Results of the Social Progress Index for the Brazilian Amazon, covering 772 municipalities and nine states. Launched August 23, 2014.

1. ÍNDICE DE PROGRESSO SOCIAL
NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA 2014

2. 2
RESULTS

3. TOP 20: URBAN WITH HIGH LEVELS OF INCOME AND HDI
3
IPS Ranking Municipality
HDI
Category
HDI Income Level
Reales Per Capita
(2010)
Urban/Rural IPS Score
1 Palmas High 0.788 High 1087.35 Urban 71.86
2 Barra do Garças High 0.748 High 789.99 Urban 70.77
3 Cuiabá High 0.785 High 1161.49 Urban 70.44
4 Belém High 0.746 High 853.82 Urban 70.20
5 Novo Alegre Medium 0.699 Medium 433.31 Urban 69.40
6 Pimenteiras do Oeste Medium 0.665 Medium 493.67 Urban 69.14
7 Fátima Medium 0.697 Medium 464.94 Urban 69.04
8 Porto Nacional High 0.74 High 621.10 Urban 69.03
9 Ji-Paraná High 0.714 High 743.35 Urban 68.31
10 Tangará da Serra High 0.729 High 846.59 Urban 68.25
11 Nova Santa Helena High 0.714 High 824.04 Urban 68.05
12 São José dos Quatro Marcos High 0.719 High 653.02 Urban 68.03
13 Lucas do Rio Verde High 0.768 High 938.65 Urban 67.57
14 Combinado Medium 0.697 Medium 455.39 Urban 67.42
15 Porto Rico do Maranhão Medium 0.615 Low 227.87 Rural 67.37
16 Jaciara High 0.735 High 742.81 Urban 67.29
17 Campo Verde High 0.75 High 878.37 Urban 67.07
18 Guiratinga High 0.705 Medium 542.02 Urban 67.04
19 Pontal do Araguaia High 0.734 Medium 589.32 Urban 66.91
20 Gurupi High 0.759 High 778.90 Urban 66.76

4. BOTTOM 20:RURAL AND URBAN, LOW LEVELS OF INCOME AND HDI
4
IPS Ranking Municipality
HDI
Category
HDI Income Level
Reales Per Capita
(2010)
Urban/Rural IPS Score
753 São João do Carú Low 0.509 Low 165.38 Urban 48.22
754 Itaipava do Grajaú Low 0.518 Low 136.77 Rural 48.20
755 Atalaia do Norte Very Low 0.45 Low 159.21 Rural 47.98
756 Mirador Low 0.545 Low 163.97 Rural 47.96
757 Penalva Low 0.554 Low 201.99 Rural 47.70
758 Portel Very Low 0.483 Low 195.22 Rural 47.60
759 Acará Low 0.506 Low 199.34 Rural 47.53
760 Marechal Thaumaturgo Low 0.501 Low 157.27 Rural 47.02
761 Recursolândia Low 0.5 Low 168.85 Urban 46.69
762 Amajari Very Low 0.484 Low 121.32 Rural 46.48
763 Porto Walter Low 0.532 Low 204.19 Rural 46.15
764 Barra do Ouro Medium 0.603 Low 256.28 Urban 45.89
765 Pacajá Low 0.515 Low 231.91 Rural 45.47
766 Santa Rosa do Purus Low 0.517 Low 201.58 Rural 45.22
767 Cumaru do Norte Low 0.55 Medium 417.06 Rural 44.81
768 Nova Esperança do Piriá Low 0.502 Low 160.34 Rural 44.81
769 Anapu Low 0.548 Low 266.28 Rural 44.72
770 Alto Alegre Low 0.542 Low 201.32 Rural 43.68
771 Brejo de Areia Low 0.519 Low 187.95 Urban 42.95
772 Jordão Very Low 0.469 Low 178.03 Rural 42.31

5. IPS AMAZÔNIA
5
Urban: 492 municipalities
Rural: 280 municipalities
High income: 77 municipalities
Middle income: 345 municipalities
Low income: 350 municipalities
High: 78 municipalities
Medium: 366 municipalities
Low : 306 municipalities
Very Low: 22 municipalities
58.66
54.93
50
55
60
65
70
75
Urban Rural
Average IPS by type of Municipality
63.62
58.84
54.41
50
55
60
65
70
75
High Medium Low
Average IPS by Income Level
64.50
58.92
53.97
51.46
50
55
60
65
70
75
High Medium Low Very Low
Average IPS by HDI Category

6. 6
GEOGRAPHICAL
DISTRIBUTION OF
SOCIAL PROGRESS

7. IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014 OVERALL PERFORMANCE
7
Max score: 71.86
Min score: 42.31
Average: 57.32
The Amazonas state scored the lowest levels.

8. BASIC HUMAN NEEDS
8
Max score: 83.72
Min score: 31.23
Average: 58.75
Mato Grosso state scored the highest levels.

9. FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING
9
Max score: 81.48
Min score: 41.98
Average: 64.85
Maranhao state shows very diverse situations.

10. OPPORTUNITY
10
Max score: 69.22
Min score: 30.87
Average: 48.33
Pará and Amazonas are the worst states.

11. 11
INCOME VS
IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014

12. IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014 VS. REALES PER CAPITA
CORRELATION: 0.62
12

13. BASIC HUMAN NEEDS VS REALES PER CAPITA
CORRELATION: 0.38
13

14. FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING VS REALES PER CAPITA
CORRELATION: 0.33
14

15. OPPORTUNITY VS REALES PER CAPITA
CORRELATION: 0.72
15

16. CORRELATIONS WITH REALES PER CAPITA
16
•Shelter, Access to Basic Knowledge, and Access to Higher Education are highly
correlated with income per capita.
•Personal Safety is negatively correlated with income per capita.
RDPC per capita: Ratio between the sum of the income of all individuals living in permanent private households and the total number of these individuals. Values in Aug/2010 reales.
Source: UNDP.
NBMC WS S PS
0.28 0.25 0.75 -0.33
ABK AIC HW ES
0.67 0.16 0.22 0.12
PR PFC TI AHE
0.44 0.55 0.32 0.80
IPS Amazônia
Basic Human Needs
Foundations of Wellbeing
0.38
0.62
0.33
Opportunity
0.72

17. 17
POVERTY VS
IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014

18. IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014 VS % OF POOR PEOPLE
CORRELATION: -0.67
18

19. 19
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS VS % OF POOR PEOPLE
CORRELATION: -0.40

20. 20
FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING VS % OF POOR PEOPLE
CORRELATION: -0.39

21. 21
OPPORTUNITY VS % OF POOR PEOPLE
CORRELATION: -0.75

22. CORRELATIONS WITH POVERTY
22
•Social progress has a strong negative correlation with poverty.
•Shelter, Access to Basic Knowledge and Access to Higher Education have
strong negative correlation with poverty.
•43% of municipalities have more than 40% of their population living in poverty.
PMPOB (% of poor people ): Share of individuals with household income per capita equal to, or less than, R$ 140.00 per month (in Aug/2010 reals). The population of individuals is limited
to those living in permanent private households. Source: UNDP.
NBMC WS S PS
-0.24 -0.22 -0.84 0.34
ABK AIC HW ES
-0.73 -0.22 -0.15 -0.01
PR PFC TI AHE
-0.50 -0.61 -0.32 -0.75
-0.40
IPS Amazônia
-0.67
Basic Human Needs
Foundations of Wellbeing
-0.39
Opportunity
-0.75

23. 23
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT VS
IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014

24. 24
IPS AMAZÔNIA 2014 VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
CORRELATION: 0.75

25. 25
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
CORRELATION: 0.49

26. 26
FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
CORRELATION: 0.40

27. 27
OPPORTUNITY VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
CORRELATION: 0.82

28. CORRELATIONS WITH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
28
•Social progress has a strong relation with HDI.
•Shelter, Access to Basic Knowledge and Access to Higher Education have
strong positive correlation with HDI.
NBMC WS S PS
0.26 0.38 0.83 -0.31
ABK AIC HW ES
0.85 0.19 0.15 0.03
PR PFC TI AHE
0.45 0.64 0.45 0.880.82
IPS Amazônia
0.75
Basic Human Needs
0.49
Foundations of Wellbeing
0.40
Opportunity

29. 29
OVERPERFORMERS AND
UNDERPERFORMERS

30. 10 LARGEST OVERPERFORMERS: ACTUAL VS. EXPECTED IPS
AMAZÔNIA BY INCOME GROUP
30
Municipality
Difference
(Actual -
Expected)
IPS
Ranking
Barra do Garças 7.17 2
Porto Nacional 7.13 8
Belém 6.05 4
Palmas 5.99 1
São José dos Quatro Marcos 5.78 12
Ji-Paraná 5.14 9
Santa Carmem 4.32 26
Pedro Afonso 4.24 34
Tangará da Serra 4.16 10
Nova Santa Helena 4.15 11
High
Municipality
Difference
(Actual -
Expected)
IPS
Ranking
Novo Alegre 10.06 5
Fátima 9.20 7
Pimenteiras do Oeste 8.88 6
Lavandeira 7.88 46
Combinado 7.73 14
Santa Fé do Araguaia 7.61 47
Crixás do Tocantins 7.35 53
Parintins 6.91 74
Pequizeiro 6.81 76
Indiavaí 6.73 29
Medium
Municipality
Difference
(Actual -
Expected)
IPS
Ranking
Porto Rico do Maranhão 12.59 15
Santa Cruz do Arari 12.36 61
Rio da Conceição 10.15 38
Magalhães Barata 9.48 81
Cedral 9.23 94
Santa Filomena do Maranhão 8.11 270
Peixe-Boi 7.28 124
Loreto 7.16 195
Carutapera 7.12 155
Cachoeira do Arari 7.11 178
Low

31. 31
10 LARGEST UNDERPERFORMERS: ACTUAL VS. EXPECTED IPS
AMAZÔNIA BY INCOME GROUP
Municipality
Difference
(Actual -
Expected)
IPS
Ranking
Novo Progresso -9.83 640
Ipiranga do Norte -5.94 351
Santa Cruz do Xingu -5.84 430
Brasnorte -5.63 447
Campos de Júlio -5.51 200
Nova Bandeirantes -5.43 427
Alta Floresta -4.67 359
Canarana -3.70 261
Querência -3.58 323
Ariquemes -3.50 288
High
Municipality
Difference
(Actual -
Expected)
IPS
Ranking
Cumaru do Norte -14.26 767
Bom Jesus do Araguaia -11.38 738
Campo Novo de Rondônia -11.21 729
Pedra Branca do Amaparí -8.95 722
Grajaú -8.79 739
Nova Ipixuna -8.09 737
Santa Maria do Tocantins -8.02 726
Nova Ubiratã -7.99 588
Uruará -7.93 719
Seringueiras -7.57 665
Medium
Municipality
Difference
(Actual -
Expected)
IPS
Ranking
Cumaru do Norte -14.26 767
Bom Jesus do Araguaia -11.38 738
Campo Novo de Rondônia -11.21 729
Pedra Branca do Amaparí -8.95 722
Grajaú -8.79 739
Nova Ipixuna -8.09 737
Santa Maria do Tocantins -8.02 726
Nova Ubiratã -7.99 588
Uruará -7.93 719
Seringueiras -7.57 665
Medium

32. 32
IPS AMAZÔNIA
32
IPS AMAZÔNIA