3. Agenda
40 minutes
Knowledge Graphs vs THE Knowledge Graph
Why Topics aka Entities are replacing keywords in
search
How you can see how well Google understands
Entities in your content
How you can IMPROVE Google’s understanding of
the entities
22. A4:
Words vary
between
languages.
Topics don’t. Idea 1
Idea 2
Translate to 100+ Languages on fly
Translate to 100+ Languages on fly
100 pages in
separate
languages
Hard to disambiguate & cross
reference
29. What
have we
found
so far?
• A Knowledge Graph helps create a
machine readable single point of
truth.
• Google Trends is an easy way to see
topics Google understands
• Understanding Entities (Topics) is a
pressing issue for Information
Retrieval.
• Anatomy of a Wikipedia Article shows
they link a lot
• Links out of a page all carry different
weights
30. WARNING!
• Wikipedia’s internal outlinks are based on
Entities. Do not link internally based on
Keywords.
This is a hard concept to
get one’s head around.
Even harder to manage
on large websites.
But Fear not…
31. So… What
does this
mean for
us as SEOs?
First we’ll need algorithms to convert text to Entities / Topics
45. What have
we found in
Part 2
• Semantic SEO communicates topic
details to (and from) the Knowledge
Graph
• Wikipedia suffers heavily from Human
Bias, so Google’s KG does too
• Tightly themed, content rich sites are
easier to build Knowledge Graphs for
• Google have a NLP checking tool
• Scaling internal links is something
Wikipedia does well… you should too!
46. Tips and
Takeaways
• Build your site as if it was a miniature
Knowledge Graph
• Build content pages around the
Knowledge graph created by the top
pages for a given phrase
• Create “Topic” landing pages (with
Webpage schema)
• Internally link ideas (not keywords) to
those landing pages
47.
48. K n o w y o u r K n o w l e d g e G r a p h s
Dixon Jones
Email “Talk@DixonJones.com with “SEO
Mastery in the title”
Notes de l'éditeur
Well worth looking at the anatomy of a Wikipedia page.
Company opposite my desk have a Virtual Reality page.