SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  45
The Google driverless car is a project by Google that
involves developing technology for autonomous cars.
The Google Driverless Car is like any car, but:
• It can steer itself while looking out for obstacles.
• It can accelerate itself to the correct speed limit.
• It can stop and go itself based on any traffic condition.
 The software powering Google's cars is called Google
Chauffeur.
It can take its passengers anywhere it wants to go
safely, legally, and comfortably.
Currently being led by Sebastian Thrun ,former director
of Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and co-
inventor of Google’s Street View.
DATE DESCRIPTION
Current (2015) The project is currently being led by Google engineer Sebastian
Thrun, director of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence
Laboratory and co-inventor of Google Street View
Past (2005)
Thrun's team created the robotic vehicle Stanley which won the
2005 DARPA Grand Challenge and its US$2 million prize from
the United States DOD (Department of Defense).
2011 U.S. state of Nevada passed a law on June 29, 2011.
2012
It went into effect on March 1, 2012, and the Nevada Department
of Motor Vehicles issued the first license for a self-driven car in
May 2012.
2012 The license was issued to a Toyota Prius.
Automobiles play a significant role in our lives and afford
many benefits to society.
But no other invention in the history of civilian technology
has caused as much harm as the automobile.
Every 30 seconds, someone dies in a traffic accident,
adding up to well over 1 million deaths each year.
human error is the cause of over 90% of automobile
accidents..
The inefficiencies related with the automobile usage is
staggering.
The technology behind autonomous driving is:
• Sensor-based implementation
• Connected Vehicle implementation
Google is approaching autonomous vehicles as an
opportunity to organize and process mapping and
geographic Information to many mobile computers – the
vehicles themselves.
10 Astonishing technologies that power Google self-driving
car :
• Laser range finder
•Front Camera
•Bump mounted Radars
•Aerial
•Ultrasonic Sensors
•Devices within the car
•Synergitic combining of sensors
•Programmed to interpret common road signs
•Mapping in advance
•Programming Real life behaviour
1. Laser range finder
The heart of Google’s self driving car.
LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging, also LADAR, sometimes Laser Imaging
Detection and Ranging) is an optical remote sensing technology .
Measure the distance to, or other properties of, targets by illuminating the target
with laser light and analyzing the backscattered light.
With its Array of 64 laser beams, this camera creates 3D images of objects
helping the car see hazards along the way.
calculates how far an object is from the moving vehicle based on the time it
takes for the laser beams to hit the object and come back.
 Create images for objects in an impressive 200m range.
 Google’s self-driving car uses Velodyne LIDAR to electronically “see” the
environment.
 The module is set inside a rotating drum.
 provides additional positional data, but also identifies other cars, bicycles,
pedestrians, and road hazards.
 By sending out laser beams in all directions, collecting the reflected energy,
and performing some nifty high-speed computer processing, the vehicle can
create a real-time, virtual map of the obstacles in its path.
2. Front Camera
Used for near vision
Mounted on the windshield helping the car ‘see’ objects right in front
of it.
Detects and record information about road signs and traffic lights,
which is intelligently interpreted by the car’s in built software
3.Bump mounted Radars
Four Radars are mounted on the car’s front and rear bumpers.
Enables the car to be aware of vehicles in front of it and behind it.
The radar sensor on the car’s bumpers keeps a ‘digital eye’ on the car
ahead.
The software is programmed to (at all times) maintain a distance of 2-4
seconds (it could be even higher) vis-à-vis the car ahead of it.
 The car will automatically speed up or slow down depending on the
behaviour of the car/driver ahead.
Google’s self driving cars use this technology to keep passengers and
other motorists safe by avoiding bumps and crashes
4.Aerial
Car receives information about the precise location of the car, with the
help of GPS Satellites.
 The car’s GPS inertial navigation unit works with the sensors to help the
car localize itself.
GPS estimates may be off by several meters due to signal disturbances
and other interferences from the atmosphere
To minimize the degree of uncertainty, the GPS data is compared with
sensor map data previously collected from the same location.
As the vehicle moves, the vehicle’s internal map is updated with
new positional information displayed by the sensors.
5.Ultrrasonic Sensors
Keep track of the movements of the car and will alert the car about the
obstacles in the rear.
These ultrasonic sensors are ready in action in some of the technologically
advanced cars today.
Cars that offers automatic ‘Reverse Park Assist’ technology utilize such
sensors to help navigate that car into tight reverse parking spots.
These sensors get activated when the car is engaged in the reverse gear.
.
.
6.Devices within car
Inside the car are altimeters ,gyroscope, and tachymeters
that determine the very precise position of the car .
This offers highly accurate data for the car to operate safely.
7.Synergitic combining of sensors
All the data gathered by these sensors is collated and interpreted
together by the car’s CPU or inbuilt software system to create a
safe driving experience.
8.Programmed to interpret common road signs
Software that rightly interpret common road behaviour and motorist
signs.
• For example:
if a cyclist gestures that he intends to make a manoeuvre, the
driverless car interprets it correctly and slow down to allow the
motorists to turn.
Predetermined shape and motion descriptors are programmed into the
system to help the car make intelligent decisions.
programs fed into the car’s central processing unit will work
simultaneously, helping the car make safe and intelligent decisions on
busy roads.
9.Mapping in advance
It maps out the route and it’s road conditions including poles, road
markers , road signs and more.
Before a self-driven car is tested , a regular car is driven along the route
Map is fed into the car’s software helping the car identify what is a
regular part of the road.
As the car moves , Velodyne Laser range finder kicks in and generates a
detailed 3D map of the environment at that moment.
The car compares this map with the pre-existing map to figure out the non
standard aspects in the road, rightly identifying them as pedestrians and
other motorists , thus avoiding them.
10. Programming real life behaviour
Google Engineers have programmed some real life behaviour in these
cars.
While the vehicle does slow down to allow motorists to go ahead,
especially in 4 way interactions, the car has also been programmed to
advance ahead if it detects that the other vehicle is not moving.
 The car itself is limited to 25 mph
 Minimises the kinetic energy it could carry
into a crash if one should happen.
 The front of the car is also made to be as
kind to pedestrians
 With a foam bumper and a flexible
windscreen that is designed to absorb
energy from an impact with a person’s body.
 “Fault-tolerant architecture”
 Seat belts are also provided
 Emergency stop button that passengers can hit at anytime.
 Defensive, considerate driving style that is meant to protect both the
passengers and other road users
 The car will wait a second after the traffic lights turn green before it
moves off, although this could incur the anger of drivers stuck behind it.
 Insurance underwriting is a complex issue for autonomous vehicles.
 The question of who “owns” the risk if an autonomous vehicle is in an
accident
 Will need to be addressed for convergence solutions to gain mass-market
adoption.
 Automobile makers and Google have lobbied state governments to
absolve them of any such liability successfully in Nevada and
unsuccessfully in California.
 Google's vehicles have traversed San Francisco's Lombard Street,
famed for its steep hairpin turns, and through city traffic
 The system drives at the speed limit it has stored on its maps and
maintains its distance from other vehicles using its system of
sensors.
 On March 28, 2012, Google posted a YouTube video showing
Steve Mahan, a resident of Morgan Hill, California, being taken
on a ride in Google's self-driving Toyota Prius.
 In August 2012, the team have completed over 300,000
autonomous-driving miles (500,000 km) accident-free.
 Four U.S. states have passed laws permitting autonomous
cars as of December 2013:
*Nevada, Florida, California, and Michigan.
 A law proposed in Texas would establish criteria for
allowing "autonomous motor vehicles".
.
In April 2014, the team announced that their
vehicles have now logged nearly 700,000
autonomous miles (1.1 million km).
In June 2015, the team announced that their vehicles have now
driven over 1 million miles.
In the process they had encountered 200,000 stop signs,
600,000 traffic lights, and 180 million other vehicles
Google also announced its prototype vehicles were being road
tested in Mountain View, California. During testing, the
prototypes' speed cannot exceed 25 mph and will have safety
drivers aboard the entire time.
In late May, Google revealed a new prototype of its
driverless car, which had no steering wheel, gas pedal, or
brake pedal, being 100% autonomous
In June 2015, Google's 23 self-driving cars have been involved
in 12 minor traffic accidents on public roads
Google maintains that in all cases the vehicle itself was not at
fault because the cars were either being manually driven or the
driver of another vehicle was at fault.
In 2010, an incident involved a Google driverless car being rear- ended
while stopped at a traffic light.
In August 2011, a Google driverless car was involved in a crash
near Google headquarters in Mountain View, California.
In June 2015, Google founder Sergey Brin confirmed that
there had been 12 accidents,
• Eight of which involved being rear-ended at a stop sign or traffic
light.
• two in which the vehicle was side-swiped by another driver
• one of which involved another driver rolling through a stop sign,
and
• one where a Google employee was manually driving the car
Cars rely primarily on pre-programmed route data, they do
not obey temporary traffic lights
In some situations, revert to a slower "extra cautious" mode
in complex unmapped intersections
The vehicle has difficulty identifying when objects, such as
trash and light debris, are harmless, causing the vehicle to
veer unnecessarily.
The lidar technology cannot spot some potholes or discern
when humans , such as a police officer, are signaling the car
to stop. Google projects having these issues fixed by 2020.
If Google’s self driving car comes true, we could soon have hundreds
of millions of networked self-driving cars with connected power trains
and ECUs, all potentially open to hacking.
Numerous security threats will arise once personal mobility is
dominated by self-driving vehicles
Unauthorized parties, hackers, or even terrorists could capture
data, alter records, instigate attacks on systems, compromise driver
privacy by tracking individual vehicles, or identify residences.
They could provide bogus information to drivers, masquerade as a
different vehicle, or use denial-of-service attacks to bring down the
network
 System security will undoubtedly become a paramount issue for
transportation systems with the successful deployment of integrated
sensor-based and cooperative vehicles
As the use of autonomous and connected vehicle solutions expands,
maintaining individual privacy within the transportation system may
become even more arduous
 cost will be an issue for driverless and self-driving car
technologies well into the future
 The featured Prius, which starts at around $24,000, is optioned
up with a –
•$75,000 to $80,000 Velodyne LIDAR system,
•visual and radar sensors estimated to cost about $10,000,
•and a nearly $200,000 GPS array.
 Not to mention the cost of the driving computer and software.
 It may cost more than a Ferrari 599.
“Driverless car” still illegal in 50 states
•But progress to accepting these cars is happening…
•Nevada Department of Transportation: developing regulations to
driverless cars with a goal for it to go mainstream
•License plates issued in Nevada for autonomous cars will have a
red background and feature an infinity symbol (∞) on the left side-
best way to represent the 'car of the future'
Impacts on Taxi/ Public transport industry
•The arrival of fully autonomous cars will likely reduce the demand for
professional drivers of taxis, limousines, and trucks
•Unions for the various drivers will likely respond by introducing doubt
about the safety of self-driving vehicles and lobbying against them
Political & Regulatory Issues
who is to blame in an accident?
Google?
Car Mechanics?
Car Owner?
Passenger?
Political & Regulatory Issues
Can “passengers” be intoxicated?
 Social issues
WHO can be the “driver”?
Age Limits?
Driving licenses?
• Fewer traffic collisions
•Increased roadway capacity
•Higher speed limit
•Removal of constraints on occupants' state
•Reduction of physical space required for vehicle parking.
•Reduction in the need for traffic police and premium
on vehicle insurance
•Smoother ride
•Removal of the steering wheel
•Liability for damage.
•Resistance by individuals to forfeit control of their cars.
•Software reliability.
•Competition for the radio spectrum desired for the car's
communication.
•require very high-quality specialized maps to operate
properly
•Current police and other pedestrian gestures and non-verbal
cues are not adapted to autonomous driving
•Current road infrastructure may need changes for autonomous
cars to function optimally.
• Some examples include traffic and street light upgrades
that communicate with autonomous vehicles.
 Demand is higher.
 Automated driving means more people can use cars, and more cars can
be fitted safely on roads.
Google’s vision for this kind of self-driving car isn’t an exact replacement for
the one parked outside your home
They are designed to be more like shared vehicles, possibly within a family
or more likely as a replacement for taxis.
Google says the cars should be road-ready by early next year, but that
testing would take more than two years
Very useful .
Human safety, infrastructure efficiency, quality of life
and a ready customer base are just a few of the key
factors
 Vehicles could be ready for market in as little as three
to five years.
closer to a product people can actually use.
•www.google.com
•www.national.co.uk
•www.collegelib.com
•www.rand.org
•www.slideshare.com
Google Driverless Car Technology

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehiclesAutonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehiclesKomal Wadhwa
 
Self driving car
Self driving carSelf driving car
Self driving carzebatasneem
 
Self-driving cars are here
Self-driving cars are hereSelf-driving cars are here
Self-driving cars are hereAndrew Ng
 
Autonomous Vehicles
Autonomous VehiclesAutonomous Vehicles
Autonomous VehiclesYamini Verma
 
Self Driving Car Seminar presentation
Self Driving Car Seminar presentationSelf Driving Car Seminar presentation
Self Driving Car Seminar presentationBittu Kumar
 
Google Driverless Cars
Google Driverless Cars Google Driverless Cars
Google Driverless Cars Gopikrishna VM
 
GOOGLE CAR(autonomous car)
GOOGLE CAR(autonomous  car)GOOGLE CAR(autonomous  car)
GOOGLE CAR(autonomous car)SACHIN KS
 
GOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CAR
GOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CARGOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CAR
GOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CARjolsnaj
 
Autonomous car
Autonomous carAutonomous car
Autonomous carAnil kale
 
Machine Learning & Self-Driving Cars
Machine Learning & Self-Driving CarsMachine Learning & Self-Driving Cars
Machine Learning & Self-Driving CarsChristopher Mohritz
 

Tendances (20)

Self driving car
Self driving carSelf driving car
Self driving car
 
Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehiclesAutonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehicles
 
Self driving car
Self driving carSelf driving car
Self driving car
 
Autonomous car
Autonomous carAutonomous car
Autonomous car
 
Autonomous Cars
Autonomous CarsAutonomous Cars
Autonomous Cars
 
Self-driving cars are here
Self-driving cars are hereSelf-driving cars are here
Self-driving cars are here
 
Self driving car
Self driving carSelf driving car
Self driving car
 
Autonomous Vehicles
Autonomous VehiclesAutonomous Vehicles
Autonomous Vehicles
 
Autonomous cars
Autonomous carsAutonomous cars
Autonomous cars
 
Autonomous car
Autonomous carAutonomous car
Autonomous car
 
Autonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehiclesAutonomous vehicles
Autonomous vehicles
 
Self Driving Car Seminar presentation
Self Driving Car Seminar presentationSelf Driving Car Seminar presentation
Self Driving Car Seminar presentation
 
Google Driverless Cars
Google Driverless Cars Google Driverless Cars
Google Driverless Cars
 
GOOGLE CAR(autonomous car)
GOOGLE CAR(autonomous  car)GOOGLE CAR(autonomous  car)
GOOGLE CAR(autonomous car)
 
GOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CAR
GOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CARGOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CAR
GOOGLE'S AUTONOMUS CAR
 
Autonomous car
Autonomous carAutonomous car
Autonomous car
 
autonomous car
autonomous carautonomous car
autonomous car
 
Self driving car
Self driving carSelf driving car
Self driving car
 
Autonomous car
Autonomous carAutonomous car
Autonomous car
 
Machine Learning & Self-Driving Cars
Machine Learning & Self-Driving CarsMachine Learning & Self-Driving Cars
Machine Learning & Self-Driving Cars
 

Similaire à Google Driverless Car Technology

Google driverless car with working
Google driverless car with workingGoogle driverless car with working
Google driverless car with workingPiyush tyagi
 
Google self driving car technology
Google self driving car technology Google self driving car technology
Google self driving car technology suraj bhatta
 
Google Self Driving Car
Google Self Driving CarGoogle Self Driving Car
Google Self Driving Carfirstmsc
 
Google driverless car
Google driverless carGoogle driverless car
Google driverless carpiyupatel99
 
(The google car) Presentation
(The google car) Presentation(The google car) Presentation
(The google car) PresentationAsif Choudhury
 
Driverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent Transportation
Driverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent TransportationDriverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent Transportation
Driverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent TransportationIJERA Editor
 
Google Driverless Car Final
Google Driverless Car FinalGoogle Driverless Car Final
Google Driverless Car Finalnandini sharma
 
Google car (self driving car )
Google car (self driving car )Google car (self driving car )
Google car (self driving car )imrana326
 
GOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptx
GOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptxGOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptx
GOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptxPRINCEROXX2
 
Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...
Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...
Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...Ditrendia - Digital Marketing Trends
 
ALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docx
ALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docxALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docx
ALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docxgalerussel59292
 
google driver less car
google driver less cargoogle driver less car
google driver less carPratheesh Nair
 
Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892
Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892
Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892syedjabir
 

Similaire à Google Driverless Car Technology (20)

Google driverless car with working
Google driverless car with workingGoogle driverless car with working
Google driverless car with working
 
Autonomous Vehicles
Autonomous VehiclesAutonomous Vehicles
Autonomous Vehicles
 
Google car
Google carGoogle car
Google car
 
DriverlessCars
DriverlessCarsDriverlessCars
DriverlessCars
 
Google self driving car technology
Google self driving car technology Google self driving car technology
Google self driving car technology
 
Google Self Driving Car
Google Self Driving CarGoogle Self Driving Car
Google Self Driving Car
 
GOOGLE DRIVERLESS CAR
GOOGLE DRIVERLESS CAR GOOGLE DRIVERLESS CAR
GOOGLE DRIVERLESS CAR
 
Google driverless car
Google driverless carGoogle driverless car
Google driverless car
 
Datacommunication presentation
Datacommunication presentationDatacommunication presentation
Datacommunication presentation
 
(The google car) Presentation
(The google car) Presentation(The google car) Presentation
(The google car) Presentation
 
Driverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent Transportation
Driverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent TransportationDriverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent Transportation
Driverless Vehicles: Future Outlook on Intelligent Transportation
 
Autonomouscar
Autonomouscar Autonomouscar
Autonomouscar
 
Google Driverless Car Final
Google Driverless Car FinalGoogle Driverless Car Final
Google Driverless Car Final
 
Google Car
Google CarGoogle Car
Google Car
 
Google car (self driving car )
Google car (self driving car )Google car (self driving car )
Google car (self driving car )
 
GOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptx
GOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptxGOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptx
GOOGLE SELF DRIVING CAR.pptx
 
Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...
Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...
Tendencias: Cómo nos va a afectar el Internet de las cosas - Self Driving Car...
 
ALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docx
ALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docxALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docx
ALKATAN 1Google CarAs we know the trends are being influence.docx
 
google driver less car
google driver less cargoogle driver less car
google driver less car
 
Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892
Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892
Googlecar 150915202230-lva1-app6892
 

Dernier

Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...Erbil Polytechnic University
 
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxMine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxRomil Mishra
 
Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________
Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________
Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________Romil Mishra
 
multiple access in wireless communication
multiple access in wireless communicationmultiple access in wireless communication
multiple access in wireless communicationpanditadesh123
 
CS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdf
CS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdfCS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdf
CS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdfBalamuruganV28
 
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdfDEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdfAkritiPradhan2
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionMebane Rash
 
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTESCME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTESkarthi keyan
 
Secure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech Labs
Secure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech LabsSecure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech Labs
Secure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech Labsamber724300
 
Comprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdf
Comprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdfComprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdf
Comprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdfalene1
 
STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subject
STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subjectSTATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subject
STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subjectGayathriM270621
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork
 
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTFUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTSneha Padhiar
 
70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training
70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training
70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical trainingGladiatorsKasper
 
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTIONTHE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTIONjhunlian
 
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdfRobotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdfsahilsajad201
 
List of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdf
List of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdfList of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdf
List of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdfisabel213075
 
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument methodLevelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument methodManicka Mamallan Andavar
 
Virtual memory management in Operating System
Virtual memory management in Operating SystemVirtual memory management in Operating System
Virtual memory management in Operating SystemRashmi Bhat
 

Dernier (20)

Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
 
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxMine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
 
Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________
Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________
Gravity concentration_MI20612MI_________
 
multiple access in wireless communication
multiple access in wireless communicationmultiple access in wireless communication
multiple access in wireless communication
 
CS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdf
CS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdfCS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdf
CS 3251 Programming in c all unit notes pdf
 
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptxDesigning pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
 
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdfDEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
 
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTESCME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
 
Secure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech Labs
Secure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech LabsSecure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech Labs
Secure Key Crypto - Tech Paper JET Tech Labs
 
Comprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdf
Comprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdfComprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdf
Comprehensive energy systems.pdf Comprehensive energy systems.pdf
 
STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subject
STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subjectSTATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subject
STATE TRANSITION DIAGRAM in psoc subject
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
 
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTFUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
 
70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training
70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training
70 POWER PLANT IAE V2500 technical training
 
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTIONTHE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
 
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdfRobotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
 
List of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdf
List of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdfList of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdf
List of Accredited Concrete Batching Plant.pdf
 
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument methodLevelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
 
Virtual memory management in Operating System
Virtual memory management in Operating SystemVirtual memory management in Operating System
Virtual memory management in Operating System
 

Google Driverless Car Technology

  • 1.
  • 2. The Google driverless car is a project by Google that involves developing technology for autonomous cars. The Google Driverless Car is like any car, but: • It can steer itself while looking out for obstacles. • It can accelerate itself to the correct speed limit. • It can stop and go itself based on any traffic condition.
  • 3.  The software powering Google's cars is called Google Chauffeur. It can take its passengers anywhere it wants to go safely, legally, and comfortably. Currently being led by Sebastian Thrun ,former director of Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and co- inventor of Google’s Street View.
  • 4. DATE DESCRIPTION Current (2015) The project is currently being led by Google engineer Sebastian Thrun, director of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and co-inventor of Google Street View Past (2005) Thrun's team created the robotic vehicle Stanley which won the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge and its US$2 million prize from the United States DOD (Department of Defense). 2011 U.S. state of Nevada passed a law on June 29, 2011. 2012 It went into effect on March 1, 2012, and the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles issued the first license for a self-driven car in May 2012. 2012 The license was issued to a Toyota Prius.
  • 5. Automobiles play a significant role in our lives and afford many benefits to society. But no other invention in the history of civilian technology has caused as much harm as the automobile. Every 30 seconds, someone dies in a traffic accident, adding up to well over 1 million deaths each year. human error is the cause of over 90% of automobile accidents..
  • 6. The inefficiencies related with the automobile usage is staggering. The technology behind autonomous driving is: • Sensor-based implementation • Connected Vehicle implementation Google is approaching autonomous vehicles as an opportunity to organize and process mapping and geographic Information to many mobile computers – the vehicles themselves.
  • 7.
  • 8. 10 Astonishing technologies that power Google self-driving car : • Laser range finder •Front Camera •Bump mounted Radars •Aerial •Ultrasonic Sensors
  • 9. •Devices within the car •Synergitic combining of sensors •Programmed to interpret common road signs •Mapping in advance •Programming Real life behaviour
  • 10. 1. Laser range finder The heart of Google’s self driving car. LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging, also LADAR, sometimes Laser Imaging Detection and Ranging) is an optical remote sensing technology . Measure the distance to, or other properties of, targets by illuminating the target with laser light and analyzing the backscattered light. With its Array of 64 laser beams, this camera creates 3D images of objects helping the car see hazards along the way. calculates how far an object is from the moving vehicle based on the time it takes for the laser beams to hit the object and come back.
  • 11.  Create images for objects in an impressive 200m range.  Google’s self-driving car uses Velodyne LIDAR to electronically “see” the environment.  The module is set inside a rotating drum.  provides additional positional data, but also identifies other cars, bicycles, pedestrians, and road hazards.  By sending out laser beams in all directions, collecting the reflected energy, and performing some nifty high-speed computer processing, the vehicle can create a real-time, virtual map of the obstacles in its path.
  • 12. 2. Front Camera Used for near vision Mounted on the windshield helping the car ‘see’ objects right in front of it. Detects and record information about road signs and traffic lights, which is intelligently interpreted by the car’s in built software
  • 13. 3.Bump mounted Radars Four Radars are mounted on the car’s front and rear bumpers. Enables the car to be aware of vehicles in front of it and behind it. The radar sensor on the car’s bumpers keeps a ‘digital eye’ on the car ahead. The software is programmed to (at all times) maintain a distance of 2-4 seconds (it could be even higher) vis-à-vis the car ahead of it.  The car will automatically speed up or slow down depending on the behaviour of the car/driver ahead. Google’s self driving cars use this technology to keep passengers and other motorists safe by avoiding bumps and crashes
  • 14. 4.Aerial Car receives information about the precise location of the car, with the help of GPS Satellites.  The car’s GPS inertial navigation unit works with the sensors to help the car localize itself. GPS estimates may be off by several meters due to signal disturbances and other interferences from the atmosphere To minimize the degree of uncertainty, the GPS data is compared with sensor map data previously collected from the same location. As the vehicle moves, the vehicle’s internal map is updated with new positional information displayed by the sensors.
  • 15. 5.Ultrrasonic Sensors Keep track of the movements of the car and will alert the car about the obstacles in the rear. These ultrasonic sensors are ready in action in some of the technologically advanced cars today. Cars that offers automatic ‘Reverse Park Assist’ technology utilize such sensors to help navigate that car into tight reverse parking spots. These sensors get activated when the car is engaged in the reverse gear. . .
  • 16. 6.Devices within car Inside the car are altimeters ,gyroscope, and tachymeters that determine the very precise position of the car . This offers highly accurate data for the car to operate safely. 7.Synergitic combining of sensors All the data gathered by these sensors is collated and interpreted together by the car’s CPU or inbuilt software system to create a safe driving experience.
  • 17. 8.Programmed to interpret common road signs Software that rightly interpret common road behaviour and motorist signs. • For example: if a cyclist gestures that he intends to make a manoeuvre, the driverless car interprets it correctly and slow down to allow the motorists to turn. Predetermined shape and motion descriptors are programmed into the system to help the car make intelligent decisions. programs fed into the car’s central processing unit will work simultaneously, helping the car make safe and intelligent decisions on busy roads.
  • 18. 9.Mapping in advance It maps out the route and it’s road conditions including poles, road markers , road signs and more. Before a self-driven car is tested , a regular car is driven along the route Map is fed into the car’s software helping the car identify what is a regular part of the road. As the car moves , Velodyne Laser range finder kicks in and generates a detailed 3D map of the environment at that moment. The car compares this map with the pre-existing map to figure out the non standard aspects in the road, rightly identifying them as pedestrians and other motorists , thus avoiding them.
  • 19. 10. Programming real life behaviour Google Engineers have programmed some real life behaviour in these cars. While the vehicle does slow down to allow motorists to go ahead, especially in 4 way interactions, the car has also been programmed to advance ahead if it detects that the other vehicle is not moving.
  • 20.  The car itself is limited to 25 mph  Minimises the kinetic energy it could carry into a crash if one should happen.  The front of the car is also made to be as kind to pedestrians  With a foam bumper and a flexible windscreen that is designed to absorb energy from an impact with a person’s body.  “Fault-tolerant architecture”
  • 21.  Seat belts are also provided  Emergency stop button that passengers can hit at anytime.  Defensive, considerate driving style that is meant to protect both the passengers and other road users  The car will wait a second after the traffic lights turn green before it moves off, although this could incur the anger of drivers stuck behind it.
  • 22.
  • 23.  Insurance underwriting is a complex issue for autonomous vehicles.  The question of who “owns” the risk if an autonomous vehicle is in an accident  Will need to be addressed for convergence solutions to gain mass-market adoption.  Automobile makers and Google have lobbied state governments to absolve them of any such liability successfully in Nevada and unsuccessfully in California.
  • 24.  Google's vehicles have traversed San Francisco's Lombard Street, famed for its steep hairpin turns, and through city traffic  The system drives at the speed limit it has stored on its maps and maintains its distance from other vehicles using its system of sensors.  On March 28, 2012, Google posted a YouTube video showing Steve Mahan, a resident of Morgan Hill, California, being taken on a ride in Google's self-driving Toyota Prius.
  • 25.  In August 2012, the team have completed over 300,000 autonomous-driving miles (500,000 km) accident-free.  Four U.S. states have passed laws permitting autonomous cars as of December 2013: *Nevada, Florida, California, and Michigan.  A law proposed in Texas would establish criteria for allowing "autonomous motor vehicles". . In April 2014, the team announced that their vehicles have now logged nearly 700,000 autonomous miles (1.1 million km).
  • 26. In June 2015, the team announced that their vehicles have now driven over 1 million miles. In the process they had encountered 200,000 stop signs, 600,000 traffic lights, and 180 million other vehicles Google also announced its prototype vehicles were being road tested in Mountain View, California. During testing, the prototypes' speed cannot exceed 25 mph and will have safety drivers aboard the entire time. In late May, Google revealed a new prototype of its driverless car, which had no steering wheel, gas pedal, or brake pedal, being 100% autonomous
  • 27. In June 2015, Google's 23 self-driving cars have been involved in 12 minor traffic accidents on public roads Google maintains that in all cases the vehicle itself was not at fault because the cars were either being manually driven or the driver of another vehicle was at fault. In 2010, an incident involved a Google driverless car being rear- ended while stopped at a traffic light. In August 2011, a Google driverless car was involved in a crash near Google headquarters in Mountain View, California.
  • 28. In June 2015, Google founder Sergey Brin confirmed that there had been 12 accidents, • Eight of which involved being rear-ended at a stop sign or traffic light. • two in which the vehicle was side-swiped by another driver • one of which involved another driver rolling through a stop sign, and • one where a Google employee was manually driving the car
  • 29. Cars rely primarily on pre-programmed route data, they do not obey temporary traffic lights In some situations, revert to a slower "extra cautious" mode in complex unmapped intersections The vehicle has difficulty identifying when objects, such as trash and light debris, are harmless, causing the vehicle to veer unnecessarily. The lidar technology cannot spot some potholes or discern when humans , such as a police officer, are signaling the car to stop. Google projects having these issues fixed by 2020.
  • 30. If Google’s self driving car comes true, we could soon have hundreds of millions of networked self-driving cars with connected power trains and ECUs, all potentially open to hacking. Numerous security threats will arise once personal mobility is dominated by self-driving vehicles Unauthorized parties, hackers, or even terrorists could capture data, alter records, instigate attacks on systems, compromise driver privacy by tracking individual vehicles, or identify residences.
  • 31. They could provide bogus information to drivers, masquerade as a different vehicle, or use denial-of-service attacks to bring down the network  System security will undoubtedly become a paramount issue for transportation systems with the successful deployment of integrated sensor-based and cooperative vehicles As the use of autonomous and connected vehicle solutions expands, maintaining individual privacy within the transportation system may become even more arduous
  • 32.  cost will be an issue for driverless and self-driving car technologies well into the future  The featured Prius, which starts at around $24,000, is optioned up with a – •$75,000 to $80,000 Velodyne LIDAR system, •visual and radar sensors estimated to cost about $10,000, •and a nearly $200,000 GPS array.  Not to mention the cost of the driving computer and software.  It may cost more than a Ferrari 599.
  • 33. “Driverless car” still illegal in 50 states •But progress to accepting these cars is happening… •Nevada Department of Transportation: developing regulations to driverless cars with a goal for it to go mainstream •License plates issued in Nevada for autonomous cars will have a red background and feature an infinity symbol (∞) on the left side- best way to represent the 'car of the future'
  • 34. Impacts on Taxi/ Public transport industry •The arrival of fully autonomous cars will likely reduce the demand for professional drivers of taxis, limousines, and trucks •Unions for the various drivers will likely respond by introducing doubt about the safety of self-driving vehicles and lobbying against them
  • 35. Political & Regulatory Issues who is to blame in an accident? Google? Car Mechanics? Car Owner? Passenger?
  • 36. Political & Regulatory Issues Can “passengers” be intoxicated?
  • 37.  Social issues WHO can be the “driver”? Age Limits? Driving licenses?
  • 38. • Fewer traffic collisions •Increased roadway capacity •Higher speed limit •Removal of constraints on occupants' state •Reduction of physical space required for vehicle parking.
  • 39. •Reduction in the need for traffic police and premium on vehicle insurance •Smoother ride •Removal of the steering wheel
  • 40. •Liability for damage. •Resistance by individuals to forfeit control of their cars. •Software reliability. •Competition for the radio spectrum desired for the car's communication. •require very high-quality specialized maps to operate properly
  • 41. •Current police and other pedestrian gestures and non-verbal cues are not adapted to autonomous driving •Current road infrastructure may need changes for autonomous cars to function optimally. • Some examples include traffic and street light upgrades that communicate with autonomous vehicles.
  • 42.  Demand is higher.  Automated driving means more people can use cars, and more cars can be fitted safely on roads. Google’s vision for this kind of self-driving car isn’t an exact replacement for the one parked outside your home They are designed to be more like shared vehicles, possibly within a family or more likely as a replacement for taxis. Google says the cars should be road-ready by early next year, but that testing would take more than two years
  • 43. Very useful . Human safety, infrastructure efficiency, quality of life and a ready customer base are just a few of the key factors  Vehicles could be ready for market in as little as three to five years. closer to a product people can actually use.