SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  7
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Biopiracy: A Trespass Against Indigenous Lives
Indigenous and local communities withhold a great deal of treasured knowledge due to their
close and ancestral affinity with nature, which is susceptible to misappropriation as it has
immense potential of adducing commercial profits and benefits. As a part of this knowledge are
reserves dealing with biochemicals, their nature, properties, and multifarious uses, which have
the potential of adding value to the quality of normal life. The threat of biopiracy in the face of
multinational companies, specifically pharmaceutical entities, brings forth the question of
guarding these treasures against illegitimate exploitation.
What is Biopiracy?
Biopiracy is the practice of commercial exploitation of indigenous knowledge regarding the
beneficial use of plants and animals, including the biochemicals or genetic materials contained
there within that occur naturally. A major deal of knowledge and information about such genetic
materials held by ingenious communities is vital for their survival and has been a result of the
continuous transgression of such details over several generations. These usually relate to the
following:
 Farming techniques or agricultural methods
 Medicinal plants and their utility
 Varieties of food crops
Biopiracy can usually take any of the three forms that are mentioned below:
 Bio-prospecting: This involves the discovery of new plants and animals with beneficial
uses;
 It may be realized in the form of discovery of unknown benefits arising out of a known
plant; and
 It may also be observed to occur in the form of the most abusive kind, which is the
commercial exploitation of indigenous knowledge.
A Few Examples of Biopiracy
 Patenting of Neem is an iconic example. Neem, which is scientifically known as Azadirachta
Indica, has been in use for centuries in India and forms a part of collective knowledge held
amongst the Indian populace. However, in 1994, W.R. Grace received a European Patent,
which entailed various methods that could be put to use for controlling fungal infections in
plants by utilizing a composition that is extracted from the neem tree.
 The patenting of the variation of the Yellow Bean, known as the Enola Bean, is also often
cited. It was patented in 1999 by Larry Proctor. He sued several other importers who
commercialized the sale of Mexican Yellow Beans on account of his patent, as a result of
which several farmers faced a crisis. The case was brought up to the US Patent and
Trademarks Office (USPTO), which ruled against the patent holder and in favor of the
farmers to preserve the traditional knowledge behind the subject matter.
 As a part of shared knowledge from the indigenous community, a plant known as
Pentadiplandra Brazzein, which is found in South Africa, is a vital source of protein and is
often used as a substitute for sugar because it is two thousand times sweeter than sugar.
Recently, the same has been developed for commercial use by isolating the gene encoding
the brazzein, which has been sequenced and patented in the USA.
 Yoga has also flourished amongst different traditions. The US-based NRI, Bikram
Choudhary, applied for copyright and Patent Protection over his methods of teaching yoga.
The USPTO has granted 150 yoga-related copyright, 134 trademarks on yoga accessories,
and 2,315 yoga related-trademarks, even though India continuously opposed such grants.
Nature of Conflicts
Although biodiversity is sought to be protected under the umbrella of Intellectual Property
Rights (IPRs), it may conflict with most IPRs, such as that under the Patent Law. The reason
for the same is that biodiversity is a social and cultural aspect, and the resources and associated
knowledge are governed as a part of the common property systems. IPRs, on the contrary, see
such virtues from an economic point of view to create commercially viable objects in favor of
private monopolization.
The said issue is also governed under international agreements to a certain extent. The
Convention on Biological Diversity places a restriction enabling exclusions of knowledge,
innovations, and ideas possessed by the 'intellectual commons,' i.e., the local communities,
which belong to the diverse biological resources from the category of common rights.
In addition to the same issue is the wide divide between the haves and the have-nots. The world's
richest bio-reserves can be found in the tropical and sub-tropical regions within developing
countries like Mexico, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Congo, etc. This divide is further widened when
bioresource-rich countries are overstepped upon by technology-rich countries. The examples of
such misappropriation are routed in the colonial history of most of the developing and under-
developed nations for commercializing different varieties of pepper, sugar, coffee, quinine, to
name a few. As a result of this, the WTO member states have been asked to develop and enforce
legal frameworks to protect plant and animal resources as a part of two systems: one for
agricultural contexts and the other for pharmaceutical, chemical, textile, or other commodity
contexts, which have been incorporated by some of them. Also, many countries have enacted
legislation in furtherance of the Convention on Biological Diversity to protect their bioresources
and the cultural heritage of the traditional and indigenous communities. The following provisions
address the concerns of traditional knowledge and biopiracy:
 Article 3: It recognizes the sovereign right of each member state to exploit their
resources in accordance with their own environmental policies.
 Article 8(j): It provides for the conservation of traditional knowledge and practices of
indigenous communities with respect to their genetic resources.
 Article 15: It recognizes the national rights of sovereignty over genetic resources,
thereby making access to these resources subject to national legislation. It also provides
that access and commercial use of genetic resources would be based on mutually agreed
conditions regarding equitable sharing of benefits and with prior consent.
The reason behind such legislative shift and demand to introduce legislation to balance both
kinds of interest is that patents were the first mode of protecting and stimulating inventions. In
the face of such developments, many anti-biopiracy activists and academicians have pushed for
change within the system. However, not much has changed ever since, and the issue of biopiracy
has remained a stalemate.
Reasons Against Biopiracy
(i) Moral Rights: The moral rights are recognized under the Berne Convention for the
Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, which is a strong justification to protect
indigenous communities against biopiracy since it directly interferes with their right to
develop their heritage and control their knowledge. Often, patent holders do not acknowledge
the community from which they borrow their knowledge contributing to the creation of their
monopolistic right. It prevents them from deciding who and how their knowledge is
leveraged.
(ii) Cultural Rights: As observed, there is a clear conflict between the western and developing
countries. Biopiracy is a cultural misappropriation of the information held by the local
communities as patenting results in the commodification of this knowledge, which is against
the cultural facet of knowledge. It also disturbs the sacred emotion of these communities as
their knowledge is nothing less than religion to them. To trade knowledge for money may be
seen as a disrespectful act against the communities' religious and cultural sentiments. It goes
against the moral and material interests as has also been safeguarded and recognized under
Article 27 of the Declaration of Human Rights and Article 15 of the International Covenant
on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.
These arguments have resulted in a few instances of success against biopiracy, which are
mentioned below:
 Unilever (Netherlands) had withdrawn their application EP1607006 for 'Functional berry
composition' dated 04 August 2009 after submission of TKDL prior art evidence(s).
 Nestec S.A. Avenue Nestlé 55 1800 Vevey, Switzerland had withdrawn their application
number EP2263481 for 'Green tea extracts of improved bioavailability.'
 Industrial Research Limited and Otago Innovation Limited in New Zealand had
withdrawn their application number EP 1750809 for 'Citrus Fruit Skin extract for
Angiogenesis promotion' based on the TKDL evidence.
Reasons in Favour of Biopiracy
(i) No Harm Caused to Indigenous Communities: The argument in favor of biopiracy is
usually titled towards the argument that patenting inventions based on traditional knowledge
do not cause any harm or interference with the rights of the indigenous community. The same
was also used to defend the Neem case where a compound extracted from Neem, which
protected its 'formulated products and synthetic derivatives,' was said not to affect the rights
of the community already using Neem in its natural form.
(ii) No Basis of Granting Exclusivity to Indigenous Communities: It is argued that such
absolute protection cannot be granted to existing traditional knowledge about plant genetic
resources. IPRs are created to generate incentives and interests to promote innovation. The
protection of traditional knowledge does not qualify this facet of IPRs; therefore, it fails to
justify the essence of this property right.
Conclusions and Suggestions
Biopiracy is a matter of hot debate and a harsh reality. As observed above, the significance of
traditional knowledge for indigenous communities surpasses their need to commercialize such
knowledge, and therefore, adverse privatization is derogatory to the interests of these
communities. The idea of benefit-sharing should be generously adopted in the event of granting
exclusive rights over such commodities and information to maintain a fine balance of interests
while also benefiting the public at large. For realizing better outcomes in favor of this fine
balance, the provisions within the Trade-Related Aspect on Intellectual Property Rights
(TRIPS) Agreement and CBD should be harmonized to introduce amendments within the
TRIPS. India has also been vehemently suggesting that TRIPS should incorporate that where
patents founded based on traditional knowledge are sought, there should be an attached proof
that the prior consent of the community and the concerned member state has been acquired.
Furthermore, there should be a creation of 'Digital Libraries' to collect and project the details
concerning genetic information. It will help in protecting traditional knowledge of indigenous
communities as it will act as a public notice to the public and multi-national companies against
superseding and not accounting for prior art found in the literature based on traditional
knowledge.
Lastly, a stronger framework should be endorsed to protect and preserve in the interest of the
local and indigenous communities with respect to the information and practices concerning
biodiversity. A leading example of this is the Philippines enacting the Indigenous Peoples Rights
Act, 1997, which grants indigenous communities control and rights over their traditional
knowledge and genetic resources.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Environmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorism
Environmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorismEnvironmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorism
Environmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorismgohil sanjay bhagvanji
 
Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...
Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...
Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...Abhishek Singh
 
Genetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental Justice
Genetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental JusticeGenetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental Justice
Genetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental JusticeBrendan Coolsaet
 
Protection of Traditional Knowledge
Protection of Traditional KnowledgeProtection of Traditional Knowledge
Protection of Traditional Knowledgepatent_unitedipr
 
Negative impact of ipr on biodiversity
Negative impact of ipr on biodiversityNegative impact of ipr on biodiversity
Negative impact of ipr on biodiversitySwaraj Prasad
 
The Role of IPR in the protection of Biodiversity
The Role of IPR in the protection of  Biodiversity The Role of IPR in the protection of  Biodiversity
The Role of IPR in the protection of Biodiversity Vishal C
 
Genetic resources and ipr
Genetic resources and iprGenetic resources and ipr
Genetic resources and ipr20107-07
 
Impact of ipr on biodiversity
Impact of ipr on biodiversityImpact of ipr on biodiversity
Impact of ipr on biodiversityAltacit Global
 
Unit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldi
Unit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldiUnit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldi
Unit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldiAnuradha Singh
 
Presentation mani ipr
Presentation  mani iprPresentation  mani ipr
Presentation mani iprAbhinav yadav
 
Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2
Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2
Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2IAEME Publication
 
Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical Indications
Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical IndicationsProtection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical Indications
Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical Indicationsachintyanath
 
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGYINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGYNamitha M R
 
Treaty governance
Treaty governanceTreaty governance
Treaty governanceKANDAYATHA
 
IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...
IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...
IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...Saravanan A
 
plant breeder"s rights
plant breeder"s rightsplant breeder"s rights
plant breeder"s rightsMuhammad Anas
 

Tendances (20)

biopiracy
biopiracybiopiracy
biopiracy
 
Environmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorism
Environmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorismEnvironmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorism
Environmental problems biopiracy & eco terrorism
 
Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...
Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...
Intellectual property rights(I.P.R.) and traditional knowledge protection of ...
 
Genetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental Justice
Genetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental JusticeGenetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental Justice
Genetic resources, Intellectual Property Rights and Environmental Justice
 
Protection of Traditional Knowledge
Protection of Traditional KnowledgeProtection of Traditional Knowledge
Protection of Traditional Knowledge
 
Negative impact of ipr on biodiversity
Negative impact of ipr on biodiversityNegative impact of ipr on biodiversity
Negative impact of ipr on biodiversity
 
Biopiracy
BiopiracyBiopiracy
Biopiracy
 
Brinjal biopiracy
Brinjal biopiracyBrinjal biopiracy
Brinjal biopiracy
 
10 traditional knowledge
10 traditional knowledge10 traditional knowledge
10 traditional knowledge
 
The Role of IPR in the protection of Biodiversity
The Role of IPR in the protection of  Biodiversity The Role of IPR in the protection of  Biodiversity
The Role of IPR in the protection of Biodiversity
 
Genetic resources and ipr
Genetic resources and iprGenetic resources and ipr
Genetic resources and ipr
 
Impact of ipr on biodiversity
Impact of ipr on biodiversityImpact of ipr on biodiversity
Impact of ipr on biodiversity
 
Unit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldi
Unit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldiUnit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldi
Unit 4 definitions patent, ipr,fr,br,biopiracy & neem haldi
 
Presentation mani ipr
Presentation  mani iprPresentation  mani ipr
Presentation mani ipr
 
Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2
Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2
Problems and concerns of farmers rights under ipr 2
 
Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical Indications
Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical IndicationsProtection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical Indications
Protection Of Traditional Knowledge As Geographical Indications
 
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGYINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
 
Treaty governance
Treaty governanceTreaty governance
Treaty governance
 
IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...
IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...
IPR in Traditional Knowledge and Bio –Diversity: Protection, Issues and Possi...
 
plant breeder"s rights
plant breeder"s rightsplant breeder"s rights
plant breeder"s rights
 

Similaire à Biopiracy a trespass against indigenous lives

A TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTS
A TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTSA TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTS
A TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTSDr.M.Geethavani
 
The Law of the Seed
The Law of the SeedThe Law of the Seed
The Law of the SeedSeeds
 
Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products
Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products
Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products Shagufta Farooqui
 
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10Altacit Global
 
TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR
TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR
TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR Sarvan Mani
 
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10Altacit Global
 
unit II ppt updated.pptx
unit II ppt updated.pptxunit II ppt updated.pptx
unit II ppt updated.pptxJeeva Nantham
 
Patentability Of Microorganisms
Patentability Of MicroorganismsPatentability Of Microorganisms
Patentability Of MicroorganismsShradha Diwan
 
Biotechnology project
Biotechnology project Biotechnology project
Biotechnology project ArhamReza1
 
Traditional knowledge changing scenario in india
Traditional knowledge changing scenario in indiaTraditional knowledge changing scenario in india
Traditional knowledge changing scenario in indiaManjappa Ganiger
 
IPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTS
IPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTSIPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTS
IPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTSujjwal sirohi
 
Challenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptx
Challenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptxChallenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptx
Challenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptxSarojMahanta8
 
BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTION
BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTIONBIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTION
BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTIONChiragZala6
 
RECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
RECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGERECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
RECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGEDhruv Tripathi
 
Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...
Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...
Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...Dhruv Tripathi
 
traditionalknowledge ppt for science and
traditionalknowledge ppt for science andtraditionalknowledge ppt for science and
traditionalknowledge ppt for science andmrfshanker80
 

Similaire à Biopiracy a trespass against indigenous lives (20)

A TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTS
A TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTSA TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTS
A TEXTBOOK OF INTELLECTUAL ROPERTY RIGHTS
 
The Law of the Seed
The Law of the SeedThe Law of the Seed
The Law of the Seed
 
Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products
Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products
Patenting and regulatory requirements of natural products
 
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
 
Govt Degree College piler BIO PIRACY.pptx
Govt Degree College piler BIO PIRACY.pptxGovt Degree College piler BIO PIRACY.pptx
Govt Degree College piler BIO PIRACY.pptx
 
TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR
TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR
TRADITIONAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE IPR
 
dib.pptx
dib.pptxdib.pptx
dib.pptx
 
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
Bioiversity act 2002 5.3.10
 
unit II ppt updated.pptx
unit II ppt updated.pptxunit II ppt updated.pptx
unit II ppt updated.pptx
 
Patentability Of Microorganisms
Patentability Of MicroorganismsPatentability Of Microorganisms
Patentability Of Microorganisms
 
Biotechnology project
Biotechnology project Biotechnology project
Biotechnology project
 
Traditional knowledge changing scenario in india
Traditional knowledge changing scenario in indiaTraditional knowledge changing scenario in india
Traditional knowledge changing scenario in india
 
IPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTS
IPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTSIPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTS
IPR in AGRICULTURE PLANT BREEDER'S FARMER'S RIGHTS
 
Agrobiodiversity, farmers´rights and agroforestry
Agrobiodiversity, farmers´rights and agroforestryAgrobiodiversity, farmers´rights and agroforestry
Agrobiodiversity, farmers´rights and agroforestry
 
Challenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptx
Challenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptxChallenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptx
Challenges of protecting Ipr-2.pptx
 
BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTION
BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTIONBIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTION
BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS – STATUS OF PROTECTION
 
RECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
RECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGERECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
RECOGNITION TO THE WISDOM- PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
 
Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...
Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...
Overview on legal provisions on copyrights and patents of medicinal plants in...
 
10 sui generis system
10 sui generis system10 sui generis system
10 sui generis system
 
traditionalknowledge ppt for science and
traditionalknowledge ppt for science andtraditionalknowledge ppt for science and
traditionalknowledge ppt for science and
 

Plus de kashishworld

Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventions
Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of InventionsPatent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventions
Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventionskashishworld
 
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdf
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdfVoiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdf
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdfkashishworld
 
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?kashishworld
 
Copyright in Compilations
Copyright in CompilationsCopyright in Compilations
Copyright in Compilationskashishworld
 
Arbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of Action
Arbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of ActionArbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of Action
Arbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of Actionkashishworld
 
What are Neighboring Rights?
What are Neighboring Rights?What are Neighboring Rights?
What are Neighboring Rights?kashishworld
 
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runway
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the RunwaySafeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runway
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runwaykashishworld
 
Making Way for Gesture Trademarks
Making Way for Gesture TrademarksMaking Way for Gesture Trademarks
Making Way for Gesture Trademarkskashishworld
 
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRs
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRsBrain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRs
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRskashishworld
 
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021kashishworld
 
Linking trademarks and character merchandising
Linking trademarks and character merchandisingLinking trademarks and character merchandising
Linking trademarks and character merchandisingkashishworld
 
IP Flavors - 5th Edition
IP Flavors - 5th EditionIP Flavors - 5th Edition
IP Flavors - 5th Editionkashishworld
 
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continent
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-ContinentIP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continent
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continentkashishworld
 
IP Flavors - 3rd Edition
IP Flavors - 3rd EditionIP Flavors - 3rd Edition
IP Flavors - 3rd Editionkashishworld
 
IP Flavors - 4th Edition | Newsletter
IP Flavors - 4th Edition | NewsletterIP Flavors - 4th Edition | Newsletter
IP Flavors - 4th Edition | Newsletterkashishworld
 
Intellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa Region
Intellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa RegionIntellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa Region
Intellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa Regionkashishworld
 
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island Nations
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island NationsTrademark Registration- Pacific Island Nations
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island Nationskashishworld
 
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritius
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritiusThe industrial property_act_2019_mauritius
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritiuskashishworld
 

Plus de kashishworld (18)

Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventions
Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of InventionsPatent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventions
Patent Thickets: An Intertwining Web of Inventions
 
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdf
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdfVoiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdf
Voiceover artists play a significant role in hitting the box.pdf
 
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?
The Intellectual Property Right Induced Conundrum: To Repair or Not?
 
Copyright in Compilations
Copyright in CompilationsCopyright in Compilations
Copyright in Compilations
 
Arbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of Action
Arbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of ActionArbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of Action
Arbitration or Litigation: Choosing the Appropriate Course of Action
 
What are Neighboring Rights?
What are Neighboring Rights?What are Neighboring Rights?
What are Neighboring Rights?
 
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runway
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the RunwaySafeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runway
Safeguarding Fashion Shows: Copyright Laws on the Runway
 
Making Way for Gesture Trademarks
Making Way for Gesture TrademarksMaking Way for Gesture Trademarks
Making Way for Gesture Trademarks
 
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRs
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRsBrain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRs
Brain Interfacing Systems & the Interplay of IPRs
 
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
Previous judgments walking down the lane to 2021
 
Linking trademarks and character merchandising
Linking trademarks and character merchandisingLinking trademarks and character merchandising
Linking trademarks and character merchandising
 
IP Flavors - 5th Edition
IP Flavors - 5th EditionIP Flavors - 5th Edition
IP Flavors - 5th Edition
 
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continent
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-ContinentIP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continent
IP Flavors 2nd Edition - IP Protection & Enforcement in the Indian Sub-Continent
 
IP Flavors - 3rd Edition
IP Flavors - 3rd EditionIP Flavors - 3rd Edition
IP Flavors - 3rd Edition
 
IP Flavors - 4th Edition | Newsletter
IP Flavors - 4th Edition | NewsletterIP Flavors - 4th Edition | Newsletter
IP Flavors - 4th Edition | Newsletter
 
Intellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa Region
Intellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa RegionIntellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa Region
Intellectual Property Rights in Africa | IP Rights in Africa Region
 
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island Nations
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island NationsTrademark Registration- Pacific Island Nations
Trademark Registration- Pacific Island Nations
 
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritius
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritiusThe industrial property_act_2019_mauritius
The industrial property_act_2019_mauritius
 

Dernier

An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha PanditAn introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha PanditSHRADDHA PANDIT
 
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.mike689707
 
Classification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business RegulationsClassification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business RegulationsSyedaAyeshaTabassum1
 
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...Anadi Tewari
 
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...SHRADDHA PANDIT
 
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdfIslamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdfNo One
 
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a TemplateThe Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a TemplateBTL Law P.C.
 
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future SolutionsPatents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future SolutionsAurora Consulting
 

Dernier (10)

An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha PanditAn introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
 
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
 
Criminalizing Disabilities & False Confessions
Criminalizing Disabilities & False ConfessionsCriminalizing Disabilities & False Confessions
Criminalizing Disabilities & False Confessions
 
Classification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business RegulationsClassification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business Regulations
 
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
 
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
 
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdfIslamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
 
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
 
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a TemplateThe Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
 
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future SolutionsPatents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
 

Biopiracy a trespass against indigenous lives

  • 1. Biopiracy: A Trespass Against Indigenous Lives Indigenous and local communities withhold a great deal of treasured knowledge due to their close and ancestral affinity with nature, which is susceptible to misappropriation as it has immense potential of adducing commercial profits and benefits. As a part of this knowledge are reserves dealing with biochemicals, their nature, properties, and multifarious uses, which have the potential of adding value to the quality of normal life. The threat of biopiracy in the face of multinational companies, specifically pharmaceutical entities, brings forth the question of guarding these treasures against illegitimate exploitation. What is Biopiracy? Biopiracy is the practice of commercial exploitation of indigenous knowledge regarding the beneficial use of plants and animals, including the biochemicals or genetic materials contained there within that occur naturally. A major deal of knowledge and information about such genetic materials held by ingenious communities is vital for their survival and has been a result of the continuous transgression of such details over several generations. These usually relate to the following:  Farming techniques or agricultural methods  Medicinal plants and their utility
  • 2.  Varieties of food crops Biopiracy can usually take any of the three forms that are mentioned below:  Bio-prospecting: This involves the discovery of new plants and animals with beneficial uses;  It may be realized in the form of discovery of unknown benefits arising out of a known plant; and  It may also be observed to occur in the form of the most abusive kind, which is the commercial exploitation of indigenous knowledge. A Few Examples of Biopiracy  Patenting of Neem is an iconic example. Neem, which is scientifically known as Azadirachta Indica, has been in use for centuries in India and forms a part of collective knowledge held amongst the Indian populace. However, in 1994, W.R. Grace received a European Patent, which entailed various methods that could be put to use for controlling fungal infections in plants by utilizing a composition that is extracted from the neem tree.  The patenting of the variation of the Yellow Bean, known as the Enola Bean, is also often cited. It was patented in 1999 by Larry Proctor. He sued several other importers who commercialized the sale of Mexican Yellow Beans on account of his patent, as a result of
  • 3. which several farmers faced a crisis. The case was brought up to the US Patent and Trademarks Office (USPTO), which ruled against the patent holder and in favor of the farmers to preserve the traditional knowledge behind the subject matter.  As a part of shared knowledge from the indigenous community, a plant known as Pentadiplandra Brazzein, which is found in South Africa, is a vital source of protein and is often used as a substitute for sugar because it is two thousand times sweeter than sugar. Recently, the same has been developed for commercial use by isolating the gene encoding the brazzein, which has been sequenced and patented in the USA.  Yoga has also flourished amongst different traditions. The US-based NRI, Bikram Choudhary, applied for copyright and Patent Protection over his methods of teaching yoga. The USPTO has granted 150 yoga-related copyright, 134 trademarks on yoga accessories, and 2,315 yoga related-trademarks, even though India continuously opposed such grants. Nature of Conflicts Although biodiversity is sought to be protected under the umbrella of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), it may conflict with most IPRs, such as that under the Patent Law. The reason for the same is that biodiversity is a social and cultural aspect, and the resources and associated knowledge are governed as a part of the common property systems. IPRs, on the contrary, see such virtues from an economic point of view to create commercially viable objects in favor of private monopolization. The said issue is also governed under international agreements to a certain extent. The Convention on Biological Diversity places a restriction enabling exclusions of knowledge, innovations, and ideas possessed by the 'intellectual commons,' i.e., the local communities, which belong to the diverse biological resources from the category of common rights. In addition to the same issue is the wide divide between the haves and the have-nots. The world's richest bio-reserves can be found in the tropical and sub-tropical regions within developing countries like Mexico, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Congo, etc. This divide is further widened when bioresource-rich countries are overstepped upon by technology-rich countries. The examples of such misappropriation are routed in the colonial history of most of the developing and under- developed nations for commercializing different varieties of pepper, sugar, coffee, quinine, to name a few. As a result of this, the WTO member states have been asked to develop and enforce
  • 4. legal frameworks to protect plant and animal resources as a part of two systems: one for agricultural contexts and the other for pharmaceutical, chemical, textile, or other commodity contexts, which have been incorporated by some of them. Also, many countries have enacted legislation in furtherance of the Convention on Biological Diversity to protect their bioresources and the cultural heritage of the traditional and indigenous communities. The following provisions address the concerns of traditional knowledge and biopiracy:  Article 3: It recognizes the sovereign right of each member state to exploit their resources in accordance with their own environmental policies.  Article 8(j): It provides for the conservation of traditional knowledge and practices of indigenous communities with respect to their genetic resources.  Article 15: It recognizes the national rights of sovereignty over genetic resources, thereby making access to these resources subject to national legislation. It also provides that access and commercial use of genetic resources would be based on mutually agreed conditions regarding equitable sharing of benefits and with prior consent. The reason behind such legislative shift and demand to introduce legislation to balance both kinds of interest is that patents were the first mode of protecting and stimulating inventions. In the face of such developments, many anti-biopiracy activists and academicians have pushed for change within the system. However, not much has changed ever since, and the issue of biopiracy has remained a stalemate. Reasons Against Biopiracy (i) Moral Rights: The moral rights are recognized under the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, which is a strong justification to protect
  • 5. indigenous communities against biopiracy since it directly interferes with their right to develop their heritage and control their knowledge. Often, patent holders do not acknowledge the community from which they borrow their knowledge contributing to the creation of their monopolistic right. It prevents them from deciding who and how their knowledge is leveraged. (ii) Cultural Rights: As observed, there is a clear conflict between the western and developing countries. Biopiracy is a cultural misappropriation of the information held by the local communities as patenting results in the commodification of this knowledge, which is against the cultural facet of knowledge. It also disturbs the sacred emotion of these communities as their knowledge is nothing less than religion to them. To trade knowledge for money may be seen as a disrespectful act against the communities' religious and cultural sentiments. It goes against the moral and material interests as has also been safeguarded and recognized under Article 27 of the Declaration of Human Rights and Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. These arguments have resulted in a few instances of success against biopiracy, which are mentioned below:  Unilever (Netherlands) had withdrawn their application EP1607006 for 'Functional berry composition' dated 04 August 2009 after submission of TKDL prior art evidence(s).  Nestec S.A. Avenue Nestlé 55 1800 Vevey, Switzerland had withdrawn their application number EP2263481 for 'Green tea extracts of improved bioavailability.'  Industrial Research Limited and Otago Innovation Limited in New Zealand had withdrawn their application number EP 1750809 for 'Citrus Fruit Skin extract for Angiogenesis promotion' based on the TKDL evidence. Reasons in Favour of Biopiracy (i) No Harm Caused to Indigenous Communities: The argument in favor of biopiracy is usually titled towards the argument that patenting inventions based on traditional knowledge do not cause any harm or interference with the rights of the indigenous community. The same was also used to defend the Neem case where a compound extracted from Neem, which
  • 6. protected its 'formulated products and synthetic derivatives,' was said not to affect the rights of the community already using Neem in its natural form. (ii) No Basis of Granting Exclusivity to Indigenous Communities: It is argued that such absolute protection cannot be granted to existing traditional knowledge about plant genetic resources. IPRs are created to generate incentives and interests to promote innovation. The protection of traditional knowledge does not qualify this facet of IPRs; therefore, it fails to justify the essence of this property right. Conclusions and Suggestions Biopiracy is a matter of hot debate and a harsh reality. As observed above, the significance of traditional knowledge for indigenous communities surpasses their need to commercialize such knowledge, and therefore, adverse privatization is derogatory to the interests of these communities. The idea of benefit-sharing should be generously adopted in the event of granting exclusive rights over such commodities and information to maintain a fine balance of interests while also benefiting the public at large. For realizing better outcomes in favor of this fine balance, the provisions within the Trade-Related Aspect on Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement and CBD should be harmonized to introduce amendments within the TRIPS. India has also been vehemently suggesting that TRIPS should incorporate that where patents founded based on traditional knowledge are sought, there should be an attached proof that the prior consent of the community and the concerned member state has been acquired. Furthermore, there should be a creation of 'Digital Libraries' to collect and project the details concerning genetic information. It will help in protecting traditional knowledge of indigenous
  • 7. communities as it will act as a public notice to the public and multi-national companies against superseding and not accounting for prior art found in the literature based on traditional knowledge. Lastly, a stronger framework should be endorsed to protect and preserve in the interest of the local and indigenous communities with respect to the information and practices concerning biodiversity. A leading example of this is the Philippines enacting the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act, 1997, which grants indigenous communities control and rights over their traditional knowledge and genetic resources.