This document discusses the shapes of brand conversations on social media. It analyzes conversation maps of different brands on Twitter and finds that they exist on a continuum from centralized to decentralized. Centralized maps resemble a hub-and-spoke structure with one central account, while decentralized maps have an ecosystem of many interconnected accounts. The ideal structure depends on communication goals - centralized messaging maintains brand associations but decentralized ecosystems foster more engagement. Strategies for cultivating decentralized conversations include tapping enthusiast communities, using influencers and hashtags, and spurring two-way discussions rather than one-way sharing.
2024's Top PPC Tactics: Triple Your Google Ads Local Leads
The shape of brand conversations
1. 1
The shape of brand
conversations
Kyle Findlay
Head of Data Science & Knowledge Creation
The TNS Global Brand Equity Centre
Winner of the Best Methodological Paper
award at the 2015 ESOMAR Congress
conference in Dublin, Ireland
6. 6Source: Mayweather vs. Pacquiao fight (Q1 2015)
Sport Center’s account during the Mayweather-Pacquiao is an example of
a hub-and-spoke ‘shape’
7. 7Source: Mayweather vs. Pacquiao fight (Q1 2015)
Shallow calls to actions like these lead to sharing but not two-way
conversation:
8. 8Source: Ford North America footprint (May-June 2015)
The following two week slice of converations around the Ford brand give
us a good example of a decentralised brand ecosystem
9. 9Source: Ford North America footprint (June 2015)
Ford has an organic ecosystem around its brand made up of multiple
distinct constituencies
13. 13
Bud’s “Lost Puppy” ad from Superbowl 2015 received the most retweets
out of all the 70+ Superbowl ads
14. 14
It is a great example of a centralised, hub-and-spoke shape…
15. 15Source: Super Bowl (Feb 2015)
But if we look at it’s shape, it’s very centralised with little organic
conversation around it
NOTE: If Bud’s goal was to simply
update existing associations with
the brand (i.e. a “maintenance
strategy”), it likely succeeded. If
the goal was to draw in new users
and/or change perceptions, it
probably could have done more.
16. 16Source: Super Bowl (Feb 2015)
The ad was very emotive and thus was widely shared but it lacked
relevance to beer and so did not encourage much organic conversation
17. 17Source: Oscars (Q1 2015)
+ =
Lego partnered with artists, Nathan Sawayan, to present Oscar winners
with trophies made out of Lego
18. 18Source: Oscars (Q1 2015)
The resulting conversation map was very de-centralised, likely due to the
campaign’s good mix of novelty, emotion and relevance
20. 20
Hub-and-spoke Spin-off Ecosystem
Centralised De-centralised
Conversation maps sit on a continuum: as the conversation becomes
more organic, we move from a centralised broadcasting shape to a more
decentralised ecosystem of conversations
21. 21
It’s a balance
Centralised messaging
controls the conversation BUT
also tends to be a bit boring.
One-directional broadcasting
might help update
brand associations
Can engaged conversations
more strongly
affect perceptions?
De-centralised creates
sustained engagement
…BUT too de-centralised
makes it difficult to lead
conversation
Centralised De-centralised
Different shapes play different roles…
23. 23
Strategically @mention
influencers & spokespeople to
access their communities
Strategic use of hashtags to
bind/extend conversations
But, most importantly…
[next slide]
@
#
How does one tap into multiple constituencies?
25. 25
Start real
conversations
Any model of virality will tell
you that emotion/valence/
affective stimuli gets
shared….
+
…EBUT emotional + relevant
content gets shared and talked
about organically!