3. CESMA MISSION
• The Center for Aeronautical, Military Studies
“Giulio Douhet” (CESMA) offers a venue to
debate the issues on Security and related use
of Air Power. Its aim is to develop in both
national and international perspective an in-depth
examination and analysis of its
regulatory, operational, doctrinal,
technological and economical aspects.
5. WHY CESMA FOR “CIVILIAN” ISSUE?
CIV-MIL cooperation fundamental
MIL: 10 + years of experience
operating RPAS, to share. Need to fly
in general airspace.
CIV: Burst of interest, national and
international activity, innovation,
resources.
6. CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PANEL
CLEAR AND COMPLETE LEGAL AND
TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK NEEDED
KEY TECHNOLOGIES NOT YET AVAILABLE
R&d SHOULD FOCUS ON THEIR
VALIDATION
7. TECHNOLOGIES MANNED A/C
LINK
GROUND A/C
MISSION
COMMAND
&
CONTROL
-AIRFRAME & SYST.
-SIT. AWARNESS
-S & A
-SECURITY
-NORM & EMERG
PROCEDURES
-HUMAN FACTOR
-AUTOMATION
8. TECHNOLOGIES RPAS
LINK
GROUND A/C
MISSION
COMMAND
&
CONTROL
-SIT. AWARNESS
-S & A
-SECURITY
-NORM & EMERG
PROCEDURES
-HUMAN FACTOR
-AUTOMATION
AIRFRAME & SYST.
9. RPAS
APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES
BALANCING POSSIBLE ENVIROMENT
OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES
COST
GIVEN AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF RISK
11. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
GIVEN THE HIGHLY EVOLUTIONARY NATURE OF THE ENTIRE RPAS MATTER
THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK SHOULD BE FLEXIBLE, ALLOWING
INNOVATION AND EXPERIMENTATION AND HAVING PROVISION TO RAPIDLY
INCORPORATE THE RESULTS OF SUCH ACTIVITY
IT SHOULD ALLOW BOTH APPROACHES:
- FROM SCENARIO AND OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS TO CERTIFICATION
STANDARDS (PRODUCTION)
- FROM DESIGN TO OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS AND PERMISSIBLE
SCENARIO (EXPERIMENTATION)
12. RISK
THE RISK HAS TO BE DEFINED AND
THE CONTRIBUTION OF ALL
RELEVANT COMPONENTS MEASURED
THIS WILL DEFINE APPLICABLE RULES
WITH RISK-REDUCTION MEASURE IF
NEEDED