В разительном контрасте с «греческими» варварами иранский император Ксеркс I правил самой цивилизованной империей в мире. By Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis Мухаммад Шамсаддин Мегаломматис I shared with friends a comment that I sent to Dr. Kaveh Farrokh, discussing issues of racist and deliberate falsification of Ancient Iranian History attested in Western universities and among scholars who fail to undertake interdisciplinary studies and be objective and impartial in their research. The cases of the untrustworthy Ancient Greek sources and Herodotus' felonious narratives are referred to; more attention is given to illustrious Ancient Greek high priests, who utterly rejected and denounced Herodotus' 'malignancy'. My introductory letter and the comment are herewith included, along with many links for further reading and research.

1. In strikingcontrastto the 'Greek'barbarians,
IranianEmperor XerxesI ruled the World's
most Civilized Empire
В разительном контрасте с «греческими» варварами
иранский император Ксеркс I правил самой
цивилизованной империей в мире.
By MuhammadShamsaddin Megalommatis
Мухаммад ШамсаддинМегаломматис
I shared with friends a comment that I sent to Dr. Kaveh Farrokh,discussing issues
of racist and deliberate falsification of Ancient Iranian History attested in Western
universities and among scholars who fail to undertake interdisciplinary studies and
be objective and impartial in their research. The cases of the untrustworthy Ancient
Greek sources and Herodotus' felonious narratives are referred to; more attention is
given to illustrious Ancient Greek high priests, who utterly rejected and denounced
Herodotus' 'malignancy'. My introductory letter and the comment are herewith
included, along with many links for further reading and research.
---------------------------------------------------
Dear All,
This is the congratulatory comment that I sent (9th April 2022) to the Iranologist
Dr. Kaveh Farrokh for his brief but comprehensive article about the Great Iranian
Emperor Hshaya Rshah (Xerxes) I, who was undeservedly insulted by the inferior
and uncivilized Ancient Ionians, Dorians and Aeolians (the so-called «Greeks»),
because of their misery, insignificance, hatred, nuisance, and abysmal complex of
inferiority toward the world’s most formidable empire of those times (6th-4th c.
BCE).
Compared to Xerxes’ magnificent capital Parsa (erroneously called among the
‘Greeks’ as ‘Persepolis’), the Acropolis of Athens looked like a stable for horses and the
temple at Delphi looked like a useless kiosk.
At the origin of the pathetic badmouthing of the illustrious Achaemenid dynasty
is Herodotus — not a Greek, but a Carian (Western Anatolian)trash, a traitor of his
own country (Caria accepted the Achaemenid rule in striking contrast to the idiotic
and barbaric Ancient ‘Greeks’).

2. All the same, centuries later, Plutarch, High Priest of the Oracle of Delphi, denounced
and denigrated the disreputable pseudo-historian Herodotus, writing a ca. 10000
words text On Herodotus’s malignancy. Plutarch was a person incommensurately
higher than all the Ancient ‘Greek’ historians, tragedians and impious politicians,
whom today’s corrupt, vicious, anomalous (atheist, homosexual, transvestite and
incestuous) Western Europeans and North Americans admire because of their
delinquency.
This text, written by a superior authority (the highest and holiestrank a man could
have in Ancient Greece), fully demolishes many Ancient ‘Greek’ times’ lies and
distortions that are still presented as «History» in the colonial, criminal, racist, anti-
African, anti-Asiatic,anti-Oriental, anti-Islamic, anti-Christian pseudo-universities of
Western Europe and North America.
More details, links to Wikipedia entries, and modern translations of Plutarch’s
devastating criticism of Herodotus’ nonsensical bogus-History you will find in my
comment below!
I attach Kaveh Farrokh’s article that you can also find here:
https://www.academia.edu/75928427/Farrokh_K_2022_Who_was_the_real_Xerxes
_in_his_earlier_years_Persian_Heritage_104_pp_27_29
Best regards,
Shamsaddin
===============================
Dear Kaveh,
I downloaded and read your concise, up-to-the-point,and comprehensive
presentation. It is a great effort to effectively debunk the Ancient Greek fallacies
about Achaemenid Iran.
I guess that when (p. 27,4th column, close to the bottom) you speak of "Egyptian
popular/colloquial as well as hieroglyphic texts", you rather mean "Egyptian
Demotic as well as Hieroglyphic texts".
{ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demotic_(Egyptian) }
HERODOTUS - A CARIAN, NOT A GREEK
Speaking of Herodotus, I believe one must stress one basic point: he was neither an
Ionian, nor an Aeolian, nor a Dorian. In fact, he was not a Greek; he was Carian. He
left (or betrayed) his country because the outright majority wanted to become part of
the Empire. If Kerensky wrote more against the USSR, after he arrived in France
(1917), he would be considered as the 20th c.
Herodotus! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Kerensky
THE EGYPTIANS USED THE GREEKS AGAINST IRAN
Personally, I believe that the very intimate and intricate impact of the Ancient
Egyptians on the various peoples and races of South Balkans and the interconnection
of some of them with some Ancient Egyptian priesthoods are at the very origin of the
Anti-Iranian stance of several Ancient Greek cities-states. Ancient Egypt never had
one religion; there were always incessant religious wars and fights, and at times they
took a very violent form. For instance, the incineration of the defeated Bakenranef

3. (Bocchoris), last king of the 24th dynasty, by the Cushite Shebitqo gives only an idea.
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakenranef )
The religious division of Egypt is a millennia-long issue, with the Iwnw
(Heliopolitan) priesthood opposing the spread of the Memphite dogma of Ptah. After
the rise of the 18th dynasty (16th c. BCE),Egypt came to know terrible divisions
between the monotheists (Atenism) and the polytheistic followers of the Theban
priesthood of Amun (Theban Trinity).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atenism
For more than 250 years before Cambyses invaded Egypt, the Theban priests (in their
antagonism with their counterparts of Heliopolis) demanded the help of the Cushite
(Ancient Sudanese) kings of Napata, who moved to Thebes and ruled from both
capitals. When Shebitqo's cousin and successor Taharqa seemed to prevail and
reunify the Two Lands (this was the true name of Ancient Egypt), the Assyrians
(who supported the Heliopolitan priests against the Theban and the Memphite
priesthoods) understood the danger, and -finally- not only intervened but occupied
and annexed Egypt (670,669, 666 BCE).
The Achaemenids in Egypt (as already in Babylonia) followed/imitated the Assyrian
Imperial policy. They mainly worked with the Heliopolitan priests; this practice was
later reproduced by the Ptolemies. As many Ancient Greeks traveled to Memphis (in
particular) to study, a bond has been formed, and this can explain to some extent
how the Memphite Egyptian priests incited the Greek cities-states against the
Iranians.
GREEKS COMMITTED A SACRILEGE, FIGHTING AGAINST THE IRANIAN
EMPIRE
This issue has always been concealed by biased modern scholarship, but it is true;
the Oracle of Delphi advised for the acceptance of the Iranian demands.
PLUTARCH, HIGH PRIEST AT DELPHI, DENOUNCED HERODOTUS'
MALIGNANCY
More importantly, in his Moralia, Plutarch elaborated a 9000+ words essay to decry
Herodotus' fallacious pseudo-histories. The title is 'On the Malignancy of Herodotus'.
This is a goldmine for many unbiased scholars to use in order to demolish the racist
theories as per which the Ancient Greeks 'represented the civilized world' and 'saved
Europe from the barbarians'. The historical truth is the exact opposite. About:
https://el.wikisource.org/wiki/Περί_της_Ηροδότου_κακοηθείας_(Πλούταρχος)
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0352
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Malice_of_Herodotus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moralia
Many biased and racist academics wrote and expanded already on this topic, which
certainly destroys -in and by itself- the aforementioned racist forgery; they did so in
order to discredit Plutarch and preserve the Western European colonial dogma and
Greco-centric model. Even worse, in Greece (where all pseudo-professors write and
teach a militant version of Greco-centric bogus-History, while ostracizing all the
opponents and challengers), they gave this topic to a young student to write a most
partial 'dissertation' about it - probably, as they usually say, 'to defend the national
standpoint'!

4. https://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/133637/files/GRI-2014-11683.pdf
NEO-NAZI GREEKS IMPOSE THEIR DOGMA IN TODAY'S GREECE
All the same, nowadays, you can find many ignorant and racist Greeks, who -failing
to adjust the Oracle of Delphi to their chauvinist and pathetic mindsets- denigrate
Ancient Greece's holiest shrine as 'the Phoenician Oracle' or 'the Luciferians of
Delphi'! Fabulous!! Read:
https://www.triklopodia.gr/περί-πλουτάρχου-κακοηθείας/