Services. This talk is offering a holistic perspective on finding and fixing some uncommon flaws that will be replete with anecdotes and examples of secure and insecure code. I will also delve into automating SAST and DAST tools using Robot-Framework to identify such flaws in Web-Services.

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: Web Services aren’t as secure as we think

DevSecCon

Sharath Kumar Ramadas Serverless Technology (Functions as a Service) is fast becoming the next "big thing" in the world of distributed applications. Organizations are investing a great deal of resources in this technology as a force-multiplier, cost-saver and ops-simplification cure-all. Especially with widespread support from cloud vendors, this technology is going to only become more influential. However, like everything else, Serverless apps are subject to a wide variety of attack possibilities, ranging from attacks against access control tech like JWTs, to NoSQL Injection, to exploits against the apps themselves (deserialization, etc) escalating privileges to other cloud components. On the other hand GraphQL (API Query Language) is the natural companion to serverless apps, where traditional REST APIs are replaced with GraphQL to provide greater flexibility, greater query parameterization and speed. GraphQL is slowly negating the need for REST APIs from being developed. Combined with Serverless tech/Reactive Front-end frameworks, GraphQL is very powerful for distributed apps. However, GraphQL can be abused with a variety of attacks including but not limited to Injection Attacks, Nested Resource Exhaustion attacks, Authorization Flaws among others. This talk presents a red-team perspective of the various ways in which testers can discover and exploit serverless and/or GraphQL driven applications to compromise sensitive information, and gain a deeper foothold into database services, IAM services and other other cloud components. The talk will have some demos that will demonstrate practical attacks and attack possibilities against Serverless and GraphQL applications. The author will release an intentionally vulnerable Serverless and GraphQL app at the end of the talk for the benefit of the audience and the security community at large.

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: An attacker's view of Serverless and GraphQL apps S...

DevSecCon

Nadira Bajrei IT Continuous Improvement and Knowledge Management at Bank Mandiri Tbk We all know that the Banking industry is highly regulated. But due to recent changing factors, we had to trigger something we call transformation. Two of the most important reasons why we need transformation are firstly digital disruption, a wave our industry is hard pushed to follow, and secondly the evolving customer expectation and competitive environment, which are impacting the way organisations are delivering value. We need a new way of working to help us stay relevant in the market. This session will focus on our journey as one of the biggest banks in Indonesia to do digital transformation into DevOps while maintaining security compliance requirements. I will elaborate on the main reason why we need transformation, our journey roadmap, the step by step adoption of CALMS Values in our organisation and how we faced challenges from internal and external site.

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: The journey of digital transformation through DevSe...

DevSecCon

Liz Rice The latest Kubernetes version provides many security-related enhancements and controls, but it is far from being secure by default. Kubernetes is a complex orchestration platform with many different implementations, across multi-cloud/hybrid environments. Configuring it to comply with security best practices and specific security requires time and expertise that most organizations don’t possess. Aqua’s open source tools arm Kubernetes administrators and developers with an easy way to identify weaknesses in their deployments so that they can address those issues before they are exploited by attackers. During this presentation, we’ll review how these open source tools offer preventive security for Kubernetes: Kube-Bench: checks a Kubernetes cluster against 100+ checks documented in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark. Kube-Hunter: conducts penetration tests against Kubernetes clusters that hunt for exploitable vulnerabilities and misconfiguration - both from outside the cluster as well as inside it (running as a pod)

DevSecCon Singapore 2019: Preventative Security for Kubernetes

DevSecCon

COLIN DOMONEY The advent of DevOps and large scale automation of software construction and delivery has elevated the software supply chain – and its underpinning delivery pipeline – to mission critical status in any modern enterprise. The increased velocity of modern pipelines and the removal of manual checks and balances has meant that modern pipelines are potential single points of failure in the delivery of secure software. Automotive and consumer electronics industries have long understood the need for both provenance (understanding the origin of materials) and veracity (ensuring the integrity of their manufacturing processes) in their supply chains; this presentation will address threats to software supply chains and practical approaches to reducing the fragility of your supply chain. Several examples of software supply chain failures will be presented and deconstructed to understand the typical failure modes. At the most elementary level many pipelines are poorly constructed with low levels of repeatability and poor test coverage, in other organisations there is a lack of governance over the supply chain allowing careless or willingly negligent actors to subvert or bypass controls or testing within the pipeline. There is also no standard mechanism to ensure a ‘chain of custody’ within a pipeline due to a lack common interchange format between tools, or a standard manner to represent the steps within a pipeline build process. This presentation will cover approaches (using ‘people and process’) in enforcing governance within a supply chain by describing best practices used in large-scale AppSec programmes. Several emerging technology initiatives will be presented: Google’s Grafeas is a means to ensure vulnerability information is represented in a uniform manner across all steps of a pipeline process, while In-Toto is a project to formally enforce the integrity of a pipeline process. A reference secure pipeline will be presented demonstrating both tools working in symphony, along with standard open source and commercial AppSec tools. Finally the pipeline itself may become the Achille’s Heel in an organisation – many pipelines are not sufficiently hardened and are themselves open to attack by use of vulnerable components and their extensible nature, often along with very wide open permissions. Guidance will be given on hardening of typical pipelines, and a fully secured ephemeral Jenkins pipeline will be demonstrated. Benefits of this Session: The attendee will gain an increased awareness of the pivotal importance of the software supply chain, and gain an understanding of some common failure modes and weaknesses. Most importantly the attendee will come away with practical guidance on enforcing higher levels of governance on their supply chain without reducing delivery velocity, as well as how to harden the pipeline infrastructure itself.

DevSecCon London 2018: Is your supply chain your achille's heel

DevSecCon

Paweł Krawczyk Most network services and daemons now offer TLS transport protection and their managing certificates and TLS configuration for server farms may use more resources than actual configuration of these services. What if you could get rid of all this complexity and replace it by single transport protection protocol, securing all of the traffic between your servers trasparently and with single centralized key and configuration management? This will be a story of a successful implementation of IPSec protocols, largely and undeservedly forgotten in that purpose, for securing a farm of production cloud servers, with configuration centrally managed with Ansible.

DevSecCon London 2018: Get rid of these TLS certificates

DevSecCon

PETKO D. PETKOV Thanks to the DevSecOps philosophy a growing number of organisations around the world are ensuring their businesses are set up with the security in mind from the get-go. DevSecOps is taking the world by storm. This talk is about how to introduce DevSecOps in your organisation with ready-made, zero-cost, open source templates accessible to everyone. The talk will introduce the OpenDevSecOps project and show many practical examples of how to easily deploy security testing infrastructure on top of existing and well-established development tools.

DevSecCon London 2018: Open DevSecOps

DevSecCon

Plus de DevSecCon (20)