Are you tired of boring meetings which go on and on and never quite get to the point?
Are you fed up with the same old people speaking up all the time?
Would you like to harness the creativity and intelligence of everyone in the room, whilst having more fun?
If so, Liberating Structures are for you. They are simple rules for groups, designed to include everyone in shaping the future.
They’ve been developed and field tested over the past 10+ years in a variety of settings including healthcare, education, business and government. Based on pioneering work to apply complexity science in business and organisational settings.
David and Iwona will offer an interactive ‘taster’ experience of some of the key Liberating Structures of the repertoire. You’ll get an idea of the range and power of the repertoire and how you apply them to your own work as a scrum master or agile coach.
David Heath (https://twitter.com/dgheath21) is a Lead Developer at the UK Government Digital Service and also runs the London Liberating Structures Meetup.
Iwona Winiarska is an Agile Delivery Manager at the UK Government Digital Service and coorganises agile meetups and conferences in London.
5. You gain from
control
• Calm things down to
promote predictability
You gain from
disorder
• Stir things up to promote
anti-fragility & creative
adaptability
20. Who seems more serious and
more playful?
Henri Lipmanowicz Keith
McCandless
LIBERATING STRUCTURES CO-DEVELOPERS
21. Made available through a Creative Commons
Non-Commercial, Attribution, Share-and-Share Alike
License
You can use ‘em, you can share ‘em,
but you can’t sell ‘em
Slide content adapted from materials developed by Keith McCandless
Most photographs by Keith McCandless, others as noted
36. What is your challenge?
What kind of help do you need?
37. Get into groups of 3
Everyone thinks of a challenge they’d like help
with [1 minute]
38. In turn each person plays the client while the
others act as consultants, so three times:
1. Client explains problem [1 min]
2. Clarifying questions [2 mins]
3. Client turns their back around and listens
4. Consultants discuss problem [4 mins]
5. Client turns around and debriefs [1 min]
39. What, So What,
Now What
Together, Look Back on Progress to Date
and Decide What Adjustments Are Needed
20 min
40. Observable data and experiences
Actions I take based on beliefs
Beliefs I adopt about the world
Conclusions I draw from assumptions
Assumptions I make based on meanings
Meanings I add (cultural & personal)
Data I select from observations1. What?
2. So
What?
3. Now
What?
Ladder of Inference
Emphasizes the value of a step-by-step progression in debriefing or after-action conversations. The value
of staying LOW on the ladder is visually reinforced. Misunderstandings and arguments can be avoided.
42. Look back on the past two exercises
1. What happened?
2. What did you see? hear? notice?
3. What feelings or sensations did you have?
4. What facts or observations stood out?
In silence for a minute on your
own, write your answers
1 minute
43. Share your ‘whats’ in your
group
Help each other to stay on the level
of facts and observations
Point out if you or others are jumping
ahead to conclusion, meaning or
actions
4 minute
45. So what?
1. Why is that important?
2. What patterns or conclusions are emerging?
3. What hypotheses can you make?
In silence for a minute on your own,
write your answers
1 minute
46. So what?
Share in your group
Help each other to stay on the ‘so what’ level,
and avoid jumping to actions
3 minute
48. Now what?
Thinking about your own work
What lessons you can draw from tonight?
What will you do differently?
Could you use one of these structures?
➢ Write down one or two ideas
➢ Identify a first action step for each
2 minute