SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  181
PI-RADS PROSTATE IMAGING-REPORTING
AND DATA SYSTEM: 2015,VERSION 2
Dr. Vincent Batista Lemaire
Locum Consultant Radiologist
St. Richards Hospital ,West Sussex Hospitals Trust, NHS .
Chichester , England , UK .
PI-RADS PROSTATE
IMAGING-REPORTING
AND DATA SYSTEM:
2015,VERSION 2
F R O M C O L L A B O R A T I O N O F A M E R I C A N
C O L L E G E O F R A D I O L O G Y
( A C R ) , E U R O P E A N S O C I E T Y O F
U R O R A D I O L O G Y ( E S U R ) A N D A D M E T E C H
F O U N D A T I O N
WHY THE PI-RADS
Global
standardization
Diminish
variation in :
* acquisition
*interpretation
* reporting
- Worldwide , there are and estimated 1,600,000 new cases of
prostate cancer and 366,000 prostate cancer death annually,
making it the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and the
seventh leading cause of male cancer death .
- Prostate cancer is the second most commonly cancer diagnosed
in the United States after skin cancer, with 161,000 new prostate
cancer diagnoses and approximately 26,700 prostate cancer
deaths.
- 1 in 6 men would develop prostate cancer in their lifetime; however
, only 1 in 34 men would die from prostate cancer.
- Good prognosis but some are aggressive .
- 70% of death due to prostate cancer occur after age 75.
- Older age is the strongest risk factor for the development of prostate
cancer.
- Black men are twice as likely to die of prostate cancer than other
men.
- Family history have an increase risk of 2.5 fold
- The risk of prostate cancer among men with elevated PSA levels is
lower in men with urinary symptoms than in men without symptoms.
How to make the diagnosis and deliver the best preventive and
treatment options?
DRE
PSA
TRUS biopsy and
mpMRI
Sensitivity is the number of true positive results divided by the sum of
the true positive results and false negative results .
Specificity is the number of true negative results divided by the sum
of the true negative results and false positive results .
Our primary goal is to find a screening strategy that will improve
sensitivity without sacrificing specificity.
Digital Rectal Exam
One study of 6,630 men volunteering for DRE and prostate-specific antigen
screening tests, 45% of the cancers that were detected were missed by the
DRE. Other authors have reported finding cancer in 15% to 18% of men with
a normal DRE.
If a lump is found, the chances are about 1 in 4 that it is cancerous.
Abnormal prostate findings include nodules, asymmetry, or induration. DRE
can detect tumours in the posterior and lateral aspects of the prostate gland;
an inherent limitation to the digital examination is that only 85 percent of
cancers arise peripherally where they can be detected with a finger
examination [86]. Stage T1 cancers are non palpable by definition.
Digital rectal exam
DIGITAL RECTAL EXAM
A new study found that, while not 100% accurate, digital rectal examination
(DRE) should remain a standard for screening for prostate cancer and may
even be able to identify cases of the disease that are not picked up by
the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test. The results of the study were
reported in The Canadian Journal of Urology.
Our study confirms that the digital rectal exam remains an important part of
screening such patients because 31 percent of cancers in our study would
have been missed by using age-specific PSA cut offs alone,” Raman said
The DRE is also inexpensive, costing approximately $28 (Crawford
et. al. 1999). Though it is readily available by appointment in a
doctor's office, there is discomfort for the patient and a risk of slight
bleeding (American Cancer Society 2006).
With the DRE test, the experience of the doctor is of utmost
importance, yet, new, inexperienced urologists often perform the test.
The sensitivity is 27.1% and the specificity is 49.0% (Marcus
2004).
Digital rectal exam
PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) — PSA is a glycoprotein
produced by prostate epithelial cells. In men with prostate cancer
PSA production is increased and the tissue barriers between the
prostate gland lumen and the capillary are disrupted. PSA elevations
can precede clinical disease by 5 to 10 years.
Screening: beginning at age 50, though not with men who have a
comorbidity that limits their life expectancy to less than 10 years .
We suggest that providers first discuss screening with men at high
risk for prostate cancer, including black men, men with a family
history of prostate cancer, particularly in relatives younger than age
65, and men who are known or likely to have the BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutations, beginning at age 40 to 45.
PSA
PSA
*The PSA test is simply a blood test, widely available to the general
population.
* It is costs the patient roughly $30 to $60.
* The sensitivity is 64% and the specificity is 91% .
PSA
Serum PSA levels were considered normal if they fell into specific thresholds
based
on age :
<50 years, PSA <2.5 ng/mL;
51-60 years, PSA <3.5 ng/mL;
61-70 years, PSA <4.5 ng/mL;
and >70 years, PSA <6.5 ng/mL).
PSA
The traditional cut off for an abnormal PSA level in the major screening studies
has been 4.0 ng/mL. .
In a pooled analysis, the estimated sensitivity of a PSA cut off of 4.0 ng/mL was
21 percent for detecting any prostate cancer and 51 percent for detecting
high-grade cancers (Gleason ≥8). Using a cut off of 3.0 ng/mL increased
these sensitivities to 32 and 68 percent, respectively. The estimated
specificity was 91 percent for a PSA cut off of 4.0 ng/mL and 85 percent for a
3.0 ng/mL cut off. PSA has poorer discriminating ability in men with
symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia [48].
PSA: NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER
NETWORK :GUIDELINES 2014
1. Baseline testing at age 45-49 years with retesting at 50 years in patent with a
level below 0.7ng/ml.
2. Annual or biannual retesting in those with a level of 1.0ng/ml or higher.
3. For patient aged 50-70 years with a normal RE and PSA below 3 ng/ml, the
NCCN recommends retesting every 1-2 years.
ELEVATED PSA
- DRE : transient elevation from 0.26 to 0.4ng/ml
- Ejaculation : can increase PSA levels by up to 0.8 ng/mL, though levels return to
normal within 48 hours.
-Bacterial prostatitis; Asymptomatic prostatic inflammation can also elevate PSA
levels, but this diagnosis is made on biopsy and so cannot generally be used
to defer screening
-Prostate biopsy , transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): A screening
PSA test should not be performed for at least six weeks following either of
these procedures.
-Acute urinary retention.
PSA
PSA: relatively low sensibility , increased PSA is not equivalent with
tumour..
Screening is controversial: over diagnosis and overtreatment
TRUS biopsies based on a systematic approach tend to target the peripheral
aspects of the gland and are likely to miss 30-40% of prostate cancer located in the
anterior, midline transition zone, or apex. Today, however, many tumours are being
identified at a very early stage, often as extremely small lesions that are hard to spot
on
ultrasound and hard to sample using a TRUS biopsy alone.
"If we adopted this approach, we could reduce the number of men needing biopsies
by
50% (223 vs 109), we could reduce the biopsy cores we took by 80% (2672 vs 322)
and,
most importantly, we could reduce the diagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer by up
to
90% (47 vs 5), and still we'd find 12% more intermediate- to high-risk cancers (79 vs
89).
“For patients with intermediate- to high-risk cancer, the estimated sensitivity of MRI
plus
biopsy was 92.34% — "far outperforming that of the TRUS plus biopsy (70.44%),"
said
TRUS BIOPSY
Mp MRI
Mp MRI
Mp MRI
*Clinically significant cancer was defined as Gleason score 4+3
or
a maximum cancer core length of 6 mm or longer .
*MRI picks up 93% of aggressive cancers , compared with 48%
for
biopsy.
*More than a quarter (27%) of all men with suspected cancer
could
avoid a biopsy .
*If subsequent TRUS-biopsy were directed by MP-MRI findings,
up to
18% more cases of significant cancer might be detected .
GLEASON SCORE AND ZONAL
ANATOMY
The scoring system is named after Donald Gleason (1920-2008), a
pathologist at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Hospital, who developed it
with colleagues at that facility in the 1960s. In 2005, the Gleason system
was altered by the International Society of Urological Pathology. The criteria
were refined and the attribution of certain patterns changed. It has been
shown that this 'modified Gleason score' has higher performance than the
original one, and is currently assumed standard in urological pathology.
Gleason grading system
GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM
A total score is calculated based on how cells look under a microscope, with
half the score based on the appearance of the most common cell
morphology (scored 1—5), and the other half based off the appearance
of the second most common cell morphology (scored 1—5). These two
numbers are then combined to produce a total score for the cancer.
The Gleason Grade/Score has two main points: 1: Based on architectural
patterns, rather than cytological ones. The second feature of Gleason
grading is that the grade is not based on the highest (least
differentiated) pattern within the tumor, instead it is a combination
of the most often and second most often patterns seen. Gleason
realized that prostatic carcinomas have multiple patterns and that the
prognosis of prostatic carcinoma was split between the most prevalent
and the second most prevalent neoplasm pattern.
GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM
What does it mean?
A Gleason score
A 2 and 6 is a low grade prostate cancer, likely to grow very slowly. A
Gleason score of 7 is an intermediate grade that will grow at a moderate
rate. A Gleason score of 8 to 10 is a high grade cancer that is likely to grow
more quickly.
If your Gleason score is low and you are older or have early stage disease
your urologist is likely to suggest active monitoring rather than surgery or
radiotherapy. This is because your cancer may not spread or have any impact
upon your health. If you have a high Gleason score, are younger or have
higher stage disease, your urologist is more likely to suggest you have active
treatment.
GLEASON 3+4 AND GLEASON 4+3
Despite the confusing numbering system, 3+3 is the lowest possible
Gleason score reported today. 3+3 doesn't metastasize, and some
pathologists, therefore, don't even think it should be called "cancer." It is
generally, depending on other case characteristics, low-risk.
Gleason scores that add up to 7 are generally intermediate risk. 3+4 is
generally a favourable intermediate risk, and 4+3 is generally an
unfavourable intermediate risk. The difference is the amount of Gleason
pattern 4 cells present. The more pattern 4, the more aggressive the tumor.
3+4 means less than 50% pattern 4, and 4+3 means greater than 50%
pattern 4.
GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM
GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM
GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM
1. Multifocal and heterogeneous cancer is
common , occurring in 60%
2. Cancer with high Gleason score are more likely
to exhibit pronounced imaging characteristic
on mpMRI with accordingly high PI-RADS
scores.
3. Early stage Gleason score 3+ 3, mpMRI does
poorly .
ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
GLAND
John E Mc Neal ,1930-
2005, worked at Standford
ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE GLAND
ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
GLAND
DUCTS AND ZONAL ANATOMY
ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
FASCIA AROUND THE PROSTATE
1.prostatic fascia: anteriorly and antero-laterally , it is in direct continuity
with the fibromuscular stroma .
2.Laterally : it fuses with the endopelvic fascia.
3.posteriorly , it fuses with , and is indistinguishable from , Denonvilliers
fascia with lies between the prostate and the rectum and covers the
seminal vesicle posteriorly .
PELVIC FASCIAE IN UROLOGY
B RAYCHAUDHURI AND D CAHILL
THE ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 2008 90:8, 633-637
The findings of the study were as follows:
The ‘capsule’ of the prostate does not exist. Rather, the fibromuscular band
surrounding the prostate forms an integral part of the gland.
The prostate is surrounded by fascial structures – anteriorly/anterolaterally
by the prostatic fascia and posteriorly by the Denonvilliers' fascia.
Laterally, the prostatic fascia merges with the endopelvic fascia.
The posterior longitudinal fascia of the detrusor comprises a ‘posterior
layer’ of the detrusor apron, extending from the bladder neck to the
prostate base.
The neurovascular structures tend to be located posterolaterally, at 5 and 7
o’clock ,but may not always form a bundle. A significant proportion of
fibres may lie away from the main nerve structures, along the
lateral/posterior aspects of the prostate.
PELVIC NODES
PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer is the most
effective method for detecting lymph node metastases
The accuracy of standard imaging modalities such as computed
tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting
nodal metastases remains poor.
MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI
 Axial T1 LFOV Pelvis
 Axial, coronal, (sagittal) T2 SFOV Prostate
 Axial DWI (b=0,150,500,1000) with ADC map
 High b value (b1400, b2000)
 Volume T1 fat sat (VIBE)
pre- and dynamic post-contrast
MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI
1. It is not intended to make a diagnosis .
2. The main goal is to suggest the target site in patient with suspicious
findings .
ESUR GUIDELINES
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
A normal prostate gland is approximately 20 gr in volume, 3 cms in length,
4 cms wide and 2 cms depth . The base of the gland is in continuity to
the bladder, and anterior to the rectum. The prostate ends at the apex
before becoming the striated external urethral sphincter. The sphincter
is a vertically oriented tubular sheath that surrounds the membranous
urethra and prostate.(Maruve,Nicolas)
Volume uses the ellipsoid formula : height x width x length transverse
diameter x 0.52 (Phi/6 =0.52)
68 y/o ; 255 g
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
ANATOMY OF THE
PROSTATE
77 465 grams
66 y/o 275 grams
ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
ANATOMY OF
THE PROSTATE
ESUR/ACR
GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR
GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR
GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR
GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR
GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR GUIDELINES V2
ESUR/ACR GUIDELINES V2
PI-RADS DEFINITION OF TOTAL SCORE
PI RADS CLASSIFICATION DEFINITION
1 MOST PPROBABLLY BENIGN
2 PROBABLY BENIGN
3 INDETERMINATE , EQUIVOCAL
4 PROBABLY MALIGNANT
5 HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS OF
MALIGNANCY,
MRI SPECTROSCOPY
1. ESUR v1
2. Citrate is synthesized and stored in large quantities in normal glandular
tissue of the prostate and is therefore used as an organ marker for
healthy prostate tissue.
3. Choline refers to the sum of choline-containing compounds. The
intensity of choline reflects the extent of membrane turnover and is
significantly elevated in cancerous tissue.
STAGING THE PROSTATE CANCER
STAGING THE PROSTATE CANCER
T1: too small to be seen , T3: T3a,has broken through the capsule
biopsy + T3b, has spread into de seminal vesicle
T2: T2a: in only half of one lobe . T4: spread into other body organs nearby, such
T2b: more than half of one lobe. as rectum , bladder, muscles or side of
T2c: more than one lobe pelvis
EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION MAKE A T3
Criteria for extracapsular extension :
Irregular bulge in the capsule.
Obliteration of the recto prostatic angle
Asymmetry in the neurovascular bundle
Angulation /step off appearance
Focal capsular retraction or thickening
Breach of the capsule with evidence of tumour extension
LENGTH OF CASPSULAR CONTACT WITH A CUT OFF =15 MM
STAGING AND RISK GROUP
I Have Heard That Other Factors May Be Included When Evaluating
Treatment.
Yes, other factors such as the number of biopsies and the presence of Gleason
Score 7 (4+3) versus a Gleason Score (3+4) may influence the treatment
decision. The number of + biopsies is also strongly predictive of outcomes but
not typically part of the risk grouping systems. An example would be a person
with a multiple + biopsies (>34%-50%) Gleason 7. His cancer would be
considered a High Intermediate Risk and require a combination of External
Beam and radiation while another patient with only a few + biopsies (< 34%-
50%) could be a Low Intermediate Risk patient and be a good candidate for
an implant alone. These factors should be discussed with you
doctor.(Prostate cancer center of Seattle)
Summarised: multiple biopsies >34% and more than 5 mm are high risk
factors.
Gleason 4+3=7 or higher, PSA >20 ng and more important ,T3 or higher.
STAGING AND RISK GROUP
What is My Risk Group?
Low, Intermediate and High Risk groups have been identified by NCCN (National
Comprehensive Cancer Network) and D’Amico classifications.
Low Risk: (NCCN and D’Amico) – PSA < 10.0 And Gleason Score < 7 cT1c-T2a
Intermediate Risk: NCCN – PSA > 10.0 < 20.0 And/Or Gleason = 7 And/Or cT2b-
c D’Amico – PSA > 10.0 < 20.0 And/Or Gleason = 7 And/Or cT2b
High Risk: NCCN – PSA > 20.0 And/Or Gleason 8-10 And/Or cT3 Or 2 or More
Intermediate Risk Features D’Amico – PSA > 20.0 And/Or Gleason 8-10
And/Or cT2c-T3
STAGING PROSTATE CANCER
Very low risk clinically localized prostate cancer is defined as disease detected
by
biopsy only (no abnormalities detected on rectal examination or imaging),
Gleason
score of 6 or less on biopsy and a serum PSA <10ng/ml. Within the prostate, the
extent of disease must be limited (fewer than three positive biopsy cores with less
than 50% involvement in any core and a PSA density of less than 0.15
ng/mL/gram.2
Low risk, clinically localized prostate cancer is disease limited to one lobe of the
prostate or with no apparent tumor (diagnosis based only on biopsy, serum PSA
< 10
ng/ml and a Gleason score ≤ 6.
STAGING PROSTATE CANCER
low-risk PCa (clinical stage T1–T2a, biopsy Gleason score 6 or less, and PSA
less than 10 ng/mL); 556 (35.7%) had intermediate-risk disease (clinical
stage T2b – T2c, biopsy Gleason score 7, or PSA 10–20 ng/mL); and 343
(22%) had high-risk PCa (clinical stage T3a, biopsy Gleason score 8–10, or
PSA greater than 20 ng/mL).
The researchers designated intermediate-risk PCa as unfavorable if it met at
least 1 of the following 2 criteria: biopsy Gleason score 4 + 3 and/or presence
of 2 or more intermediate-risk criteria. All other men with intermediate-risk
PCa were designated as having favorable intermediate-risk disease
T2 MRI NORMAL TRANSITIONAL ZONE 58 Y/O
T2 MRI NORMAL TRANSITIONAL ZONE 58Y/O
T2 AX NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
T2 AX NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
T2 COR NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
T2 SAG NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
ADC AX : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
B1400X : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
DCE AX : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
DCE AX : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
PROSTATE CANCER :AFS
1. The anterior fibromuscular stroma is devoid of glands .
2. Could form up to 30% of the gland .
3. No prostate tumour arise from it apart of the very rare sarcomas.
4. Could be affected by tumour arising from the anterior PZ or the anterior
TZ .
5. Low signal on T2W.
PROSTATE CANCER TZ
1. The central zone surrounds the ejaculatory ducts and consist of 25%
of the glandular tissue and origins 1-8% of prostate cancer and the TZ
the 20%.
2. The TZ surrounds the urethra and the epithelium consist of transitional
cells similar to bladder epithelium.
3. The most common patter is benign prostatic hyperplasia where there
are well defined nodules , hyperintense when made of hyperplasic
glands or hypointense when they are made of hyperplastic stroma .
4. Most of the cases will show enhancement .
5. The most common report for TZ will be PI-RADS 2 , probably benign .
PROSTATE CANCER TZ
The dominant sequence would be the T2 followed by DWI .
TZ: 60 Y/O ; PSA =?,> , DRE BPH 28GR
AFM heart shaped , PI-RADS 1
TZ: 63 Y/O ; PSA =4.53 , DRE BPH 61GR
Thick AFS, PI-RADS 2
TZ: 68 Y/O ; PSA =17 , DRE : NAD ,48GR
PI-RADS 5 , charcoal sign , had prostatectomy, artefacts on DWI due to THR
TZ: 66 Y/O ; PSA =11 , DRE : LEFT FIRM
,82GR
PI-RADS 5 , charcoal sign , capsular invasion , bladder invasion
TZ: 66 Y/O ; PSA =11 , DRE : LEFT FIRM
,82GR
PI-RADS 5 , charcoal sign , capsular invasion , bladder invasion
TZ: 69 Y/O ; PSA =8 , DRE BPH 65GR
28/10/15
30/12/16
PI-RADS 3 , equivocal
PI-RADS 1, most probably
TZ: 76 Y/O ; PSA =6.58 , DRE : FIRM LEFT
61GR
Lenticular shaped PI-RADS 4
TZ: 72 Y/O ; PSA =7 , DRE : BPH, 73GR
Right anterior apex –mid gland PI-RADS 5
TZ: 72 Y/O ; PSA =7 , DRE : BPH, 73GR
Right anterior apex –mid gland PI-RADS
5
TZ: 74 Y/O ; PSA 2014 =6 , 2015= 9 ; DRE
BPH 25GR
PI-RADS 1 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 5+4=9
TZ: 75 Y/O ;PSA 2015 =9 ,2016= 11 ; DRE
BPH ,25G
PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 5+4=9
TZ: 75 Y/O ;PSA 2015 =9 ,2016= 11 ; DRE
BPH ,25G
PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 5+4=9
No
Enhancement
TZ: 72 Y/O ;PSA 7 ; DRE BPH ,43G
TZ: 72 Y/O ;PSA 7 ; DRE BPH ,43G
PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason
3+3=6
TZ: 76 Y/O ;PSA 42 ; DRE : BPH ; FIRM,34G
TZ: 76 Y/O ;PSA 42 ; DRE : BPH ; FIRM,34G
PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 3+4=7
TZ: 56 Y/O ;PSA 14 ; DRE : FIRM,32 G
TZ: 56 Y/O ;PSA 14 ; DRE : FIRM;32 G
PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 4+3=7
TZ: 70 Y/O ;PSA FROM 4 TO 8 14 ; DRE :
BPH, 47G
Charcoal sign
TZ: 70 Y/O ;PSA FROM 4 TO 8 14 ; DRE :
BPH, 47G
PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 4+3=7
TZ: 79 Y/O ;PSA 12.5 ; DRE : FIRM ,BPE,
54G
charcoal sign
TZ: 79 Y/O ;PSA 12.5 ; DRE : FIRM ,BPE,
54G
PI-RADS 5, charcoal sign
TZ: 74 Y/O ;PSA 22 ; DRE : FIRM , 74G
charcoal sign
TZ: 74 Y/O ;PSA 22 ; DRE : FIRM , 74G
PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 4+3=7
EXTERNAL BEEN RADIATION : F/U MRI 8
MONTHS LATER: PSA FROM 22 TO 0.7 AND
PROSTATE FROM 74 G TO 46 G.
TZ: 68 Y/O ;PSA 26 ; DRE : FIRM , 47G
PI-RADS 5 , capsular and seminal vesicle invasion , bony mets, Gleason
4+5=9
TZ: 68 Y/O ;PSA 26 ; DRE : FIRM , 47G
PI-RADS 5 , capsular and seminal vesicle invasion , bony mets, Gleason 4+5=9
TZ: 68 Y/O ;PSA 26 ; DRE : FIRM , 47G
15 months later ,PI-RADS 5 , capsular and seminal vesicle invasion , bony
mets, Gleason 4+5=9
PROSTATE CANCER CENTRAL ZONE
69 Y/O , PSA 5.3; DRE FIRM RIGHT LOBE ;
DILATED DUCT AND LOW SIGNAL. PI-RADS 4
PROSTATE CANCER:PZ
From 70-80% of adenocarcinoma arise in the PZ
The dominant sequence would be the DWI followed by the T2
The most common report would be PI-RADS 1 .
PZ ( R MID GLAND): 67 Y/O ;PSA 5.16 ; DRE
: BPH , 36G
PI-RADS 3+1=4 ; Gleason 3+3 =6
PZ ( R POSTERIOR APEX): 67 Y/O ;PSA 19 ;
DRE : BPH , 39G
PI-RADS 3 ; Gleason 4+4 =8, in both posterior apex
PZ ( R POSTERIOR APEX): 61 Y/O ;PSA
HIGH ;
DRE : BPH , 28G
PI-RADS 3 +1 ; Gleason 3+3=6
PZ ( R PL MID GLAND ): 72 Y/O ;PSA 3.9 ;
DRE : NODULE LEFT LOBE , 96G
PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+3=6
PZ ( LEFT ANT APEX ): 72 Y/O ;PSA 5.5 ;
DRE : SMALL AND FIRM R>L , 76G
PI-RADS 4 ; Gleason 3+3 .
PZ +TZ COMPLETE : 75 Y/O ;PSA 16 ;
DRE : BPH , 54G
PZ +TZ COMPLETE : 75 Y/O ;PSA 16 ;
DRE : BPH , 54G
PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+4=7 but length capsular contact >15
and
Seminal vesicle invasion.
PZ : (LEFT PM BASE AND MID GLAND) : 72
Y/O ;PSA 10 ; MODERATE DRE : BPH , 29G
PI-RADS % ; Gleason 3+4=7
PZ (R POST APEX/MID GLAND)60 Y/O; PSA
11;
DRE: R FIRM , 40G
PZ (R POST APEX/MID GLAND)60 Y/O; PSA
11;
DRE: R FIRM , 40G
PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+4, capsular contact 20 mm on sag
PZ (L POST LAT APEX)73 Y/O; PSA 11;
DRE: BPH , 32G
PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+4=7 ; bladder polyp
PZ (R POST LAT APEX/MID GLAND )58 Y/O;
PSA 3.7; DRE: BPH , 19G
PI-RADS 4; Gleason
3+4=7
PZ (R POST LAT APEX )62 Y/O; PSA 4.8;
DRE: BPH , 65G
PI-RADS 3+1=4; Gleason 3+4
PZ (R POST LAT MID GLAND )69 Y/O; PSA
5.9 ; DRE: NODULE RIGHT APEX , 43G
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 3+4
PZ (R POST LAT MID GLAND )69 Y/O; PSA
5.9 ; DRE: NODULE RIGHT APEX , 43G
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 3+4
PZ (R POST LAT APEX/MID GLAND )69 Y/O;
PSA 15 ; DRE: FIRM , 114G
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+4=8, length of capsular contact>15mm
PZ (R POST LAT APEX/MID GLAND )69 Y/O;
PSA 15 ; DRE: FIRM , 114G
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+4=8, length of capsular
contact>15mm
PZ (BASE B/L )78 Y/O; PSA 6 ; DRE: FIRM ,
22G,TURP 2008
PI-RADS 1 ; Gleason 4+4= B/L, apex and base
PZ (R PL/ANTERIOR APEX ) 68 Y/O; PSA 5.4
; DRE: NODULAR R SIDE , 24G,FH: FATHER
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 5+4=9 ; length capsular contact 17 mm
PZ (R PL MID-GLAND AND LEFT PL
MID/APEX ) 72 Y/O; PSA 5.6 ; DRE:
IRREG.RIGHT LOBE 58G
PI-RADS 5, Right Gleason 5, left Gleason 4=9, length capsular contact 26mm
PZ (R PL MID-GLAND AND LEFT PL
MID/APEX ) 72 Y/O; PSA 5.6 ; DRE: IRREG.
RIGHT LOBE,58G
PI-RADS 5, Right: Gleason 5, left Gleason 4=9 , length capsular contact 26mm
PZ (L PL APEX ) 66 Y/O; PSA 7 ;
DRE: FIRM LEFT LOBE,38G
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+3=7; length capsular contact 18 mm , fat effacement.
PZ (L PL APEX ,R PL BASE ) 66 Y/O; PSA 19
;
DRE: NODULE RIGHT BASE,45G
Left apex :PI-RADS 4 ; Gleason 4+3, length capsular contact 15 mm
PZ (L PL APEX ,R PL BASE ) 66 Y/O; PSA 19
;
DRE: NODULE RIGHT BASE,45G
Right PL base : PI-RADS 3+1=4;Gleason 4+3=7
PZ (L PL APEX ) 59 Y/O; PSA 5.2; DRE:
BPH,32G
PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+3=7
PZ TZ(L LOBE ) 68 Y/O; PSA 70 ;
DRE: APEX FIRM,36G
PI-RADS 5,large mass 39 x 26 mm , left seminal vesicle invasion ,Gleason 4+4
PZ TZ(L LOBE ) 68 Y/O; PSA 70 ;
DRE: APEX FIRM,36G
PI-RADS 5,large mass 39 x 26 mm , left seminal vesicle invasion ,Gleason 4+4.
MULTIFOCAL ,79 Y/O; PSA 39 ;
DRE: NODULAR MALIGNANT ,78G
PI-RADS 5 elsewhere , Gleason 5+5=10, length capsular contact 30
mm .
Probably invading rectal wall , left para-rectal fat lymph node
MULTIFOCAL ,79 Y/O; PSA 39 ;
DRE: NODULAR MALIGNANT ,78G
PI-RADS 5 elsewhere , Gleason 5+5=10, length capsular contact 30 mm
.
Probably invading rectal wall , left para-rectal fat lymph node
MULTIFOCAL ,79 Y/O; PSA 39 ;
DRE: NODULAR MALIGNANT ,78G
PI-RADS 5 elsewhere , Gleason 5+5=10, length capsular contact 30 mm .
Probably invading rectal wall , left para-rectal fat lymph node
OTHER TUMOURS
Lymphoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma: 37
years old; PSA 2.5 , DRE
nodular
OTHER TUMOURS
Prostatic cystadenoma ; 74 y/o; awaiting PSA
CHECK FOR :
1. Length of capsular contact.
2. Seminal vesicle invasion : T2 hypointense and enhancement.
3. Recto-prostatic interphase
4. Neurovascular bundle at position 5 and 7 o’clock
5. Lymphadenopathy
6. Bony lesions
7. Benign prostate findings
8. Incidental findings
CHECK FOR LENGTH OF CAPSULAR
CONTACT
CHECK FOR SEMINAL VESICLE INVASION
CHECK FOR RECTO-PROSTATIC
INTERPHASE
CHECK FOR NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE
CHECK FOR LYMPHADENOPATHY
CHECK FOR BONY METASTASIS
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
1. Prostatitis: biopsy results, mimics ca
2. Granulomatous prostatitis
3. Corpora amilacea calcification
4. Utricle cyst : tear drop shape in sagittal
5. Mullerian duct cyst : lateral to the midline
6. Ejaculatory cyst: more lateral
7. Retention cyst at the periphery
8. abscess
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
GRANUMOLATOUS PROSTATITIS : 74 Y/O , PSA not yet ; MRI EXTENSIVE
PI-RADS 5; PATHOLOGY : EXTENSIVE GRANULOMATOUS
PROSTATITIS
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
Corpora amilacea calcification and prostatitis
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
Cysts
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
Prostate abscess : 58 y/o
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
Prostate abscess post treatment 2 months later
CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS
Prostate gland replaced by a giant haemorrhagic cyst after pelvic trauma 20
years before; 57 y/o ; PSA 5.24
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDING
Incidental finding: in :
1. Bladder
2. Lower ureters
3. Rectus/sigmoid
4. Inguinal area/spermatic cord
5. Muscle
6. Bones
7. Vessels
8. Kidney (locator sequences)
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
BLADDER
cathete
r
Uro-lift
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
BLADDER
Bladder hernia and diverticula
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
BLADDER
TCC bladder
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
URETER
Ectopic ureter , Wiegert-Meyer Law , ending in verumontanum
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
URETER
Ectopic ureter , Wiegert-Meyer Law , ending in verumontanum
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
URETER
TCC left ureter
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
KIDNEY
Left RCC spotted in a localiser sequence
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: RECTO-
SIGMOID
Diverticulosis
Rectal tumour
CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS:
ANEURYSM
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE (AS)
- Strategy that delays curative therapy for low risk disease
- In low grade 3+ 3=6 Gleason , to avoid over treatment.
- In intermediate grade (Gleason 3+4) low volume disease to delays-postpone
treatment until require
ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging
of prostatic cancer 22nd
January 2016
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE (AS)
On low-risk patient for AS, monitoring involves:
- PSA testing every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months: using PSA
velocity over 0.75ng/ml/year would allow the identification of men with
progressive disease who would benefit from a follow-up imaging exam.
- Regular DRE
- MpMRI every 2 years, very accurate detecting tumor >0.5 cc volume
ICIS: Masterclass in
Imaging of prostatic cancer
22nd January 2016
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE (AS)
- The absence of a detectable lesion (that is PI-RDAS 1,2, and probably 3)
make a patient suited for AS .
- Patient with PI-RADS 4 and 5 should not undergo AS
- Unfavourable features:
- Low mean ADC values of intra-prostatic dominant lesions are correlates with
higher Gleason scores. Cut value: 1000 micro m2/s
- A tumor contact length with the prostatic capsule of more than 15 mm
increases risk of having pathological ECE.
- PSA level> 10ng/ml
ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging
of prostatic cancer 22nd
January 2016
WATCHFUL SURVEILLANCE:
Foregoes curative therapy of prostate cancer due to attendant co-
morbidities and initiates interventions only when symptoms occur.
ICIS: Masterclass in
Imaging of prostatic cancer
22nd January 2016
PRECLUDES RADICAL SURGERY
Extensive ECE/SVI.
CT or whole body DWI for TNM staging lymphadenopathy . The
prevalence of metastasis in operated apparently N0 disease is 20-
30% in intermediate risk and 30-40% in high risk disease.
Nerve sparing surgery is usually not performed in the side of a palpable
tumor when serum PSA level >20ng or Gleason score > 8
ICIS: Masterclass in
Imaging of prostatic cancer
22nd January 2016
TREATMENT OPTIONS
A. pT2 : assuming no capsular involvement:
1. Prostatectomy : da Vinci Robotic assisted best surgical procedure.
2. Proton beam therapy + hormones : best non surgical approach. Very
expensive.
3. Image assisted Intensity modulated radiotherapy + hormones . Less
expensive and widely available.
4. Brachytherapy + hormones .
5. Gamma knife ; HIFU ; others .
B. pT3: suspicious of capsular involvement : proton beam therapy + hormones ;
IMRT+ hormones; Brachytherapy +IMRT+ hormones .
C.pT3b or higher: chemotherapy is added
Note: hormone increase the efficiency of proton beam, IMRT and brachytherapy .
SATISFACTION OF SEARCH
SATISFACTION OF SEARCH
COULD MISS IMPORTANT
FINDINGS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bibliography:
Final Recommendations Statement: prostate cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. October 2014.
Thomas R Gest , Prostate Anatomy Medscape /1923122
Raychaudhuri and Cahili, Pelvic fasciae in Urology ,RCS annals, Vol :90Issue:8, Nov 2008, pp633-637.
Kennth Iczkowski, Prostate carcinoma : core biopsies Pathology Outlines 2003-2016.
R H Oyen et al , Benign hyperplastic nodules that originates in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland ,: RSNA
Radiology , December 1993, Vol 189, issue 3 .
Jelle O. Barentz et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012: Eur(2012)22: 746-757
Jeffrey C. Weinreb et al . PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2 . Eur Urology 69
(2016) 16-40.
Jelle O.Barentz wet al. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance
Imaging and Recommendations for Use. European Urology 69 (2016) 41-49.
John Kurhanewicz at al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future. Curr.
Opin Urol.2008 January ; 18(1): 71-77.
Janet NL wt al. Sarcoma of the prostate: a single institutional review. Am J Clin Oncol, 2009 Feb; 32 (1): 27-9
Arda Kayhan et al. Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: Imaging features, detection and
staging. World/Radiol 2010 May 28; 2 (5): 180-187
M. Rothkle et al. PI-RADS Classification : Structured Reporting for MRI of the Prostate: Magneton Flash; Issue 4/2013,
30-38
Heminder Sokhi; Anwar R Padhani. Whole Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Bone Marrow Tumor detection. Magneton
Flash ; Issue 4/2013,pp6-12
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Efficacy, Limitations, and
Complications—A Systematic Review of the Literature Guillaume Ploussard a,b,c,*, Alberto Briganti d, Alexandre
de la Taille c,e, Alexander Haese f, Axel Heidenreich g, Mani Menon h, Tullio Sulser i, Ashutosh K. Tewari j,
James A. Eastham k
Hashim U Ahmed , et al . Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS):
a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet Vol:389, February 25, 2017.
CHICHESTER , WEST SUSSEX

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Screening and prostate cancer
Screening and prostate cancerScreening and prostate cancer
Screening and prostate cancerDr Ankur Shah
 
PSA test accuracy
PSA test accuracyPSA test accuracy
PSA test accuracyGaetan Lion
 
Psa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exercisePsa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exerciseJohn Voss
 
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancerApproach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancerDr Santosh Kumaraswamy
 
Biomarkers of prostate cancer with staging
Biomarkers of prostate cancer with stagingBiomarkers of prostate cancer with staging
Biomarkers of prostate cancer with stagingroysudip900
 
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtabaEAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtabaDr Ali MUJTABA
 
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiPros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiKesho Conference
 
The 4Kscore® blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer
The 4Kscore® blood test for  risk of aggressive prostate cancerThe 4Kscore® blood test for  risk of aggressive prostate cancer
The 4Kscore® blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancerOPKO Labs
 
Point counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screeningPoint counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screeningPatricia Khashayar
 
Follow up of prostatectomy versus
Follow up of prostatectomy versusFollow up of prostatectomy versus
Follow up of prostatectomy versusPriyanka Malekar
 
An introduction to prostate cancer diagnosis
An introduction to prostate cancer diagnosisAn introduction to prostate cancer diagnosis
An introduction to prostate cancer diagnosisCatherine Holborn
 
Case Study: Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Case Study: Low Risk Prostate CancerCase Study: Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Case Study: Low Risk Prostate CancerAli Bagheri
 

Tendances (19)

Screening and prostate cancer
Screening and prostate cancerScreening and prostate cancer
Screening and prostate cancer
 
PSA test accuracy
PSA test accuracyPSA test accuracy
PSA test accuracy
 
Psa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exercisePsa guideline exercise
Psa guideline exercise
 
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancerApproach to a case of localized prostate cancer
Approach to a case of localized prostate cancer
 
Biomarkers of prostate cancer with staging
Biomarkers of prostate cancer with stagingBiomarkers of prostate cancer with staging
Biomarkers of prostate cancer with staging
 
5.16.11.aggressive vs. indolent prostate tumors
5.16.11.aggressive vs. indolent prostate tumors5.16.11.aggressive vs. indolent prostate tumors
5.16.11.aggressive vs. indolent prostate tumors
 
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtabaEAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
EAU - Guidelines on Prostate Cancer dr. ali mujtaba
 
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiPros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
 
Prostate specific antigen
Prostate specific antigenProstate specific antigen
Prostate specific antigen
 
The 4Kscore® blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer
The 4Kscore® blood test for  risk of aggressive prostate cancerThe 4Kscore® blood test for  risk of aggressive prostate cancer
The 4Kscore® blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer
 
Point counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screeningPoint counterpoint in PCa screening
Point counterpoint in PCa screening
 
Prostate cancer (screening)
Prostate cancer (screening)Prostate cancer (screening)
Prostate cancer (screening)
 
Psa
PsaPsa
Psa
 
Follow up of prostatectomy versus
Follow up of prostatectomy versusFollow up of prostatectomy versus
Follow up of prostatectomy versus
 
PIVOT
PIVOTPIVOT
PIVOT
 
An introduction to prostate cancer diagnosis
An introduction to prostate cancer diagnosisAn introduction to prostate cancer diagnosis
An introduction to prostate cancer diagnosis
 
Prostrate cancer
Prostrate cancerProstrate cancer
Prostrate cancer
 
tom3
tom3tom3
tom3
 
Case Study: Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Case Study: Low Risk Prostate CancerCase Study: Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Case Study: Low Risk Prostate Cancer
 

Similaire à Prostate cancer - Vincent Batista Lemaire

Screening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostateScreening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostatePrakash Hs
 
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptxMon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptxRonitEnterprises
 
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.pptca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.pptMusaibMushtaq
 
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiPros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiKesho Conference
 
Prostate cancer molecular bio markers seminar
Prostate cancer molecular bio markers seminarProstate cancer molecular bio markers seminar
Prostate cancer molecular bio markers seminarHarshaR35
 
Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012
Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012
Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012Aieme Uam
 
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01zonmbie24456
 
Screening for prostate cancer 2018
Screening for prostate cancer 2018Screening for prostate cancer 2018
Screening for prostate cancer 2018Robert J Miller MD
 
Prostate cancer update
Prostate cancer updateProstate cancer update
Prostate cancer updateAhmed Tawfeek
 
Ca prostate presentation1
Ca prostate presentation1Ca prostate presentation1
Ca prostate presentation1Praveen Ganji
 
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent AdvancesCarcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent AdvancesRobal Lacoul
 
Discuss the value of psa & gleason score
Discuss the value of psa & gleason scoreDiscuss the value of psa & gleason score
Discuss the value of psa & gleason scoreSoliudeen Arojuraye
 
Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...
Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...
Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...KCR
 

Similaire à Prostate cancer - Vincent Batista Lemaire (20)

pca screening.pdf
pca screening.pdfpca screening.pdf
pca screening.pdf
 
Screening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostateScreening for carcinoma prostate
Screening for carcinoma prostate
 
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptxMon 8-00   Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
Mon 8-00 Prostate Cancer Screening in the Post-USPSTF Era_0.pptx
 
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.pptca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
ca prostate by Dr. Musaib Mushtaq.ppt
 
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugiPros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
Pros and cons of prostate cancer screening by mungai ngugi
 
Prostate cancer molecular bio markers seminar
Prostate cancer molecular bio markers seminarProstate cancer molecular bio markers seminar
Prostate cancer molecular bio markers seminar
 
Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012
Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012
Screening for Prostate Cancer NEJM cases 2012
 
Prostate imaging
Prostate imagingProstate imaging
Prostate imaging
 
Cancer screening for seniors
Cancer screening for seniorsCancer screening for seniors
Cancer screening for seniors
 
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
Prostate2013 130412164034-phpapp01
 
Screening for prostate cancer 2018
Screening for prostate cancer 2018Screening for prostate cancer 2018
Screening for prostate cancer 2018
 
Prostate cancer update
Prostate cancer updateProstate cancer update
Prostate cancer update
 
Ca prostate presentation1
Ca prostate presentation1Ca prostate presentation1
Ca prostate presentation1
 
Prostate Cancer.pptx
Prostate Cancer.pptxProstate Cancer.pptx
Prostate Cancer.pptx
 
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent AdvancesCarcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
Carcinoma Prostate – Recent Advances
 
Repeat PSA testing
Repeat PSA testing Repeat PSA testing
Repeat PSA testing
 
Discuss the value of psa & gleason score
Discuss the value of psa & gleason scoreDiscuss the value of psa & gleason score
Discuss the value of psa & gleason score
 
Medco CE - Prostate Cancer
Medco CE - Prostate CancerMedco CE - Prostate Cancer
Medco CE - Prostate Cancer
 
Overdiagnosis in cancer
Overdiagnosis in cancerOverdiagnosis in cancer
Overdiagnosis in cancer
 
Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...
Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...
Prostate Cancer - Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-Resis...
 

Dernier

POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptxPOST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptxvirengeeta
 
world health day presentation ppt download
world health day presentation ppt downloadworld health day presentation ppt download
world health day presentation ppt downloadAnkitKumar311566
 
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!ibtesaam huma
 
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️saminamagar
 
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptxThe next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptxTina Purnat
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiGoogle
 
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptxInformed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptxSasikiranMarri
 
Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...
Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...
Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...Badalona Serveis Assistencials
 
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...saminamagar
 
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptxCOVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptxBibekananda shah
 
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptxCulture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsMedicoseAcademics
 
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptxGlomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptxDr.Nusrat Tariq
 
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxMeasurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?bkling
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.ANJALI
 
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptxReport Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptxbkling
 
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingPharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingArunagarwal328757
 

Dernier (20)

POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptxPOST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
POST NATAL EXERCISES AND ITS IMPACT.pptx
 
world health day presentation ppt download
world health day presentation ppt downloadworld health day presentation ppt download
world health day presentation ppt download
 
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
Biomechanics- Shoulder Joint!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Epilepsy
EpilepsyEpilepsy
Epilepsy
 
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptxThe next social challenge to public health:  the information environment.pptx
The next social challenge to public health: the information environment.pptx
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
 
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptxInformed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
Informed Consent Empowering Healthcare Decision-Making.pptx
 
Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...
Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...
Presentació "Real-Life VR Integration for Mild Cognitive Impairment Rehabilit...
 
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...call girls in Connaught Place  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
call girls in Connaught Place DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service ...
 
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptxCOVID-19  (NOVEL CORONA  VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
COVID-19 (NOVEL CORONA VIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC ).pptx
 
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptxCulture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
 
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes FunctionsHematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
Hematology and Immunology - Leukocytes Functions
 
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptxGlomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
Glomerular Filtration rate and its determinants.pptx
 
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptxMeasurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
Measurement of Radiation and Dosimetric Procedure.pptx
 
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
Let's Talk About It: To Disclose or Not to Disclose?
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
 
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
 
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptxReport Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
Report Back from SGO: What’s New in Uterine Cancer?.pptx
 
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingPharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
 

Prostate cancer - Vincent Batista Lemaire

  • 1. PI-RADS PROSTATE IMAGING-REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM: 2015,VERSION 2 Dr. Vincent Batista Lemaire Locum Consultant Radiologist St. Richards Hospital ,West Sussex Hospitals Trust, NHS . Chichester , England , UK .
  • 2. PI-RADS PROSTATE IMAGING-REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM: 2015,VERSION 2 F R O M C O L L A B O R A T I O N O F A M E R I C A N C O L L E G E O F R A D I O L O G Y ( A C R ) , E U R O P E A N S O C I E T Y O F U R O R A D I O L O G Y ( E S U R ) A N D A D M E T E C H F O U N D A T I O N
  • 3. WHY THE PI-RADS Global standardization Diminish variation in : * acquisition *interpretation * reporting
  • 4. - Worldwide , there are and estimated 1,600,000 new cases of prostate cancer and 366,000 prostate cancer death annually, making it the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and the seventh leading cause of male cancer death . - Prostate cancer is the second most commonly cancer diagnosed in the United States after skin cancer, with 161,000 new prostate cancer diagnoses and approximately 26,700 prostate cancer deaths. - 1 in 6 men would develop prostate cancer in their lifetime; however , only 1 in 34 men would die from prostate cancer. - Good prognosis but some are aggressive . - 70% of death due to prostate cancer occur after age 75.
  • 5. - Older age is the strongest risk factor for the development of prostate cancer. - Black men are twice as likely to die of prostate cancer than other men. - Family history have an increase risk of 2.5 fold - The risk of prostate cancer among men with elevated PSA levels is lower in men with urinary symptoms than in men without symptoms.
  • 6. How to make the diagnosis and deliver the best preventive and treatment options?
  • 8. Sensitivity is the number of true positive results divided by the sum of the true positive results and false negative results . Specificity is the number of true negative results divided by the sum of the true negative results and false positive results . Our primary goal is to find a screening strategy that will improve sensitivity without sacrificing specificity.
  • 10. One study of 6,630 men volunteering for DRE and prostate-specific antigen screening tests, 45% of the cancers that were detected were missed by the DRE. Other authors have reported finding cancer in 15% to 18% of men with a normal DRE. If a lump is found, the chances are about 1 in 4 that it is cancerous. Abnormal prostate findings include nodules, asymmetry, or induration. DRE can detect tumours in the posterior and lateral aspects of the prostate gland; an inherent limitation to the digital examination is that only 85 percent of cancers arise peripherally where they can be detected with a finger examination [86]. Stage T1 cancers are non palpable by definition. Digital rectal exam
  • 11. DIGITAL RECTAL EXAM A new study found that, while not 100% accurate, digital rectal examination (DRE) should remain a standard for screening for prostate cancer and may even be able to identify cases of the disease that are not picked up by the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test. The results of the study were reported in The Canadian Journal of Urology. Our study confirms that the digital rectal exam remains an important part of screening such patients because 31 percent of cancers in our study would have been missed by using age-specific PSA cut offs alone,” Raman said
  • 12. The DRE is also inexpensive, costing approximately $28 (Crawford et. al. 1999). Though it is readily available by appointment in a doctor's office, there is discomfort for the patient and a risk of slight bleeding (American Cancer Society 2006). With the DRE test, the experience of the doctor is of utmost importance, yet, new, inexperienced urologists often perform the test. The sensitivity is 27.1% and the specificity is 49.0% (Marcus 2004). Digital rectal exam
  • 13. PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) — PSA is a glycoprotein produced by prostate epithelial cells. In men with prostate cancer PSA production is increased and the tissue barriers between the prostate gland lumen and the capillary are disrupted. PSA elevations can precede clinical disease by 5 to 10 years. Screening: beginning at age 50, though not with men who have a comorbidity that limits their life expectancy to less than 10 years . We suggest that providers first discuss screening with men at high risk for prostate cancer, including black men, men with a family history of prostate cancer, particularly in relatives younger than age 65, and men who are known or likely to have the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, beginning at age 40 to 45. PSA
  • 14. PSA *The PSA test is simply a blood test, widely available to the general population. * It is costs the patient roughly $30 to $60. * The sensitivity is 64% and the specificity is 91% .
  • 15. PSA Serum PSA levels were considered normal if they fell into specific thresholds based on age : <50 years, PSA <2.5 ng/mL; 51-60 years, PSA <3.5 ng/mL; 61-70 years, PSA <4.5 ng/mL; and >70 years, PSA <6.5 ng/mL).
  • 16. PSA The traditional cut off for an abnormal PSA level in the major screening studies has been 4.0 ng/mL. . In a pooled analysis, the estimated sensitivity of a PSA cut off of 4.0 ng/mL was 21 percent for detecting any prostate cancer and 51 percent for detecting high-grade cancers (Gleason ≥8). Using a cut off of 3.0 ng/mL increased these sensitivities to 32 and 68 percent, respectively. The estimated specificity was 91 percent for a PSA cut off of 4.0 ng/mL and 85 percent for a 3.0 ng/mL cut off. PSA has poorer discriminating ability in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia [48].
  • 17. PSA: NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK :GUIDELINES 2014 1. Baseline testing at age 45-49 years with retesting at 50 years in patent with a level below 0.7ng/ml. 2. Annual or biannual retesting in those with a level of 1.0ng/ml or higher. 3. For patient aged 50-70 years with a normal RE and PSA below 3 ng/ml, the NCCN recommends retesting every 1-2 years.
  • 18. ELEVATED PSA - DRE : transient elevation from 0.26 to 0.4ng/ml - Ejaculation : can increase PSA levels by up to 0.8 ng/mL, though levels return to normal within 48 hours. -Bacterial prostatitis; Asymptomatic prostatic inflammation can also elevate PSA levels, but this diagnosis is made on biopsy and so cannot generally be used to defer screening -Prostate biopsy , transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): A screening PSA test should not be performed for at least six weeks following either of these procedures. -Acute urinary retention.
  • 19. PSA PSA: relatively low sensibility , increased PSA is not equivalent with tumour.. Screening is controversial: over diagnosis and overtreatment
  • 20.
  • 21. TRUS biopsies based on a systematic approach tend to target the peripheral aspects of the gland and are likely to miss 30-40% of prostate cancer located in the anterior, midline transition zone, or apex. Today, however, many tumours are being identified at a very early stage, often as extremely small lesions that are hard to spot on ultrasound and hard to sample using a TRUS biopsy alone. "If we adopted this approach, we could reduce the number of men needing biopsies by 50% (223 vs 109), we could reduce the biopsy cores we took by 80% (2672 vs 322) and, most importantly, we could reduce the diagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer by up to 90% (47 vs 5), and still we'd find 12% more intermediate- to high-risk cancers (79 vs 89). “For patients with intermediate- to high-risk cancer, the estimated sensitivity of MRI plus biopsy was 92.34% — "far outperforming that of the TRUS plus biopsy (70.44%)," said TRUS BIOPSY
  • 25. *Clinically significant cancer was defined as Gleason score 4+3 or a maximum cancer core length of 6 mm or longer . *MRI picks up 93% of aggressive cancers , compared with 48% for biopsy. *More than a quarter (27%) of all men with suspected cancer could avoid a biopsy . *If subsequent TRUS-biopsy were directed by MP-MRI findings, up to 18% more cases of significant cancer might be detected .
  • 26. GLEASON SCORE AND ZONAL ANATOMY
  • 27. The scoring system is named after Donald Gleason (1920-2008), a pathologist at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Hospital, who developed it with colleagues at that facility in the 1960s. In 2005, the Gleason system was altered by the International Society of Urological Pathology. The criteria were refined and the attribution of certain patterns changed. It has been shown that this 'modified Gleason score' has higher performance than the original one, and is currently assumed standard in urological pathology. Gleason grading system
  • 28. GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM A total score is calculated based on how cells look under a microscope, with half the score based on the appearance of the most common cell morphology (scored 1—5), and the other half based off the appearance of the second most common cell morphology (scored 1—5). These two numbers are then combined to produce a total score for the cancer. The Gleason Grade/Score has two main points: 1: Based on architectural patterns, rather than cytological ones. The second feature of Gleason grading is that the grade is not based on the highest (least differentiated) pattern within the tumor, instead it is a combination of the most often and second most often patterns seen. Gleason realized that prostatic carcinomas have multiple patterns and that the prognosis of prostatic carcinoma was split between the most prevalent and the second most prevalent neoplasm pattern.
  • 29. GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM What does it mean? A Gleason score A 2 and 6 is a low grade prostate cancer, likely to grow very slowly. A Gleason score of 7 is an intermediate grade that will grow at a moderate rate. A Gleason score of 8 to 10 is a high grade cancer that is likely to grow more quickly. If your Gleason score is low and you are older or have early stage disease your urologist is likely to suggest active monitoring rather than surgery or radiotherapy. This is because your cancer may not spread or have any impact upon your health. If you have a high Gleason score, are younger or have higher stage disease, your urologist is more likely to suggest you have active treatment.
  • 30. GLEASON 3+4 AND GLEASON 4+3 Despite the confusing numbering system, 3+3 is the lowest possible Gleason score reported today. 3+3 doesn't metastasize, and some pathologists, therefore, don't even think it should be called "cancer." It is generally, depending on other case characteristics, low-risk. Gleason scores that add up to 7 are generally intermediate risk. 3+4 is generally a favourable intermediate risk, and 4+3 is generally an unfavourable intermediate risk. The difference is the amount of Gleason pattern 4 cells present. The more pattern 4, the more aggressive the tumor. 3+4 means less than 50% pattern 4, and 4+3 means greater than 50% pattern 4.
  • 33. GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM 1. Multifocal and heterogeneous cancer is common , occurring in 60% 2. Cancer with high Gleason score are more likely to exhibit pronounced imaging characteristic on mpMRI with accordingly high PI-RADS scores. 3. Early stage Gleason score 3+ 3, mpMRI does poorly .
  • 34. ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE GLAND John E Mc Neal ,1930- 2005, worked at Standford
  • 35. ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE GLAND
  • 36. ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE GLAND
  • 37. DUCTS AND ZONAL ANATOMY
  • 38. ZONAL ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 39. FASCIA AROUND THE PROSTATE 1.prostatic fascia: anteriorly and antero-laterally , it is in direct continuity with the fibromuscular stroma . 2.Laterally : it fuses with the endopelvic fascia. 3.posteriorly , it fuses with , and is indistinguishable from , Denonvilliers fascia with lies between the prostate and the rectum and covers the seminal vesicle posteriorly .
  • 40. PELVIC FASCIAE IN UROLOGY B RAYCHAUDHURI AND D CAHILL THE ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND 2008 90:8, 633-637 The findings of the study were as follows: The ‘capsule’ of the prostate does not exist. Rather, the fibromuscular band surrounding the prostate forms an integral part of the gland. The prostate is surrounded by fascial structures – anteriorly/anterolaterally by the prostatic fascia and posteriorly by the Denonvilliers' fascia. Laterally, the prostatic fascia merges with the endopelvic fascia. The posterior longitudinal fascia of the detrusor comprises a ‘posterior layer’ of the detrusor apron, extending from the bladder neck to the prostate base. The neurovascular structures tend to be located posterolaterally, at 5 and 7 o’clock ,but may not always form a bundle. A significant proportion of fibres may lie away from the main nerve structures, along the lateral/posterior aspects of the prostate.
  • 42. PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer is the most effective method for detecting lymph node metastases The accuracy of standard imaging modalities such as computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting nodal metastases remains poor.
  • 43. MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI  Axial T1 LFOV Pelvis  Axial, coronal, (sagittal) T2 SFOV Prostate  Axial DWI (b=0,150,500,1000) with ADC map  High b value (b1400, b2000)  Volume T1 fat sat (VIBE) pre- and dynamic post-contrast
  • 44. MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI 1. It is not intended to make a diagnosis . 2. The main goal is to suggest the target site in patient with suspicious findings .
  • 46. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 47. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 48. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 49. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 50. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE A normal prostate gland is approximately 20 gr in volume, 3 cms in length, 4 cms wide and 2 cms depth . The base of the gland is in continuity to the bladder, and anterior to the rectum. The prostate ends at the apex before becoming the striated external urethral sphincter. The sphincter is a vertically oriented tubular sheath that surrounds the membranous urethra and prostate.(Maruve,Nicolas) Volume uses the ellipsoid formula : height x width x length transverse diameter x 0.52 (Phi/6 =0.52) 68 y/o ; 255 g
  • 51. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 52. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE 77 465 grams 66 y/o 275 grams
  • 53. ANATOMY OF THE PROSTATE
  • 64. ESUR/ACR GUIDELINES V2 PI-RADS DEFINITION OF TOTAL SCORE PI RADS CLASSIFICATION DEFINITION 1 MOST PPROBABLLY BENIGN 2 PROBABLY BENIGN 3 INDETERMINATE , EQUIVOCAL 4 PROBABLY MALIGNANT 5 HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS OF MALIGNANCY,
  • 65. MRI SPECTROSCOPY 1. ESUR v1 2. Citrate is synthesized and stored in large quantities in normal glandular tissue of the prostate and is therefore used as an organ marker for healthy prostate tissue. 3. Choline refers to the sum of choline-containing compounds. The intensity of choline reflects the extent of membrane turnover and is significantly elevated in cancerous tissue.
  • 67. STAGING THE PROSTATE CANCER T1: too small to be seen , T3: T3a,has broken through the capsule biopsy + T3b, has spread into de seminal vesicle T2: T2a: in only half of one lobe . T4: spread into other body organs nearby, such T2b: more than half of one lobe. as rectum , bladder, muscles or side of T2c: more than one lobe pelvis
  • 68. EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION MAKE A T3 Criteria for extracapsular extension : Irregular bulge in the capsule. Obliteration of the recto prostatic angle Asymmetry in the neurovascular bundle Angulation /step off appearance Focal capsular retraction or thickening Breach of the capsule with evidence of tumour extension LENGTH OF CASPSULAR CONTACT WITH A CUT OFF =15 MM
  • 69. STAGING AND RISK GROUP I Have Heard That Other Factors May Be Included When Evaluating Treatment. Yes, other factors such as the number of biopsies and the presence of Gleason Score 7 (4+3) versus a Gleason Score (3+4) may influence the treatment decision. The number of + biopsies is also strongly predictive of outcomes but not typically part of the risk grouping systems. An example would be a person with a multiple + biopsies (>34%-50%) Gleason 7. His cancer would be considered a High Intermediate Risk and require a combination of External Beam and radiation while another patient with only a few + biopsies (< 34%- 50%) could be a Low Intermediate Risk patient and be a good candidate for an implant alone. These factors should be discussed with you doctor.(Prostate cancer center of Seattle) Summarised: multiple biopsies >34% and more than 5 mm are high risk factors. Gleason 4+3=7 or higher, PSA >20 ng and more important ,T3 or higher.
  • 70. STAGING AND RISK GROUP What is My Risk Group? Low, Intermediate and High Risk groups have been identified by NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) and D’Amico classifications. Low Risk: (NCCN and D’Amico) – PSA < 10.0 And Gleason Score < 7 cT1c-T2a Intermediate Risk: NCCN – PSA > 10.0 < 20.0 And/Or Gleason = 7 And/Or cT2b- c D’Amico – PSA > 10.0 < 20.0 And/Or Gleason = 7 And/Or cT2b High Risk: NCCN – PSA > 20.0 And/Or Gleason 8-10 And/Or cT3 Or 2 or More Intermediate Risk Features D’Amico – PSA > 20.0 And/Or Gleason 8-10 And/Or cT2c-T3
  • 71. STAGING PROSTATE CANCER Very low risk clinically localized prostate cancer is defined as disease detected by biopsy only (no abnormalities detected on rectal examination or imaging), Gleason score of 6 or less on biopsy and a serum PSA <10ng/ml. Within the prostate, the extent of disease must be limited (fewer than three positive biopsy cores with less than 50% involvement in any core and a PSA density of less than 0.15 ng/mL/gram.2 Low risk, clinically localized prostate cancer is disease limited to one lobe of the prostate or with no apparent tumor (diagnosis based only on biopsy, serum PSA < 10 ng/ml and a Gleason score ≤ 6.
  • 72. STAGING PROSTATE CANCER low-risk PCa (clinical stage T1–T2a, biopsy Gleason score 6 or less, and PSA less than 10 ng/mL); 556 (35.7%) had intermediate-risk disease (clinical stage T2b – T2c, biopsy Gleason score 7, or PSA 10–20 ng/mL); and 343 (22%) had high-risk PCa (clinical stage T3a, biopsy Gleason score 8–10, or PSA greater than 20 ng/mL). The researchers designated intermediate-risk PCa as unfavorable if it met at least 1 of the following 2 criteria: biopsy Gleason score 4 + 3 and/or presence of 2 or more intermediate-risk criteria. All other men with intermediate-risk PCa were designated as having favorable intermediate-risk disease
  • 73. T2 MRI NORMAL TRANSITIONAL ZONE 58 Y/O
  • 74. T2 MRI NORMAL TRANSITIONAL ZONE 58Y/O
  • 75. T2 AX NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 76. T2 AX NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 77. T2 COR NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 78. T2 SAG NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 79. ADC AX : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 80. B1400X : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 81. DCE AX : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 82. DCE AX : NORMAL PERIPHERAL ZONE: 65 Y/O
  • 83. PROSTATE CANCER :AFS 1. The anterior fibromuscular stroma is devoid of glands . 2. Could form up to 30% of the gland . 3. No prostate tumour arise from it apart of the very rare sarcomas. 4. Could be affected by tumour arising from the anterior PZ or the anterior TZ . 5. Low signal on T2W.
  • 84. PROSTATE CANCER TZ 1. The central zone surrounds the ejaculatory ducts and consist of 25% of the glandular tissue and origins 1-8% of prostate cancer and the TZ the 20%. 2. The TZ surrounds the urethra and the epithelium consist of transitional cells similar to bladder epithelium. 3. The most common patter is benign prostatic hyperplasia where there are well defined nodules , hyperintense when made of hyperplasic glands or hypointense when they are made of hyperplastic stroma . 4. Most of the cases will show enhancement . 5. The most common report for TZ will be PI-RADS 2 , probably benign .
  • 85. PROSTATE CANCER TZ The dominant sequence would be the T2 followed by DWI .
  • 86. TZ: 60 Y/O ; PSA =?,> , DRE BPH 28GR AFM heart shaped , PI-RADS 1
  • 87. TZ: 63 Y/O ; PSA =4.53 , DRE BPH 61GR Thick AFS, PI-RADS 2
  • 88. TZ: 68 Y/O ; PSA =17 , DRE : NAD ,48GR PI-RADS 5 , charcoal sign , had prostatectomy, artefacts on DWI due to THR
  • 89. TZ: 66 Y/O ; PSA =11 , DRE : LEFT FIRM ,82GR PI-RADS 5 , charcoal sign , capsular invasion , bladder invasion
  • 90. TZ: 66 Y/O ; PSA =11 , DRE : LEFT FIRM ,82GR PI-RADS 5 , charcoal sign , capsular invasion , bladder invasion
  • 91. TZ: 69 Y/O ; PSA =8 , DRE BPH 65GR 28/10/15 30/12/16 PI-RADS 3 , equivocal PI-RADS 1, most probably
  • 92. TZ: 76 Y/O ; PSA =6.58 , DRE : FIRM LEFT 61GR Lenticular shaped PI-RADS 4
  • 93. TZ: 72 Y/O ; PSA =7 , DRE : BPH, 73GR Right anterior apex –mid gland PI-RADS 5
  • 94. TZ: 72 Y/O ; PSA =7 , DRE : BPH, 73GR Right anterior apex –mid gland PI-RADS 5
  • 95. TZ: 74 Y/O ; PSA 2014 =6 , 2015= 9 ; DRE BPH 25GR PI-RADS 1 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 5+4=9
  • 96. TZ: 75 Y/O ;PSA 2015 =9 ,2016= 11 ; DRE BPH ,25G PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 5+4=9
  • 97. TZ: 75 Y/O ;PSA 2015 =9 ,2016= 11 ; DRE BPH ,25G PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 5+4=9 No Enhancement
  • 98. TZ: 72 Y/O ;PSA 7 ; DRE BPH ,43G
  • 99. TZ: 72 Y/O ;PSA 7 ; DRE BPH ,43G PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 3+3=6
  • 100. TZ: 76 Y/O ;PSA 42 ; DRE : BPH ; FIRM,34G
  • 101. TZ: 76 Y/O ;PSA 42 ; DRE : BPH ; FIRM,34G PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 3+4=7
  • 102. TZ: 56 Y/O ;PSA 14 ; DRE : FIRM,32 G
  • 103. TZ: 56 Y/O ;PSA 14 ; DRE : FIRM;32 G PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 4+3=7
  • 104. TZ: 70 Y/O ;PSA FROM 4 TO 8 14 ; DRE : BPH, 47G Charcoal sign
  • 105. TZ: 70 Y/O ;PSA FROM 4 TO 8 14 ; DRE : BPH, 47G PI-RADS 5 PATHOLOGY : Gleason 4+3=7
  • 106. TZ: 79 Y/O ;PSA 12.5 ; DRE : FIRM ,BPE, 54G charcoal sign
  • 107. TZ: 79 Y/O ;PSA 12.5 ; DRE : FIRM ,BPE, 54G PI-RADS 5, charcoal sign
  • 108. TZ: 74 Y/O ;PSA 22 ; DRE : FIRM , 74G charcoal sign
  • 109. TZ: 74 Y/O ;PSA 22 ; DRE : FIRM , 74G PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 4+3=7
  • 110. EXTERNAL BEEN RADIATION : F/U MRI 8 MONTHS LATER: PSA FROM 22 TO 0.7 AND PROSTATE FROM 74 G TO 46 G.
  • 111. TZ: 68 Y/O ;PSA 26 ; DRE : FIRM , 47G PI-RADS 5 , capsular and seminal vesicle invasion , bony mets, Gleason 4+5=9
  • 112. TZ: 68 Y/O ;PSA 26 ; DRE : FIRM , 47G PI-RADS 5 , capsular and seminal vesicle invasion , bony mets, Gleason 4+5=9
  • 113. TZ: 68 Y/O ;PSA 26 ; DRE : FIRM , 47G 15 months later ,PI-RADS 5 , capsular and seminal vesicle invasion , bony mets, Gleason 4+5=9
  • 114. PROSTATE CANCER CENTRAL ZONE 69 Y/O , PSA 5.3; DRE FIRM RIGHT LOBE ; DILATED DUCT AND LOW SIGNAL. PI-RADS 4
  • 115. PROSTATE CANCER:PZ From 70-80% of adenocarcinoma arise in the PZ The dominant sequence would be the DWI followed by the T2 The most common report would be PI-RADS 1 .
  • 116. PZ ( R MID GLAND): 67 Y/O ;PSA 5.16 ; DRE : BPH , 36G PI-RADS 3+1=4 ; Gleason 3+3 =6
  • 117. PZ ( R POSTERIOR APEX): 67 Y/O ;PSA 19 ; DRE : BPH , 39G PI-RADS 3 ; Gleason 4+4 =8, in both posterior apex
  • 118. PZ ( R POSTERIOR APEX): 61 Y/O ;PSA HIGH ; DRE : BPH , 28G PI-RADS 3 +1 ; Gleason 3+3=6
  • 119. PZ ( R PL MID GLAND ): 72 Y/O ;PSA 3.9 ; DRE : NODULE LEFT LOBE , 96G PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+3=6
  • 120. PZ ( LEFT ANT APEX ): 72 Y/O ;PSA 5.5 ; DRE : SMALL AND FIRM R>L , 76G PI-RADS 4 ; Gleason 3+3 .
  • 121. PZ +TZ COMPLETE : 75 Y/O ;PSA 16 ; DRE : BPH , 54G
  • 122. PZ +TZ COMPLETE : 75 Y/O ;PSA 16 ; DRE : BPH , 54G PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+4=7 but length capsular contact >15 and Seminal vesicle invasion.
  • 123. PZ : (LEFT PM BASE AND MID GLAND) : 72 Y/O ;PSA 10 ; MODERATE DRE : BPH , 29G PI-RADS % ; Gleason 3+4=7
  • 124. PZ (R POST APEX/MID GLAND)60 Y/O; PSA 11; DRE: R FIRM , 40G
  • 125. PZ (R POST APEX/MID GLAND)60 Y/O; PSA 11; DRE: R FIRM , 40G PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+4, capsular contact 20 mm on sag
  • 126. PZ (L POST LAT APEX)73 Y/O; PSA 11; DRE: BPH , 32G PI-RADS 5 ; Gleason 3+4=7 ; bladder polyp
  • 127. PZ (R POST LAT APEX/MID GLAND )58 Y/O; PSA 3.7; DRE: BPH , 19G PI-RADS 4; Gleason 3+4=7
  • 128. PZ (R POST LAT APEX )62 Y/O; PSA 4.8; DRE: BPH , 65G PI-RADS 3+1=4; Gleason 3+4
  • 129. PZ (R POST LAT MID GLAND )69 Y/O; PSA 5.9 ; DRE: NODULE RIGHT APEX , 43G PI-RADS 5; Gleason 3+4
  • 130. PZ (R POST LAT MID GLAND )69 Y/O; PSA 5.9 ; DRE: NODULE RIGHT APEX , 43G PI-RADS 5; Gleason 3+4
  • 131. PZ (R POST LAT APEX/MID GLAND )69 Y/O; PSA 15 ; DRE: FIRM , 114G PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+4=8, length of capsular contact>15mm
  • 132. PZ (R POST LAT APEX/MID GLAND )69 Y/O; PSA 15 ; DRE: FIRM , 114G PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+4=8, length of capsular contact>15mm
  • 133. PZ (BASE B/L )78 Y/O; PSA 6 ; DRE: FIRM , 22G,TURP 2008 PI-RADS 1 ; Gleason 4+4= B/L, apex and base
  • 134. PZ (R PL/ANTERIOR APEX ) 68 Y/O; PSA 5.4 ; DRE: NODULAR R SIDE , 24G,FH: FATHER PI-RADS 5; Gleason 5+4=9 ; length capsular contact 17 mm
  • 135. PZ (R PL MID-GLAND AND LEFT PL MID/APEX ) 72 Y/O; PSA 5.6 ; DRE: IRREG.RIGHT LOBE 58G PI-RADS 5, Right Gleason 5, left Gleason 4=9, length capsular contact 26mm
  • 136. PZ (R PL MID-GLAND AND LEFT PL MID/APEX ) 72 Y/O; PSA 5.6 ; DRE: IRREG. RIGHT LOBE,58G PI-RADS 5, Right: Gleason 5, left Gleason 4=9 , length capsular contact 26mm
  • 137. PZ (L PL APEX ) 66 Y/O; PSA 7 ; DRE: FIRM LEFT LOBE,38G PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+3=7; length capsular contact 18 mm , fat effacement.
  • 138. PZ (L PL APEX ,R PL BASE ) 66 Y/O; PSA 19 ; DRE: NODULE RIGHT BASE,45G Left apex :PI-RADS 4 ; Gleason 4+3, length capsular contact 15 mm
  • 139. PZ (L PL APEX ,R PL BASE ) 66 Y/O; PSA 19 ; DRE: NODULE RIGHT BASE,45G Right PL base : PI-RADS 3+1=4;Gleason 4+3=7
  • 140. PZ (L PL APEX ) 59 Y/O; PSA 5.2; DRE: BPH,32G PI-RADS 5; Gleason 4+3=7
  • 141. PZ TZ(L LOBE ) 68 Y/O; PSA 70 ; DRE: APEX FIRM,36G PI-RADS 5,large mass 39 x 26 mm , left seminal vesicle invasion ,Gleason 4+4
  • 142. PZ TZ(L LOBE ) 68 Y/O; PSA 70 ; DRE: APEX FIRM,36G PI-RADS 5,large mass 39 x 26 mm , left seminal vesicle invasion ,Gleason 4+4.
  • 143. MULTIFOCAL ,79 Y/O; PSA 39 ; DRE: NODULAR MALIGNANT ,78G PI-RADS 5 elsewhere , Gleason 5+5=10, length capsular contact 30 mm . Probably invading rectal wall , left para-rectal fat lymph node
  • 144. MULTIFOCAL ,79 Y/O; PSA 39 ; DRE: NODULAR MALIGNANT ,78G PI-RADS 5 elsewhere , Gleason 5+5=10, length capsular contact 30 mm . Probably invading rectal wall , left para-rectal fat lymph node
  • 145. MULTIFOCAL ,79 Y/O; PSA 39 ; DRE: NODULAR MALIGNANT ,78G PI-RADS 5 elsewhere , Gleason 5+5=10, length capsular contact 30 mm . Probably invading rectal wall , left para-rectal fat lymph node
  • 147. OTHER TUMOURS Prostatic cystadenoma ; 74 y/o; awaiting PSA
  • 148. CHECK FOR : 1. Length of capsular contact. 2. Seminal vesicle invasion : T2 hypointense and enhancement. 3. Recto-prostatic interphase 4. Neurovascular bundle at position 5 and 7 o’clock 5. Lymphadenopathy 6. Bony lesions 7. Benign prostate findings 8. Incidental findings
  • 149. CHECK FOR LENGTH OF CAPSULAR CONTACT
  • 150. CHECK FOR SEMINAL VESICLE INVASION
  • 154. CHECK FOR BONY METASTASIS
  • 155. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS 1. Prostatitis: biopsy results, mimics ca 2. Granulomatous prostatitis 3. Corpora amilacea calcification 4. Utricle cyst : tear drop shape in sagittal 5. Mullerian duct cyst : lateral to the midline 6. Ejaculatory cyst: more lateral 7. Retention cyst at the periphery 8. abscess
  • 156. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS GRANUMOLATOUS PROSTATITIS : 74 Y/O , PSA not yet ; MRI EXTENSIVE PI-RADS 5; PATHOLOGY : EXTENSIVE GRANULOMATOUS PROSTATITIS
  • 157. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS Corpora amilacea calcification and prostatitis
  • 158. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS Cysts
  • 159. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS Prostate abscess : 58 y/o
  • 160. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS Prostate abscess post treatment 2 months later
  • 161. CHECK FOR BENIGN PROSTATE FINDINGS Prostate gland replaced by a giant haemorrhagic cyst after pelvic trauma 20 years before; 57 y/o ; PSA 5.24
  • 162. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDING Incidental finding: in : 1. Bladder 2. Lower ureters 3. Rectus/sigmoid 4. Inguinal area/spermatic cord 5. Muscle 6. Bones 7. Vessels 8. Kidney (locator sequences)
  • 163. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: BLADDER cathete r Uro-lift
  • 164. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: BLADDER Bladder hernia and diverticula
  • 165. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: BLADDER TCC bladder
  • 166. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: URETER Ectopic ureter , Wiegert-Meyer Law , ending in verumontanum
  • 167. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: URETER Ectopic ureter , Wiegert-Meyer Law , ending in verumontanum
  • 168. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: URETER TCC left ureter
  • 169. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: KIDNEY Left RCC spotted in a localiser sequence
  • 170. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: RECTO- SIGMOID Diverticulosis Rectal tumour
  • 171. CHECK FOR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS: ANEURYSM
  • 172. ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE (AS) - Strategy that delays curative therapy for low risk disease - In low grade 3+ 3=6 Gleason , to avoid over treatment. - In intermediate grade (Gleason 3+4) low volume disease to delays-postpone treatment until require ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging of prostatic cancer 22nd January 2016
  • 173. ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE (AS) On low-risk patient for AS, monitoring involves: - PSA testing every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months: using PSA velocity over 0.75ng/ml/year would allow the identification of men with progressive disease who would benefit from a follow-up imaging exam. - Regular DRE - MpMRI every 2 years, very accurate detecting tumor >0.5 cc volume ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging of prostatic cancer 22nd January 2016
  • 174. ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE (AS) - The absence of a detectable lesion (that is PI-RDAS 1,2, and probably 3) make a patient suited for AS . - Patient with PI-RADS 4 and 5 should not undergo AS - Unfavourable features: - Low mean ADC values of intra-prostatic dominant lesions are correlates with higher Gleason scores. Cut value: 1000 micro m2/s - A tumor contact length with the prostatic capsule of more than 15 mm increases risk of having pathological ECE. - PSA level> 10ng/ml ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging of prostatic cancer 22nd January 2016
  • 175. WATCHFUL SURVEILLANCE: Foregoes curative therapy of prostate cancer due to attendant co- morbidities and initiates interventions only when symptoms occur. ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging of prostatic cancer 22nd January 2016
  • 176. PRECLUDES RADICAL SURGERY Extensive ECE/SVI. CT or whole body DWI for TNM staging lymphadenopathy . The prevalence of metastasis in operated apparently N0 disease is 20- 30% in intermediate risk and 30-40% in high risk disease. Nerve sparing surgery is usually not performed in the side of a palpable tumor when serum PSA level >20ng or Gleason score > 8 ICIS: Masterclass in Imaging of prostatic cancer 22nd January 2016
  • 177. TREATMENT OPTIONS A. pT2 : assuming no capsular involvement: 1. Prostatectomy : da Vinci Robotic assisted best surgical procedure. 2. Proton beam therapy + hormones : best non surgical approach. Very expensive. 3. Image assisted Intensity modulated radiotherapy + hormones . Less expensive and widely available. 4. Brachytherapy + hormones . 5. Gamma knife ; HIFU ; others . B. pT3: suspicious of capsular involvement : proton beam therapy + hormones ; IMRT+ hormones; Brachytherapy +IMRT+ hormones . C.pT3b or higher: chemotherapy is added Note: hormone increase the efficiency of proton beam, IMRT and brachytherapy .
  • 179. SATISFACTION OF SEARCH COULD MISS IMPORTANT FINDINGS
  • 180. BIBLIOGRAPHY Bibliography: Final Recommendations Statement: prostate cancer: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. October 2014. Thomas R Gest , Prostate Anatomy Medscape /1923122 Raychaudhuri and Cahili, Pelvic fasciae in Urology ,RCS annals, Vol :90Issue:8, Nov 2008, pp633-637. Kennth Iczkowski, Prostate carcinoma : core biopsies Pathology Outlines 2003-2016. R H Oyen et al , Benign hyperplastic nodules that originates in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland ,: RSNA Radiology , December 1993, Vol 189, issue 3 . Jelle O. Barentz et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012: Eur(2012)22: 746-757 Jeffrey C. Weinreb et al . PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2 . Eur Urology 69 (2016) 16-40. Jelle O.Barentz wet al. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. European Urology 69 (2016) 41-49. John Kurhanewicz at al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future. Curr. Opin Urol.2008 January ; 18(1): 71-77. Janet NL wt al. Sarcoma of the prostate: a single institutional review. Am J Clin Oncol, 2009 Feb; 32 (1): 27-9 Arda Kayhan et al. Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: Imaging features, detection and staging. World/Radiol 2010 May 28; 2 (5): 180-187 M. Rothkle et al. PI-RADS Classification : Structured Reporting for MRI of the Prostate: Magneton Flash; Issue 4/2013, 30-38 Heminder Sokhi; Anwar R Padhani. Whole Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Bone Marrow Tumor detection. Magneton Flash ; Issue 4/2013,pp6-12 Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Efficacy, Limitations, and Complications—A Systematic Review of the Literature Guillaume Ploussard a,b,c,*, Alberto Briganti d, Alexandre de la Taille c,e, Alexander Haese f, Axel Heidenreich g, Mani Menon h, Tullio Sulser i, Ashutosh K. Tewari j, James A. Eastham k Hashim U Ahmed , et al . Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet Vol:389, February 25, 2017.
  • 181. CHICHESTER , WEST SUSSEX

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. ho