Presentation by Verania Andria, Senior Adviser, UNDP.

1. Bogor | 09.03.2022
Verania Andria
Senior Advisor for Sustainable Energy
Environment Unit
UNDP Indonesia
Sustainable Infrastructure:
Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF)
Kick-off Meeting – Sustainable Infrastructure Programme in Asia (SIPA)

2. 1 National Priority:
Policy, Target, and Stakeholders

3. 1 | National Priority:
Policy, Target, and Stakeholders
DESCRIPTION
Urgency
• The growth of waste generation has made the government of Indonesia put tremendous efforts to
deal with waste problem
• Huge number of wastes that is not properly managed in sustainable ways
• Limited waste management facilities
• Overloaded landfill
RDF is an alternatives
fuel that can be produce
from municipal solid
waste (MSW) used as an
alternative for fossil fuels
Stakeholders and Target
Target 2030: Utilization of waste by converting to energy
through RDF
Utilization of waste by converting to energy through
RDF (in industry) or as renewable energy source in
PLTSa;
The PLTSa/RDF facilities (million ton)
4.6 (mton)
Avoided CO2-eq (million ton) 1.9
(mtCO2eq)
The Ministry of Environment
and Forestry
The Ministry of Energy and
Mineral Resources
Target 2030: Biomass Utilization
Cofiring Program: Biomass
Utilization (million ton)
9 (mton)
*Source: Enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) Republic of Indonesia
MITIGATION
*Source: Enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) Republic of Indonesia MITIGATION

4. 2 Potential
RDF Locations

5. Process Flow from Waste to RDF in Jeruklegi, Cilacap
Inert
Product
Reject
Weigh Bridge
Weighing Truk Unloading
Sorting process
Sorting by waste pickers Shredding
Pre Treatment area
Bay
Drying Process
AF Feeding Facility
Feed to Kiln
Kiln
Delivery RDF
Loading & Delivery RDF
RDF ready to be fed
Waste storage,
600 ton
5
Kapasitas max 20tph atau 400tpd
Product akan ada setiap hari

6. RDF use in Cement Industry:
Operational RDF Facility Jeruk Legi di Cilacap, Central Java
Suhu dalam tanur >1.800°C
Fasilitas Pengolahan Sampah
Jeruklegi RDF Facility
Cilacap city
SBI Cilacap
120-160 ton per day
Fresh waste
5 - 15 ton per hari residu (+/-
15%) – low calorie residue
40 - 60 ton per hari RDF
(+/- 50% )
1 - 3 ton per hari
bahan daur ulang (
>3% )
+/- 35 % water
dehydrated during
drying process
6
Investment cost of RDF
facility (60 t/day RDF) is
USD 5.8 million

7. Biomass for
Cofiring in Coal-
fired Power
Plants

8. 2 | Potential RDF Facility & Off-taker
*Source: Ministry of Environment and Forestsry

9. 2 | Potential RDF Production Sites
Integrated Waste Management Site - TPST
*Source: Directorate of Sanitation, Ministry of Public Works and Housing
Aceh
1.Kota Banda Aceh (TPST RDF)
2.Kab. Aceh Besar (TPST RDF)
West Java
1. Kab. Tasikmalaya (TPA
Nangkaleah Area)
2. Kab. Kuningan (TPST
Cibulan)
3. Kab. Garut (TPST)
4. Kab. Kuningan (TPST)
5. Kab. Ciamis (TPST)
Central Java
1. Kab. Jepara (TPST
Sengonbugel)
2. Kab. Jepara (TPST
Bandengan)
3. Kab. Rembang (TPST)
North Maluku
1. Kpta Tidore kepulauan
(TPST)
West Kalimantan
1. Kab. Sambas
(TPST)
West Nusa Tenggara
1. Kota Mataram
(TPST Sandubaya)
Special Region of
Yogyakarta
1. Kab. Sleman (TPST)
Riau Islands
1. Kab. Lingga
(TPST)
East Java
1. Kab. Lumajang
(TPST Lempeni)
2. Kab. Lumajang
(TPST)
3. Kab. Probolinggo
(TPST)

10. 2 | Potential RDF Off-Taker
Aceh
1.Kota Banda Aceh
West Sumatera
1.Kota Padang
South Sumatera
1. Kab. OKU
2. Kab. OKI
3. Kab. Muara Enim
4. Kab. Musi
Banyuasin
5. Kab. Banyuasin
6. Kab. Lahat
Lampung
1.Kota Bandar
Lampung
Riau
1. Kota Pekanbaru
2. Kab. Pelalawan
3. Kab. Siak
4. Kab. Bengkalis
Banten
1. Kota Cilegon
2. Kab. Pandeglang
3. Kab. Lebak
West Java
1. Kota Bogor
2. Kota Tasikmalaya
3. Kota Cirebon
4. Kab. Majalengka
5. Kab. Purwakarta
6. Kab. Ciamis
7. Kab. Sumedang
Central Java
1. Kab. Semarang
2. Kab. Pati
3. Kab. Kudus
4. Kab. Demak
5. Kab. Boyolali
6. Kab. Karanganyar
7. Kab. Bojonegoro
8. Kab. Klaten
9. Kab. Sragen
East Java
1. Kota Malang
2. Kab. Tulungagung
3. Kab. Blitar
4. Kab. Lumajang
5. Kab. Bondowoso
6. Kab. Probolinggo
7. Kab. Mojokerto
8. Kab. Jombang
9. Kab. Nganjuk
10.Kab. Tuban
Bali
1.Kab. Buleleng
West Kalimantan
1. Kab. Sintang
2. Kota Pontianak
3. Kab. Ketapang
4. Kab. Kapuas
Hulu
Central
Kalimantan
1. Pulang Pisau
East Kalimantan
1. Kota Balikpapan
2. Kota Samarinda
3. Kab. Kutai Kertanegara
4. Kab. Berau
5. Kab. Kutai Timur
6. Kab. Paser
Cement Industry
*Source: Green Fiscal Stimulus Assessment in Waste Sector, UNPAGE Project, 2021
South Kalimantan
1. Kab. Tanah Laut
2. Kab. Tanah Bumbu
3. Kota Banjarmasin

11. 2 | Potential RDF Off-takers
Coal Fired Power Plant – PLTU/PLN
Aceh
1. Kab. Nagan
Raya
West Sumatera
1. Kota Padang
2. Kab.
Sawahlunto
South Sumatera
1. Kab. Muara
Enim
2. Kab. Musi
Banyuasin
Lampung
1. Kab.
Lampung
Selatan
Riau Islands
1. Kota Batam
2. Kab. Karimun
Banten
1. Kota Cilegon
2. Kab.
Pandeglang
3. Kab.
Tangerang
West Java
1. Kab.
Sukabumi
2. Kab.
Indramayu
Central Java
1. Kab.
Rembang
2. Kab. Cilacap
3. Kab. Jepara
East Java
1. Kab. Pacitan
2. Kab. Probolinggo
3. Kab. Tuban
Bali
1. Kab. Buleleng
West Kalimantan
1. Kab. Ketapang
2. Kab. Bengkayang
3. Kab. Sintang
East Kalimantan
1. Kab. Kutai
Kertanegara
2. Kab. Berau
South Kalimantan
1. Kab. Tanah Laut
North Sumatera
1. Kab. Labuhan
Ratu
2. Kab. Lahat
Riau
1. Kota Dumai
2. Kab. Indragiri
Bangka Belitung
1. Kab. Bangka
2. Kab. Belitung
East Nusa Tenggara
1. Kab. Ende
2. Kota Kupang
West Nusa Tenggara
1. Kab. Lombok Barat
2. Kota Bima
Gorontalo
1. Kab. Gorontalo Utara
North Sulawesi
1. Kab. Minahasa Selatan
2. Kep. Talaud
South Sulawesi
1. Kab. Barru
2. Kab. Jenepoto
Central Kalimantan
1. Pulang Pisau
*Source: Green Fiscal Stimulus Assessment in Waste Sector, UNPAGE Project, 2021

12. 3 | Alternative RDF Business Models
Public-Private
Partnership
(PPP)
Non-PPP Scheme
(Government-
driven)
Non-PPP Scheme
(Private-driven)
Government-driven
TOSS Facility
Private sector/
Community-driven
TOSS Facility
1 2 3 4 5

13. 3 | Strengths and Weaknesses
of Alternative Business Models for RDF Project
Model Strength Weakness
1
Public-Private
Partnership
The probability of the project to cancel is low The process is administratively complicated and take
long time.
2
Non-PPP Scheme:
Government
Driven
The administrative procedures are relatively simpler. The risk of uncertainty is relatively high since no
government project guarantee.
3
Non-PPP Scheme:
Private Sector
Driven
1. The administrative procedures are relatively simpler.
2. The national budget could be saved and allocated to other
national priorities
The risk of uncertainty is relatively high since no
government project guarantee.
4
TOSS Facility:
Government
Driven
There are several funding sources that available for finance
the project.
Heavily depend on the local government capacity
5
TOSS Facility:
Private Sector/
Community Driven
The private sector has more flexibility on the designing the
product
1. The private need more time to design until
operation process due to securing financial support
2. Several incentives are needed to mobilize
private/community sector

14. 4 Scope
of Interventions

15. 4 | Scope of Interventions
• UNDP’s activities within SIPA
program will focus on RDF Pilot
Project, especially on strengthening
technical capacity for RDF Planning,
Facility and monitoring
• RDF facility relatively provides more
generous advantages compare to
other waste management facilities.
In terms of environmental benefits, the
RDF facility can reduce waste and
emission massively at once which align
with the government plans to achieve its
NDC target. When it comes to
economics benefits, the RDF facility
could create a massive job creation.
SCOPE OF INTERVENTIONS
Stakeholders Engagement
a. Engagement of local government in potential RDF
sites
b. Engagement RDF off-takers
c. Engagement of investors/financiers
Technical Assistance
Study for RDF Planning Facility
a. RDF Technological Assessment based on off-taker
b. RDF facility FS, DED
Impact Assessment of RDF
Implementation
a. Energy generated, GHGs mitigation
a. Reduced waste

16. 3 Alternative
RDF Business Models

17. THANK YOU