EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx

V. S. B. Engineering College
The Chairman & Expert Members
of
Department Presentation
Dr.K.Umamaheswari,
Professor & Head of the Department
March 11, 2022
SERVICE TO THE SOCIETY THROUGH QUALITY TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Department Of Electrical and Electronics
Engineering
V.S.B. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING

2
 Introduction about the department
 Faculty Level Information
 Student Level Information & achievements
 Criterion I
 Criterion II
 Criterion III
 Criterion IV
 Criterion V
 Criterion VI
 Criterion VII
 Outcome Based Education (OBE)
ENGINEERING

 Degree & Duration : Bachelor of Engineering & 08 Semesters
 Established : 2002
 Current Intake : UG – 60, PG – 18
 NBA Accreditation : 2009, 2018
 Number of Faculty with Ph.D : 04
 Number of Faculty pursuing Ph.D : 04
 STTP/FDP/Symposiums Organized : 04
 Number of MoUs Signed : 06
 Total Laboratories : 06
 Industry Supported Laboratory :Tessolve Semiconductor Private Ltd.
 All the Classrooms are enabled with ICT facilities.
3
ENGINEERING

4
Our Strength Our Best Practices
Received “Permanent Affiliation”
 Consistent Top Academic Result
 Excellent Graduation percentage-97.33%
 Excellent Placement -93.22%
Place for higher Learning
 MOUs with Industries
 Excellent Industry Institute Interaction
 State of art Laboratories
 Visit of Senior Academicians
 Industry supported lab
 Project / Research Lab
 Collaborative Learning
 Participative Learning
 ICT Based Learning
 Experimental Learning
 E-learning through NPTEL
 Project Based Learning
 Students Mentoring
 Career Guidance
 Additional Experiments
Professional Society Activities
 RECAP Sessions
ENGINEERING

5
Year No. of faculty with Ph.D No. of faculty with PG Total Faculty
2021 - 2022 04 09 13
2020 - 2021 06 11 17
2019 - 2020 03 10 13
2018 - 2019 02 11 13
PUBLICATIONS AND CITATIONS  No. of books published: 16
 No. of patents filed & published: 10
 No. of products developed: 06
 Total funds received: Rs.21,25,000
 NPTEL Certifications: 6
 Applied for Grants (SEED): Rs.1.57 Crores
 Tessolve trained Faculty: 02
ENGINEERING

6
Consistency in Admission (%)
 University Ranks - 06
 NPTEL Certifications - 12
 Co Curricular Activities - 217
 Internships - 110
ENGINEERING
YEAR 2021-2022
I 62
II 62
III 58
IV 49
Total 231
Consistency in Results(%)

Vision:
 To create dynamic and challenging electrical engineers with social responsibilities.
Mission:
 To provide technical proficiency by adopting well defined teaching learning process.
 To create an environment to practice ethical codes.
 To prepare the graduates to be professionally competent to meet the industrial needs.
 To motivate the students to pursue higher studies and research activities.
Program Educational Objectives:
 PEO1: Graduates of the program will be able to have a successful career in core and allied engineering or associated
industries or in higher education or as entrepreneurs or in research.
 PEO2: Graduates of the program will be proficient to provide optimized solution for complex engineering problems
in chosen Technical areas.
 PEO3: Graduates of the program are equipped to exhibit continuous improvement in their profession through life-
long learning.
Vision, Mission & PEO
7
CRITERION #1
PEO M1 M2 M3 M4
PEO #1 2 2 3 3
PEO #2 3 1 3 3
PEO #3 1 3 3 2
MAPPING CONSISTENCY OF PEOs WITH MISSION
ENGINEERING

Process of Defining
Vision, Mission and PEO
8
CRITERION #1
DEFINING VISION & MISSION DEFINING PEOs
ENGINEERING

Course components of the
curriculum (R2017) CRITERION #2
Course Component
Curriculum
Content (% of
Total Number of
Credits of the
Program)
Total
Number of
Contact
Hours
Total
Number
of
Credits
POs PSOs
Humanities and Social
Sciences (HS)
11/180=6.119
%
165 11
1,2,5,6,7,8,9,10,
12
1
Basic Sciences (BS)
27/180=15.00
%
405 27 1,2,3,5,7,12 1,2
Engineering
Sciences(Es)
31/180=17.222
%
615 31 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 12 1,2,3
PROFESSIONAL CORE (PC)
Power Systems
22/180=12.222
%
390 22
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
0, 11, 12
1
Power conversion,
Control and
Automation
22/180=12.222
%
435 22
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
0, 11, 12
2
Electrical Machines 18/180=10% 420 18
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
0, 11, 12
3
Electronics
Circuits
11/180=6.112
%
225 11
1,2,3,4
5,6,7,8,9,10, 11,
12
3
Professional Elective
18/180=10.00
%
270 18
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
0, 11, 12
3
Elective (OE) 6/180=3.333% 90 6 1,2,3,4,5, 6 2
Employability
Enhancement
Course(EEC)
14/180=7.77% 435 14
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,
8,9,10,11,12
1,2,3
9
ENGINEERING

Teaching Learning Process
10
CRITERION #2
Curriculum given by the
Affiliated University
CO-PO & CO-
PSO Mapping
for all courses
Identification
of curricular
gaps
Discussion at
Department Advisory
Committee (DAC)
Meeting
Additional
topics/Courses to
bridge the GAP
Analysis of
CO
Attainment
Feedback on
curriculum from
the Stake Holders
PROCESS OF GAP IDENTIFICATION
ENGINEERING

Delivery details of CBS for
attainment of POs & PSOs (Samples)
11
CRITERION #2
S.NO GAP DATE
RESOURCE PERSON WITH
DESIGNATION
% OF
STUDENTS
RELAVANCE TO POS
AND PSOS
1
Embedded System
and its influences
on CPS
02.11.2020
Dr.S.Moorthy,
Associate Professor, National
Institute of Technology,
Trichy
III Year
100
PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4,
PO5, PO6, PO7, PO11,
PO12, PSO 1, PSO2,
PSO3
2
Advanced
electrical machines 27.08.2019
Dr.P.Raja ,
Associate Professor, NIT /EEE
II Year
100
PO 1, PO 2, PO 3, PO 4
,PO 5, PO 6 , PO 12,
& PSO 1 , PSO 3
3
Application of EMT
concepts in
Electrical
Machines
27.08.2018
T.Guna sekaran,
Associate Professor, Higher
College of technology, Muscat
,Sulthanate of Oman
II Year
100
PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4,
PO 6,PO 11,PO12,
PSO 1, PSO 2& PSO
3
ENGINEERING

Quality of Teaching Learning
Process
12
CRITERION #2
ENGINEERING
 Adherence to academic calendar
 Study Materials distribution and verification
 Use of various instructional methods and pedagogical initiatives
 Quality of Question paper setting & Verification
 Conducting Internal Examinations
 Giving individual Assignments to the students
 Identifying Slow Learners & Conducting Coaching classes
 Parents Teachers meeting for the Students to review their performance
 Students’ feedback on teaching-learning process and actions taken

Quality of Teaching Learning
Process
CRITERION #2
S.NO TEACHING METHODS
1 Smart Classroom
2 Google Classroom
3 Model Based Learning
4 Virtual Labs
5 LCD Projectors
6 Power Point Presentation
7 Animated Videos
8 IMPRES - LMS
9 Olympus Great Learning - Teachers Link
10 NPTEL Video Lectures
11 CDs
12 Outcome Based Teaching
S.NO LEARNING METHODS
1 Collaborative Learning
2 Participative Learning
3 ICT Based Learning
4 Experimental Learning
5 LMS - Teaching Materials
6 Olympus Great Learning
7 Project Based Learning
8 NPTEL Session in Library
9 Digital Library
10 Video Conferencing
13
ENGINEERING

14
CRITERION #2
IDENTIFICATION OF BRIGHT & WEAK STUDENTS
Has Student
passed all
courses?
NO
YES
Is CGPA ≥ 7.5 in the
end semester
examination?
NO
YES
Identified as Bright students
 Counseling by Mentor, HoD,Class Advisors
 Remedial classes / Retest after regular working
hours
 Special coaching classes during study holidays
before end semester examinations
 Weak students are grouped with the bright students
to get assistance in their academics
 Providing simplified study material to get through
examination
Identified as weak students
Encouraged to perform better in
subsequent Semesters
Continuous Assessment Test (Internal Test / I / II / III)
marks and results from end semester Examinations
ENGINEERING

15
CRITERION #2
 Mentors/Counselors are appointed for weak students in
class. This is to support them in academic/nonacademic
issues and to counsel them by diagnosing and tracking
their performance and attendance.
 Special coaching classes: Prior to the university exam
special coaching classes are conducted for slow learners
wherein important topics are discussed and trained for
their exams.
 Weak students are grouped with the bright students to get
assistance in their academics. They are also grouped with
bright students while doing their projects and thereby
weak students are getting peer support.
 Representatives of weak students are included in class
committee to share their opinion and requirement.
 Simplified study materials are prepared and distributed
along with 2 mark question banks,13 mark question banks
and University question papers based on students’ need.
INITIATIVES TO SUPPORT WEAK STUDENTS INITIATIVES TO SUPPORT BRIGHT STUDENTS
 The meritorious students are provided with the merit
scholarship for the entire course of study.
 The toppers from each class are rewarded for their
academic achievements in University results. Students
having good attendance are also rewarded.
 Effective placement and training programme is organized
for students.
 Students are motivated by the members of faculty of
department to take part in competitive exams like GATE,
CAT and TANCET.
 Students are guided to present papers at seminar and to
participate in the competitions organized by other
institutions.
 Achievements and innovative explorations of students are
projected in the Newsletter that cheers up the students to
come out with pioneering ideas.
 Bright students are motivated and guided to get University
ranks.
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #2
Online Students’ feedback is collected to assess the effectiveness in
teaching-learning process.
The feedback form elicits the following information:
1. How is the faculty’s approach towards teaching?
2. How has the faculty prepared for the classes?
3. Does the faculty inform you about your expected
competencies, course outcomes?
4. How often does the faculty illustrate the concepts through
examples and Practical applications?
5. Whether Faculty covers syllabus in time?
6. Do you agree that the faculty teaches content beyond syllabus?
7. How does the faculty communicate?
8. Whether Faculty returns answer script in time and produce
helpful comments?
9. How does the faculty identify your strengths and encourage
you with high level of challenges?
10.How does the Faculty counsel & encourage the Students?
16
Program curriculum and
Teaching - Learning Process
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #2
17
Example – Internal Test Question Paper
ENGINEERING

Quality of Students Projects
18
CRITERION #2
TYPES OF PROJECTS CARRIED OUT - PAST FOUR YEARS
 No. of Projects Carried Out
 2017 – 2018 : 15
 2018 – 2019 : 13
 2019 – 2020 : 12
 2020 – 2021 : 15
25%
2%
13%
23%
22%
13%
2% Embedded Systems
Microprocessor and
Microcontroller
Power Electronics
Sensor and System
Renewable Energy Source
Power System
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #2
19
Industry Supported Lab
S.NO NAME OF THE EQUIPMENT
1 ARDUINO UNO & CABLE
2 RASPBERRY PI ZERO W
3 NODEMCU
4 NEO-6M GPS MODULE
5 DHT11 T&H SENSOR
6 BMP280 PRESSURE SENSOR
7 SOIL MOISTURE SENSOR
8 PIR SENSOR
9 SMOKE SENSOR MQ2
10 ULTRASONIC SENSOR HC-SR04
11 PUSH BUTTON
12 REED SWITCH
13 LDR
14 HEART RATE SENSOR PLUSE
15 MQ135 AIR QUALITY SENSOR MODULE
16 MQ3 ALCOHOL SENSOR
17 COMMON ANODE RGB LED
18 BUZZER
19 230VAC TO 5VDC 5A SINGLE CHANNEL RELAY
20 SMALL DC MOTOR
21 SUBMERSIBLE WATER PUMP 3.3V
22 RESISTOR BASIC KIT
23 JUMPER WIRE KIT -10 EACH F2F, F2M, M2M
24 USB CABLE TYPE B TO A
25 18650 LI-ION BATTERY
26 MULTIMETER
27 MINI BREAD BOARD
Program curriculum and Teaching - Learning
Process
ENGINEERING

Industry Institute Interaction
20
CRITERION #2
IMPACT ANALYSIS
 Students observe the actual implementation of theory in the field and understand the skill
sets required in the Industry.
 Students understand how to work as a team and importance of time & punctuality.
 Students take steps for their placement.
 Students get trained in shaping their long term goal.
 Students who perform well may get placement offers.
ENGINEERING
Industry Institute Interaction

Niranjan kumar, Senior Vice
President,
Human Capital NTT Data Global
S.
no.
Date Industrial Experts Programme
Relevance to POs,
PSOs Impact analysis
POs PSOs
1 18.05.2020
Mr. Karthik Krishna
Campus Lead, TCS
Special Session on
“Corporate Expectations”
1,2,7,8,9,
11,12
3
Improved knowledge on
Recruitment Readiness and
students were placed.
2 29.08.2020
Mr. Kanchan Ashok
Khedkar, Associate
General Manager-HR, HCL
Chennai
Special Session on
“Industry Expectations”
1,2,7,8,9,
11,12
3
Improved knowledge on
aptitude and soft skill
trainings
3 21.06.2019
Mr. Niranjankumar
Senior Vice President,
Human Capital
NTT DATA Global Delivery
Services
Special Session on
“Corporate Expectations”
1,2,7,8,
9,11,12
3
Gained knowledge on
Corporate expectations
CRITERION #2
21
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #2
22
S.No. Organisation with which MoU is signed Year of signing Duration
1 Tessolve Semiconductor Private Ltd.,Banglore 2021 3 Years
2 L&T EDU 2021 2 Years
3 Capgemini 2021 3 Years
4 Prolific Systems and Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore 2016 Life Time
5
Livewire - A division of CADD centre training services
Pvt Ltd, Karur
2019 3 Years
6 Era Interfaces Private Limited 2021 3 Years
ENGINEERING

Program Outcomes & Program
Specific Outcomes
CRITERION #3
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
PSO1: Provide optimal solution in the field of power
sector.
PSO2: Apply suitable electronic controllers for power
conversion, control and automation.
PSO3: Make use of appropriate technique and modern
tools to analyze and evaluate the performance of
electrical machines and electronic circuits.
Program Outcomes (POs)
PO1: Engineering knowledge
PO2: Problem analysis
PO3: Design / Development of
solutions
PO4: Conduct investigations of
complex problems
PO5: Modern tool usage
PO6: The Engineer and society
PO7: Environment and
Sustainability
PO8: Ethics
PO9: Individual and team work
PO10: Communication
PO11: Project management and
finance
PO12: Life-long learning
23
ENGINEERING

Program Outcomes & Program
Specific Outcomes
CRITERION #3
24
COURSE OUTCOMES
C204 – ELECTRICAL MACHINES I– II YEAR EEE – III SEMESTER – ODD
C204.1
Summarize the concepts of magnetic circuits and properties of magnetic
materials.
C204.2 Analyze the performance, testing and parallel operation of transformers.
C204.3 Describe the concepts of electro mechanical energy conversion
C204.4 Learn the principle, characteristics and methods of excitation of DC generators.
C204.5 Learn the principle, characteristics and methods of excitation of DC motors.
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C204.1 2 2 3 - - - - - - - 2 - 3 1 2
C204.2 3 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 2 1 3
C204.3 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - 2 2 1 3
C204.4 3 3 2 - - 2 - - - - 2 - 2 1 3
C204.5 3 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - 2 2 3 1 3
AVG 2.6 2.6 2.2 2 - 1.7 - - - - 2 2 2.4 1 2.8
ENGINEERING

Assessment
Type
Assessment Tool Decision Criteria
Data Collection
Frequency
DIRECT
(80%)
1.Internal Assessment Test
Attainment Level 1:
< 50%of students scoring more
than Class Average.
Attainment Level 2:
50% - 60%of students scoring
more than Class Average.
Attainment Level 3:
>60%of students scoring more
than Class Average.
Thrice in every
semester
2.Assignment
Once in every
semester
3.Project Reviews Final semester
4.University Examination
Once in every
Semester
5. Placement, Co Curricular &
Extra Curricular Activities
Yearly Once
INDIRECT
(20%)
1.Alumni Survey
Based on the Rating
Yearly Once
2.Employer Survey Yearly Once
3.Student Exit Survey
End of the
Program
4.Parents Feedback Yearly Once
CRITERION #3
25
ENGINEERING

Assessment Process tools for
Measuring the attainment
CRITERION #3
26
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #3
27
ENGINEERING

28
ENGINEERING
CRITERION #3

CRITERION #3
Course
Name
Course
Outcome
CO
Attainment
(%)
PO 1 PO 2 PO3 PO 4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Electrical
Machines I
CO1 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 - - - - - - - 0.67 - 1.00 0.33 0.67
CO2 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 - 0.33 - - - - - - 0.67 0.33 1.00
CO3 1.20 0.80 0.80 0.80 - - - - - - - - 0.80 0.80 0.40 1.20
CO4 1.20 1.40 1.40 0.93 - - 0.93 - - - - 0.93 - 0.93 0.47 1.40
CO5 1.40 1.40 1.40 0.93 0.93 - 0.93 - - - - 0.93 0.93 1.40 0.47 1.40
POs & PSOs Attainment 1.05 1.05 0.87 0.80 - 0.73 - - - - 0.84 0.87 0.96 0.40 1.13
POs & PSOs ATTAINMENT
29
ENGINEERING

Overall - PO / PSO Attainment
Academic Year: 2020 - 2021
CRITERION #3
S. No.
Assessment
Types
Courses / Activities Contributing to PO
Assessment
Weightage
PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5
1 D Courses 60% 1.11 0.94 0.80 0.71 0.81
2 D Project Viva Voce Assessment 20% 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56
3 ID Exit Survey 5% 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14
4 ID Alumni Survey 5% 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14
5 ID Employer Survey 5% 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09
6 ID Parent’s Survey 5% 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.13
Overall PO Attainment (On a scale of 3) 2.21 2.02 1.90 1.78 1.86
S. No.
Assessment
Types
Courses /Activities
Contributing to PO
Assessment
Weightage
PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
1 D Courses 40% 0.44 0.44 0.49 0.69 0.64 0.51 0.48 0.55 0.46 0.51
2 D
Project Viva Voce
Assessment
20% 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56
3 D
Co-Curricular and
Extra Co-Curricular
20% 0.23 0.34 0.30 0.44 0.30 0.23 0.25 0.40 0.25 0.38
4 ID Exit Survey 5% 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14
5 ID Alumni Survey 5% 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13
6 ID Employer Survey 5% 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10
7 ID Parent’s Survey 5% 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12
Overall POs/PSOs Attainment (On a scale of 3) 1.75 1.83 1.87 2.23 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.04 1.80 1.94
30
ENGINEERING

Final- PO / PSO Attainment
Academic Year: 2020 - 2021
CRITERION #3
PO / PSO PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5 PO 6 PO 7 PO 8 PO 9 PO 10 PO 11 PO 12 PSO 1 PSO 2 PSO3
Attainment 2.21 2.02 1.90 1.78 1.86 1.75 1.83 1.87 2.23 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.04 1.80 1.94
Target 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80
31
ENGINEERING

Item
CAY
(2020-2021)
CAYm1
(2019-2020)
CAYm2
(2018-2019)
Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 60 60 60
Total number of students admitted in first year
minus number of students migrated to other
programs/institutions plus no. of students
migrated to this program (N1)
52 52 50
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the
same batch via lateral entry (N2)
11 06 02
Separate division students, if applicable (N3) 0 0 0
Total number of students admitted in the Program
(N1 + N2 + N3)
63 58 52
Enrolment Ratio (N1/N) 86.67 86.67 83.33
Average Enrolment Ratio 85.56
Average Assessment marks 18
CRITERION #4
32
ENGINEERING

Students Performance
33
CRITERION #4
ITEM
LYG
2017-2018
LYGm1
2016 - 2017
LYGm2
2015-2016
MARKS
No of students admitted (x) 57 46 50
= 25 × Avg. SI
=25*0.29
=7.25
No of students who have graduated without
backlogs (y)
12 10 23
Success Index (SI) = (y/x) 0.21 0.20 0.46
AVERAGE SI 0.29
ITEM
LYG
2017-2018
LYGm1
2016 - 2017
LYGm2
2015-2016
MARKS
No of students admitted (x) 57 46 50 = 15 × Avg. SI
=15*0.97
=14.55
No of students who have graduated with backlogs
(y)
55 46 48
Success Index (SI) = (y/x) 0.96 1.00 0.96
AVERAGE SI 0.97
ENGINEERING
Success rate without backlogs
Success rate with backlogs

34
CRITERION #4
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE – THIRD YEAR
ITEM
CAY m1
2019 - 2020
CAY m2
2018 - 2019
CAY m3
2017 - 2018
MARKS
Mean of CGPA of all successful students (x) 7.54 7.02 7.47
= 1.5 × Avg. API
=1.5*7.34
=11.01
Total no. of successful students (y) 57 46 50
Total no. of students appeared in the exam (z) 57 46 50
API = x*(y/z) 7.54 7.02 7.47
AVERAGE API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 7.34
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE – SECOND YEAR
ITEM
CAY m1
2019 - 2020
CAY m2
2018 - 2019
CAY m3
2017 - 2018
MARKS
Mean of CGPA of all successful students (x) 7.67 7.23 6.86
= 1.5 × Avg. API
=1.5*7.25
=10.88
Total no. of successful students (y) 52 57 46
Total no. of students appeared in the exam (z) 52 57 46
API = x*(y/z) 7.67 7.23 6.86
AVERAGE API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 7.25
ENGINEERING

35
CRITERION #4
PLACEMENTS, HIGHER STUDIES & ENTREPRENEURSHIP
ITEM
CAY m1
2019 -
2020
CAY m2
2018 -
2019
CAY m3
2017 -
2018
MARKS
Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 46 50 58
40*0.91
=36.40
No. of students placed in companies or
Government Sector (x)
37 46 43
No. of students admitted to higher studies
with valid qualifying scores (GATE or
equivalent State or National Level Tests, GRE,
GMAT etc.) (y)
5 2 6
No. of students turned entrepreneur in
engineering/technology (z)
0 0 1
x +y+z = 42 48 50
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 0.91 0.96 0.86
Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.91
ENGINEERING

36
CRITERION #4
NEWS LETTERS
ENGINEERING

37
CRITERION #4
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY ACTIVITIES
S.No Name of the Professional Societies
No. of Students
Registered
1
IETE
(The Institution of Electronics and
Telecommunication Engineers)
136
2
IAENG
(International Association of Engineers)
100
3
ISTE
(Indian Society for Technical Education)
25
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #4
BALAMURUGAN
2002-2006 BATCH
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
ECQUARIA PVT.LTD -
SINGAPORE
DILJO VARHESE
2003-2007 BATCH
SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER,
ALMOAYYED G
ROUP
BAHRAIN
VENGATESH
2012-2016 BATCH
SENIOR ELECTRICAL
ENGINEER
CHEMPLAST SANMAR LTD
CHENNAI
PRAVEEN K
2002-2006 BATCH
SENIOR BUSINESS ANALYSIS
/PRODUCT MANAGER
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, UK
SILAMBARASAN
2011-2015 BATCH
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER
INFOVIEW TECHNOLOGIES
PVT LTD
CHENNAI
SOWBARNIGA S
2015-2019 BATCH
TEST ENGINEER , TESSOLVE
SEMICONDUCTORS PVT LTD,
GERMANY
ENGINEERING
38

CRITERION #4
SASIKUMAR K
2007-11 BATCH
FIELDS SERVICE ENGINEER ,
SERAC FILLING SYSTEM, UAE
KUTTALA RATNAM S
2008-12 BATCH
ASSOCIATE CONSULTANT,
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICE,
LONDON
BEST JOHNSON
2009-13 BATCH
ELECTRONICS ENGINEER,
QATAR NAVY,
QATAR
SABIN K
2006-10 BATCH
TESTING AND
COMMISSIONING ENGINEER,
SHARJAH ELECTRICITY AND
WATER AUTHORITY, UAE
DINESHKUMAR M
2006-10 BATCH
SENIOR SYSTEM ANALYST,
COMMERCIAL BANK OF
DUBAI, UAE
MALHAL MOHANAN
2004-08 BATCH
TENDER HEAD,
S&T INTERIORS, QATAR,
OMAN
ENGINEERING
39

Faculty Information & Contribution
40
CRITERION #5
STUDENTS FACULTY RATIO
YEAR
CAY
2020 - 2021
CAY m1
2019 - 2020
CAY m2
2018 - 2019
ASSESMENT
U1.1 66 62 62
18
MARKS
U1.2 62 62 61
U1.3 62 61 62
P1.1 18 18 18
P1.2 18 18 18
TOTAL NO. OF STUDENTS IN THE
DEPARTMENT (S)
226 221 221
NO. OF FACULTY IN THE
DEPARTMENT (F)
14 13 13
STUDENT FACULTY RATIO (SFR) 16.14 17 17
AVERAGE SFR 16.71
FACULTY CADRE PROPORTION
YEAR
PROFESSORS ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS ASSISTANT PROFESSORS
ASSESMEN
T
REQUIRED
F1
AVAILABLE
REQUIRED
F2
AVAILABLE
REQUIRED
F3
AVAILABLE
CAY 2020 - 21 1 2 2 3 7 9
22.525
MARKS
CAY M1 2019 - 20 1 0 2 3 7 10
CAY M2 2018 - 19 1 0 2 2 7 11
AVERAGE RF1=1 AF1=0.67 RF2=2 AF2=2.67 RF3=7 AF3=10
V.S.B. ENGINEERING COLLEGE ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
SFR Marks Distribution
< = 15 -- 20 Marks
< = 17 --18 Marks
< = 21 -- 14 Marks
< = 19 -- 16 Marks
< = 23 -- 12 Marks
< = 25 -- 10 Marks
> 25.0 -- 0 Marks

41
CRITERION #5
FACULTY QUALIFICATION
YEARS X Y F
FQ=2.5 X [(10X
+4Y)/F)]
ASSESMENT
CAY 2020 - 21 5 9 11 19.55
16.67
MARKS
CAY M1 2019 -
20
3 10 11 15.91
CAY M2 2018 -
19
2 11 11 14.55
AVERAGE ASSESSMENT 16.67
ENGINEERING
FACULTY RETENTION
DESCRIPTION
CAY
2020 - 21
CAY M1
2019 - 20
NO. OF FACULTY RETAINED 3 6
TOTAL NO. OF FACULTY 13 13
% OF FACULTY RETAINED 23.07 46.15
AVERAGE ASSESSMENT 34.61

CRITERION #5
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
V.S.B. ENGINEERING COLLEGE ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING
42
Teaching Experience: 15 years
Experience in VSBEC: 4 Years
Grants Received: 16.83 LAKHS
No. of Publications: 13
SCIE/Scopus Indexed Journals: 5
Book Published: 07
Patents Published: 04
FDP/STTP Organized : 02
Inter./National Conference Organized : 03
Dr.K.UMAMAHESHWARI M.E., Ph.D.,
Specialization
POWER ELECTROINCS

CRITERION #5
Faculty Profile
ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING
43
Dr.B.SENTHILKUMAR, M.TECH.,
Ph.D.,
Specialization
VLSI DESIGN
Teaching Experience: 20 Years
Experience in VSBEC: 1 . 04 Years
Dr.P.ARULKUMAR M.E., Ph.D.,
Specialization
POWER ELECTRONICS
Teaching Experience: 17 Years
Experience in VSBEC: 1 Years
SCIE/Scopus Indexed
Journals: 4
Dr.I.Kathir., M.E.,Ph.D.,
Specialization
POWER SYSTEM ENGINEERING
Total Experience: 28 years
No. of Inter./National Conference:33
No. of Citations: 18 h-Index: 02
Book Published: 04
FDP/Workshop Organized :06
FDP/Workshop Attended :31

CRITERION #5
ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING
44
Sl.
No.
Faculty Name Designation Qualification Experience
Experience
in VSBEC
1 Mr. R.Sivakumar Assistant Professor M.E.,(Ph.D) 19 Years 15.09 Years
2 Mr. R.Arunkumar Assistant Professor M.Tech. (Ph.D) 11 Years 4 Years
3 Mr. A.Jainulafdeen Assistant Professor M.E. 13 Years 2.08 Years
4 Mr. K.Karthi Assistant Professor
M.E.
3.08 Years 2.08 Years
5 Mr. B. Prasanth Assistant Professor M.E.,(Ph.D) 6.06 years 1.06 Years
6
Mr. B. Prakash
Ayyappan
Assistant Professor M.E.,(Ph.D) 10 Years 1.02 Years
7 Mr.A.Prabaharan Assistant Professor
M.E.
4.06 Years 1 Years
8 Mr.S.Rajesh Assistant Professor
M.E.
6.04 Years 6 months
9
Ms.M.Lavanya
Assistant Professor M.Tech. 4 Years 5 months
Faculty Profile

45
CRITERION #5
FDP / STTPS / TRAINING ACTIVITIES
Name of the Faculty
Max.5 per Faculty
CAYm3
2018 - 2019
CAY m2
2019 - 2020
CAYm1
2020 - 2021
Dr.K.Umamaheswari 3 5 3
Dr.G.Prabhakar 3 5 -
Dr.P.Elamurugan 3 5 -
Dr. B. Senthilkumar 3 - -
Mr. R.Sivakumar 3 3 3
Mr. R.Arunkumar 3 - 3
Mrs.S.Preetha - - 5
Mr. M.Balamurugan - - 3
Mrs.S.Sathiya - - 5
Mr. A.Jainulafdeen 3 - -
Mr. P.Parthasarathy 3 3 -
Mr. S.Ragul - 3 -
Mr. K.Karthi 3 - -
Mr. B. Prasanth 3 - -
Mr. B. Prakash Iyyappan - - -
Mr. C.Maheshkumar - 3 -
Dr.K.Arun - - 3
Mr. M.Iyappan - - 5
Mrs.L.Sreevidya - - 3
Mr. S.Ramachandran - - 3
Mr. K.Guruvaran - - 5
Mr. M. Ramachandran - - 5
Mr. S.Muthu Kumar - - 3
SUM 30 27 49
RF=Number of Faculty [20:1]
Student-Faculty ratio as per 5.1
11.3 11.05 11.05
Assessment =3x(sum/0.5RF)
(Marks limited to 15)
15.92 14.66 26.60
Average assessment over three years (Marks limited to 15) = 15
FACULTY PURSUING Ph.D
 Mr.R.Sivakumar
 Mr.R.Arunkumar
 Mr. B.Prasanth
 Mr.B.Prakash Iyyappan

46
CRITERION #5
FACULTY BOOK PUBLICATIONS
S NO TITLE OF THE BOOKS AUTHORS NAME
1. Basic Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering Dr.K.Umamaheswari
2. Basic Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Dr.K.Umamaheswari
3. Renewable Energy System Dr.K.Umamaheswari
4. Thermo Electric Power Generation using Waste heat energy Dr.K.Umamaheswari
5.
Optimal Power Factor Corrector of Single
Stage Power Converter using BC tuned PID Control
Dr.K.Umamaheswari
6. Hydro power Generation for Domestic Applications Dr.K.Umamaheswari
7. Modern Power Converters Dr.K.Umamaheswari
8. Embedded System Dr.G.Prabhakar
9. Certain Investigations of speed control of DC Drives Dr.G.Prabhakar
10. Mechatronics Dr.G.Prabhakar
11. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems: A fundamental approach Dr.P.Elamurugan
12. Professional Ethics in Engineering Dr.P.Elamurugan
13. Modelling and Analysis of DC chopper controlled PMSG drive Mr. R.Sivakumar
ENGINEERING

47
CRITERION #5
S. NO PROJECT TITLE FUNDING AGENCY AMOUNT
1
International Conference on Network Control,
Computing, Communication with Cyber Security
and Real time implementation of Physical
Systems (ICNCCRPS – 22)
AICTE
F. No.67- 31/ IDC/ GOC/POLICY-2 /
2020-21
(Dated: 21-June,2021)
Rs. 4,00,000
2
MODROB in power electronics and drives
laboratory
AICTE – MODROB
F.No. 9-242 / RIFD/ MOD/ Policy-1/2018-
2019
(Dated: 29-September,2019)
Rs.10,00,000
3
STTP on Futuristic Innovations, Trends in
Renewable Energy and Utilization Technologies
AICTE – STTP
REF. NO. 34-66 / 122 / FDC/STTP/Policy- 1/
2019-20
(Dated: 10-August,2020)
Rs. 2,82,333
4
Design and development of under actuator
aquatic robot to remove oil spills in water based
on the electromagnetic principle
TNSCST students scheme
Lr.No.TNSCST/SPS/AR/ 2017-2018
(Dated: 18-March, 2020)
Rs.7,500
5
Formal Modeling, Control and
real time implementation of
cyber physical systems
AICTE – FDP
Ref. No. 34-67 / 110 /FDC/FDP/P- 1/ 2019-
20
(Dated: 30-July,2020)
Rs.4,34,425
SPONSORED RESEARCH
ENGINEERING

48
CRITERION #5
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
TITLE STUDENTS FACULTY
Arduino Based Autonomous Fire Fighting Robot
Sakthivel T
Sedhupathy S
Sridhar K
Tamilvanan R
Dr.G.Prabhakar,
Associate
Professor/EEE
Warehouse Robot
Gopinath P
Pragalathan E
Praveen Kumar
Vikash Kumar R
Mr.K.Karthi , M.E
Assistant
Professor/EEE
Design and Development of Under-Actuated Aquatic Robot to
remove Oil Spills in Water based on the Electromagnetic Principle
S. Surekha
M.Pavithra
Dr.G.Prabhakar,
Associate
Professor/EEE
Emission Reduction By Using Switched Integrated Rectifier In
Recovery Boiler
Nijandhan R
Surya T
Suresh S
Kavin A
Mr.S.Parthasarat
hy, Assistant
Professor /EEE
Smart LED Light Based On Solar Power Supply
Divakar V.G
Periasamy R
Karthick P
Prasannakumar K.J.V
Mr. K. Karthi,
Assistant
Professor /EEE
IOT Based Intelligent Trolley For Shop Automation
Alagappan P L
Giri Prasath S
Gokulnath S
Santhosh S
M.Balamurugan,
Assistant
Professor /EEE
V.S.B. ENGINEERING COLLEGE ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS

CRITERION #5
49
Arduino Based Autonomous Fire Fighting
Robot
Warehouse Robot
Smart LED Light based on Solar Power Supply
Design And Development Of Under-Actuated Aquati
Robot To Remove Oil Spills In Water Based On
The Electromagnetic Principle
IoT Based Intelligent Trolley for Shop Automation
ENGINEERING

Innovation in Teaching
Learning Process
50
CRITERION #5
S.NO METHODS TOOLS
% OF
PRACTICES
IMPACT
1
Planning of
Course Delivery
through Course
File
Teaching Plan, Assignments,
Subject Activities, CO
assessment, PO attainment
100 CO-PO Assessment and Attainment
2 E Learning
Projectors, Computers,
Pointers, Worksheets, etc.
50
Students Technical Performance, Logical Aptitude, Life Long Learning, Communication
Skills
3
Project Based
Learning
Previous Project Report,
Journals, Computers
100
The Teacher plays the role of Facilitator, working with students to frame worthwhile
questions, Structuring meaningful tasks, Coaching both Knowledge Development &Social
Skills, and carefully assessing about learning the experience
4 NPTEL Courses ICT Tools 30
Student gets relevant and current information as on time. This study will definitely focus
the evaluation of usage and road map for access successfully.
5
Seminars /
Workshops
ICT Tools 100 Enables To Understand The Practical Application. Learning advanced methodologies
6
Skill
Development
Program
Charts, Computer
Peripherals, etc. 100
Clears the fundamentals of students. Students can gain practical knowledge. In spite of
theory concept , various industries also need to know the capacity to complete projects
using specific initiative
7
Industry
Interaction
Industrial Visit, Internships,
Expert Lectures
100
Industrial visits are an important part of learning. And it helps to visualize the items that
need to be measured and that how it is properly placed in real time. Teamwork is also
important at the site that’s where different profession come together to work on Project
8 Expert Lectures ICT Tools 100
The lectures provide a platform for students to clear their doubts, get answer to their
innumerable questions, and even put forth their views on matters relevant to their studies
and their careers
9
Professional
Society Activities
Students Skill oriented
activities
100
Student organizations help strengthen leadership skills.
Joining an organization is one of the best ways to build a bigger network.
Student organizations can be an important part of students’ growth during their college
career.
10 MOUs
Project Assistance, Expert
Lectures, Internships
40
Harnessing the expertise of the persons from the organization for the benefit of students
and staff
ENGINEERING

Project Laboratory
51
CRITERION #5
S.NO. NAME OF THE FACILITY/MAJOR EQUIPMENT COST (INR)
1 ETAP software with 10 user license Rs.2,70,503
2 MATLAB software with 10 user license Rs.1,80.462
3 FPGA Based 3 phase AC Induction Motor Controller Rs.89,484
4 DSP Based BLDC Motor Controller Rs.1,24,748
5 PLC Based 3 phase AC Induction motor Rs.45,936
6 SRM drive using DSP Rs.2,72,940
7 DSP based Chopper fed DC motor Drive Rs.89,368
8
DSP based PWM Inverter closed loop drive for Induction
Motor
Rs.89,368
9 Solar PV Emulator Rs.41,580
10 Micro Wind Energy Generator module Rs.93,555
11
PV based solar power trainer OFF grid and hybrid
inverter system
Rs.93,555
12 1KW Solar PV ON Grid power system Rs.1,50,727
ENGINEERING

Parameters in FPADS
 Teaching Performance
 Supervisory support provided
 Activities organized
 Activities participated
 Papers presented in seminars
 Research Papers published
 Books published
 Monographs, Lab manuals
authored, etc.
 N.S.S. / Sports / Industrial Visits
/ Career Guidance / Counseling
/ Placement Training / Warden
/ HOD Activities
 Achievements /Awards/
Recognition
CRITERION #5
52
S.No Contributions
Marks
Assigned
1 Academic Result and Regularity 35
2 Research & Development 15
3 No. of Projects guided 5
4 Additional Responsibilities 10
5
Accomplishment of Work without
deviations
5
6 Activities organized /Participated 5
7
Achievements / Awards /
Recognition Received
5
8 Institutional Development activities 5
9
Assessment of the Faculty
Performance
10
10 Feedback from Students 5
Total Score 100
ENGINEERING

Faculty Appraisal System
53
CRITERION #5
ENGINEERING

Visiting Faculty
54
CRITERION #5
S.No Academic Year
Name of the Visiting / Adjunct / Emeritus
Faculty
Semester /
Year
Total No.
of Hours
1 2020 - 2021
Mr. Balamurugan D, Senior Project Manager,
Ecquaria Technology Pvt. Ltd., Singapore
EVEN SEM /
II Year 54
2 2019 – 2020
Mr.R.Ravi, Senior Certification Engineer,
Aerospace Domain, Honeywell Technologies
ODD /
III Year 55
3
2018 – 2019 Mr.M.Karthikeyan, Technical Expert, ABB
Industries , Chennai
ODD /
II
Year
53
ENGINEERING

Facilities and Technical Support
CRITERION #6
Sl.No NAME OF THE LABORATORY SIZE
TOTAL
INVESTMENT
1 Electrical Machines Lab
DC Machines Lab:
172.04 Sqr.Mt
AC Machines Lab:
86.2 Sqr.Mt
Rs. 14,48,358/-
2 UG - Power System Simulation Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 10,38,885/-
3 PG - Power System Simulation Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 7,59,056/-
4 Power Electronics Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 7,70,432/-
5 Project Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 6,93,057/-
6 Electrical Engineering Practice Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 3,49,922/-
7 Electric Circuit Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 6,36,024/-
8 Measurement & Instrumentation Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 5,86,995/-
9 Control System Lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 4,33,192/-
10 Renewable Energy system lab 86.2 Sqr.Mt Rs. 4,15,800/-
Total Investment Rs.71,31,721/-
55
ENGINEERING

Facilities and Technical Support
56
CRITERION #6
S.NO
NAME OF THE
TECHNICAL STAFF
LAB INCHARGE QUALIFICATION
1 Mr.Muniyappan V Electrical Machines I and II lab B.Tech EEE
2 Mr.Karthick P Electric Circuits Lab and Power Electronics
Lab
DEEE
3 Ms.Malini K Control and Instrumentation lab and
Renewable Energy System lab
B.E EEE
4 Mr.Mohan Raj D Power System Simulation Lab DEEE
ENGINEERING

Laboratories
CRITERION #6
Electrical Machines Lab
GE 8261-Engineering Practice Laboratory (SEM-II-EEE)
EE8311-Electrical Machines Laboratory-I(III SEM – EEE)
EE8411-Electrical Machines Laboratory-II(IV SEM – EEE)
Total Area: DC -172.04 Sq.mt & AC -86.2 Sq.mt
Total Investment: Rs. 17,98,280/-
Electric Circuits Lab
EE3261 – Electrical circuits Laboratory (II SEM – EEE)
EC8311-Electronics Laboratory(III SEM – EEE)
EE8461-Linear and Digital Integrated Circuits Laboratory( SEM-IV-EEE)
Total Area: 86.2 Sq.mt
57
ENGINEERING

Laboratories
CRITERION #6
Renewable Energy System Lab
Control Systems Lab
EE8511-Control and Instrumentation
Laboratory (V SEM- EEE)
EE8712-Renewable Energy systems
Laboratory (VII SEM- EEE)
58
ENGINEERING

Laboratories
CRITERION #6
Simulation Lab
Power Electronics Lab
EE8661 –Power Electronics and Drives Laboratory – (VI
SEM-EEE)
EE8711 – Power System Simulation Laboratory (VII SEM-
EEE)
EE8811-Project Work( VIII SEM –EEE)
GE8161-Problem Solving and Python Programming
laboratory(I SEM-EEE)
Total Area: Total Area: 86.2 Sq.mt
59
ENGINEERING

Additional Facilities in the
Laboratories
CRITERION #6
Sl.No Facility Name Details
Reason(s) for creating
facility
Areas in which students
are expected to have enhanced learning
Relevance to POs /
PSOs
1
PLC based 3 Phase AC
Induction motor
controller
0.5 HP,415
Volt,1.07Amp,1410 rpm
To have practical
exposure in Special
Electrical Machines and
Electric Drives and
Control
Speed control using PLC based drives
(variable frequency )
POs 1,2,3,5,6,9 & 10
PSOs 1, 2 & 3
2
FPGA based
3 Phase AC Induction
motor controller
1 HP,415
To gain knowledge in
Electric Drives and
Control
Speed control using FPGA Kit (Spartan 6)
and PWM inverter with DSP based closed
loop drive
POs 1,2,3,5,6,9 & 10
PSOs 1, 2, 3
3
DSP based on BLDC
motor controller
1 HP,310 Volt,4.52
Amp,4600 rpm
To practically
understand the motor
controller
Speed control using DSP IC 4011 based
controller
POs 1,2,3,5,6,9 & 10
PSOs 1, 2 & 3
4
DSP based on DC
Shunt Motor
controller
1 HP,180
To do research in
Electric Drives and
Control
Speed control using 3 phase rectifier and
DSP based chopper fed DC Motor drive
POs 1,2,3,5,6,9 & 10
PSOs 1, 2 & 3
5 ETAP software
10 users.
LAN 6 module
For doing academic
projects based on
power system stability
Power system stability, transmission line
-fault Analysis
POs 1,2,3,4,5,6,9 &
10
PSOs 1, 2 & 3
6 MATLAB software
MATLAB 7.11 (2011a)
Simulink control
systems tool box, Signal
processing tool box.5
Users
To prepare the students
for simulation academic
projects.
System modeling in Power system and
power electronics and control systems
areas.
POs 1,2,3,4,5,6,9 &
10
PSOs 1, 2 & 3
7 Emulator Software
PV and Wind Emulator
tool boxes
To understand the
Solar and Wind power
generations academic
project.
Simulation and modeling in renewable
energy systems
POs 1,2,3,4,5,6,9 &
10
PSOs 1, 2 & 3
60
ENGINEERING

Overall Maintenance & Safety
CRITERION #6
 All the laboratories are well equipped and well maintained. Instruments are kept in working
condition.
 Laboratory equipments are calibrated regularly to ensure the standard
 Minor repairs are done by the faculty members & lab technicians and major repairs are
outsourced.
 Periodic & preventive maintenance schedule is followed to maintain the working condition of the
equipment and a separate maintenance register is available in each laboratory.
 All laboratories are fully furnished with tables and chairs to benefit the needs of the students.
 The laboratories and the space are sufficient for students to perform the experiments without
congestion.
 Individual equipment allotted for the student to do the lab work.
 All power cables are properly insulated & laid away to prevent electric shock and power
interruptions.
 For maintaining the overall good ambience, daily and weekly cleaning of equipment are carried
out with regular inspection by Lab-in-charges and HoD.
 For simulation lab Firewall is installed to limit and block unnecessary activities.
61
ENGINEERING

Research Laboratories
62
CRITERION #6
S.NO. NAME OF THE FACILITY/MAJOR EQUIPMENT COST (INR)
1 LENOVO THINKCENTRE DESKTOP M720 SFF
Rs. 6,93,057/-
2 LENOVO 19.5” LED MONITOR E2064
3 WINDOWS 8
4 EPSON - PROJECTOR
5 CANON - PRINTER / SCANNER
6 FPGA based controllers
7 DSP based controllers
8 MATLAB,ETAP and Xilinx software tools
 To promote R&D activity in newly emerging challenges in science, technology and engineering.
 To initiate and engage programs and projects related to R&D activity.
 Provide research exposure for students during their studies.
 Signing of MOU with industries and institutes for industry orient training.
 Sponsoring faculty members to attend conferences, seminars, workshop etc
 Motivating the students to publish research papers in journals/conferences
ENGINEERING

CRITERION #7
Attainment 2.21 2.02 1.90 1.78 1.86 1.75 1.83 1.87 2.23 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.04 1.80 1.94
Target 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80
ACADEMIC YEAR: 2020 - 2021
ACTION TAKEN PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Additional
Experiments
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Tutorial Sessions ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Industrial Visits ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Internships / In
plant Training
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Technical Events ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Guest Lectures ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Work Shops ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Value Added
Courses
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Peer Learning ✓ ✓ ✓
Seminars ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Projects ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Group Discussion ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 63
ENGINEERING

 Guest lectures
 Seminars
 Mini Projects
 Industrial projects
 Industrial visits
 Projects
 Literature surveys
 Assignments
 Co curricular activities
 Content beyond syllabus
 Demonstration classes
 Remedial classes
 Tutorial hours
 In-plant training
 Value added courses
 NSS activities
 Motivational sessions
 Training for communication
 Training on modern tools like
MATLAB, ETAP
 MOCK interviews & Placement
training
CRITERION #7
64
ENGINEERING

ISO 9001 : 2015 Audit - TUV Rhineland (India) Private Limited
ISO 9001: 2015 AUDIT
 Internal Audit
 External Audit
FREQUENCY OF AUDIT:
 Internal Audit- IQAC
Twice in an academic year
 Certification Audit- ISO
Once in three academic years
 Surveillance Audit – ISO
Once in an academic year
AUDIT EFFECTIVENESS :
Monitoring and Rectification of
deviations to provide qualified
engineers
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
 Monitoring Syllabus Coverage
 Adherence to academic calendar
 Maintaining Lecture Notes & Log
Book
 Quality Control of Internal
Assessment Test
 Conducting Value Added Courses
 Student Centric Activities
 Mentoring System, Remedial
/Coaching classes
 Class Committee Meetings and
Follow Up
 Result Analysis
 Library, Laboratories and Internet
Facilities
 Budget and Utilization
CRITERION #7
65
ENGINEERING

Academic Year
Number of
companies
visited
Number of offers
received
Total number of
students enrolled
for Placement
Number of
students placed
%. of students
placed
2020-2021 28 123 46 44 95.65%
2019-2020 27 96 41 37 90.24%
2018-2019 34 112 48 46 95.83%
Academic Year 2020-2021 2019-2020 2018-2019
No. of Students Progressing
to Higher Education
5 2 6
Continuous Improvement in Placement & Higher Studies CRITERION #7
66
ENGINEERING

Item
CAY
(2020-21)
CAYm1
(2019-20)
CAYm2
(2018-19)
State/University/ Level
Entrance No
Examination/ Others
No of Students
Admitted
52 52 45
Opening
Score/Rank
183.5 178 191
Closing
Score/Rank
80 80 96.75
Name of the Entrance
Examination for Lateral
Entry Or Lateral Entry
Details
No of Students
Admitted
11 6 2
Opening
Score/Rank
99 82 82
Closing
Score/Rank
66 75.07 77
Average Board Result of admitted students
(Physics, Chemistry & Maths)
122.07 136.26 151.74
CRITERION #7
67
ENGINEERING

68
Part II
OBE Philosophy of the Department
ENGINEERING

5 D’s of OBE
 Define Outcome
 Design Curriculum
 Deliver Instruction
 Document Result
 Determine Advancement
Outcomes:
What knowledge, skill and behavior a
graduate is expected to attain upon just
completion of a program and after 4
Years of graduation.
V.S.B. ENGINEERING COLLEGE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 69

OBE Framework

The OBE Process and Implementation

Practice on OBE
5 Questions for Instructional Design
 What do you want the student to be able to do? (Outcome)
 What does the student need to know in order to do this well? (Curriculum)
 What activity will facilitate the learning? (Pedagogy - learning & teaching)
 How will the student demonstrate the learning? (Assessment)
 How will the teacher know the student has done this well? (Criteria)

Bloom’s Taxonomy
Level 1 List / Define / What
Level 2 Explain / Describe
Level 3
Calculate /
Construct / Apply
Level 4 Analyze / Apply
Level 5 Justify / Evaluate
Level 6 Create

Course Outcome / Program Specific
Outcomes Mapping (Sample)
CRITERION #3
74
COURSE OUTCOMES
C204 – ELECTRICAL MACHINES I– II YEAR EEE – III SEMESTER – ODD
C204.1
Summarize the concepts of magnetic circuits and properties of magnetic
materials.
C204.2 Analyze the performance, testing and parallel operation of transformers.
C204.3 Describe the concepts of electro mechanical energy conversion
C204.4 Learn the principle, characteristics and methods of excitation of DC generators.
C204.5 Learn the principle, characteristics and methods of excitation of DC motors.
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C204.1 2 2 3 - - - - - - - 2 - 3 1 2
C204.2 3 3 2 2 - 1 - - - - - - 2 1 3
C204.3 2 2 2 - - - - - - - - 2 2 1 3
C204.4 3 3 2 - - 2 - - - - 2 - 2 1 3
C204.5 3 3 2 2 - 2 - - - - 2 2 3 1 3
AVG 2.6 2.6 2.2 2 - 1.7 - - - - 2 2 2.4 1 2.8
ENGINEERING

75
Assessment Process for COs
ENGINEERING

Improving the Quality
76
CRITERION #3
ASSESSMENT
TYPE
ASSESSMENT TOOL DECISION CRITERIA
DATA
COLLECTION
FREQUENCY
DIRECT
(80%)
University Examination
Attainment Level 1:
< 50%of students scoring more
than Class Average.
Attainment Level 2:
50% - 60%of students scoring more
than Class Average.
Attainment Level 3:
>60%of students scoring more than
Class Average.
Once in every
Semester
1.Internal Assessment Test
Thrice in every
semester
2.Assignment
Once in every
semester
3.Model Practical Examination
4.Project Reviews Final semester
INDIRECT
(20%)
Alumni Survey Yearly Once
Employer Survey Yearly Once
Student Exit Survey
End of the
Program
Parents Feedback Yearly Once
ENGINEERING

77
Assessment Process for COs –
Electrical Machines-I
S.No. REG.NO
NAME OF THE
STUDENT
CO1 CO2 CO2 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO5 CO5
OVERALL
COS
UNIVERSITY
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
AVERAGE
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ASSIGNMENT
AVERAGE
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
UNIVERSITY
GRADE
GRADE
TO
GRADE
POINTS
1 922519105001 AABAVANAN B 72.7 58.8 58.8 58.8 76.5 63.6 60.6 96 78.3 66 A 8
2 922519105002
ABDUL KALAM
E
84.8 76.5 77.4 76.9 78.3 55.0 89.5 93 91.2 77 A+ 9
3 922519105003 ARUN B 63.6 52.9 0.0 26.5 83.3 25.0 0.0 93 46.5 38 A 8
4 922519105005
BHARANITHAR
AN N
71.2 64.7 61.3 63.0 100.0 68.2 68.4 97 82.7 70 A 8
5 922519105006 BHARATH M 72.7 94.1 76.5 85.3 82.4 66.7 90.9 90 90.5 80 A 8
6 922519105007
DEEBA
HARSHINI S
72.7 58.8 58.8 58.8 76.5 63.6 60.6 96 78.3 66 A 8
…
ENGINEERING

78
Assessment Process for COs –
Electrical Machines-I
PARAMETERS
CO1 CO2 CO2 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO5 CO5
OVERALL
COS
UNIVERSITY
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
AVERAGE
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
ASSIGNMENT
AVERAGE
MARK
(100)
ATTAINMENT
MARK
(100)
UNIVERSITY
GRADE
GRADE
TO
GRADE
POINTS
AVERAGE 73.22 76.46 66.54 71.50 77.87 65.31 71.19 93.69 82.44 72.79 8.16
NO.OF STUDENTS SCORED
MORE THAN AVERAGE/ PASS
IN UNIVERSITY
22 33 33 32 32 30 39 32 35 32 19
% STUDENTS SCORED
MORE THAN AVERAGE/ PASS
IN UNIVERSITY
37.93 56.90 56.90 55.17 55.17 51.72 67.24 55.17 60.34 55.17 32.76
LEVEL OF ATTAINMENT 1 2 2 2 3 3 1
CO ATTAINMENT THROUGH
INTERNAL (20%)
0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6
CO ATTAINMENT
UNIVERSITY (80%)
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
DIRECT CO ATTAINMENT 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4
ENGINEERING

79
Assessment Process for
COs – POs / PSOs :Control Electrical Machines-I
Course
Outcome
CO
Attainment
(
%)
PO
1
PO
2
PO3
PO
4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
PSO1
PSO2
PSO3
CO1 1.00 0.67 0.67 1.00 - - - - - - - 0.67 - 1.00 0.33 0.67
CO2 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 - 0.33 - - - - - - 0.67 0.33 1.00
CO3 1.20 0.80 0.80 0.80 - - - - - - - - 0.80 0.80 0.40 1.20
CO4 1.20 1.40 1.40 0.93 - - 0.93 - - - - 0.93 - 0.93 0.47 1.40
CO5 1.40 1.40 1.40 0.93 0.93 - 0.93 - - - - 0.93 0.93 1.40 0.47 1.40
CO AVG 1.05 1.05 0.87 0.80 - 0.73 - - - - 0.84 0.87 0.96 0.40 1.13
ENGINEERING

80
CRITERION #3
ENGINEERING

81
CRITERION #3
ENGINEERING

Total PO / PSO Attainment
Calculation for AY: 2020 - 2021
82
CRITERION #3
S.
No.
Assessment
Types
Courses
/Activities
Contributing to
PO
PO
1
PO
2
PO
3
PO
4
PO
5
PO
6
PO
7
PO
8
PO
9
PO
10
PO
11
PO
12
PSO
1
PSO
2
PSO3
1 D Courses 1.85 1.57 1.34 1.18 1.34 1.11 1.09 1.23 1.73 1.59 1.28 1.20 1.37 1.16 1.28
2 D
Project Viva Voce
Assessment
2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80
3 D
Co-Curricular and
Extra Co-
Curricular
- - - - - 1.16 1.70 1.50 2.20 1.50 1.12 1.25 2.00 1.25 1.87
4 ID Exit Survey 2.95 2.9 2.97 2.92 2.85 2.92 2.87 2.79 2.85 3 2.9 2.92 2.92 2.9 2.79
5 ID Alumni Survey 3 2.88 2.92 2.8 2.76 2.8 2.68 2.84 2.92 2.96 2.84 2.88 2.88 2.84 2.68
6 ID Employer Survey 1.92 1.92 1.92 2.04 1.8 1.92 1.8 2.04 2.04 1.8 1.92 2.04 2.04 2.15 1.94
7 ID Parent’s Survey 2.93 2.79 2.86 2.43 2.57 2.64 2.43 2.71 2.86 2.93 2.71 2.79 2.79 2.71 2.43
ENGINEERING

PO (1-5)Attainment
AY: 2020 - 2021
83
CRITERION #3
S. NO.
ASSESSMENT
TYPES
COURSES / ACTIVITIES
CONTRIBUTING TO PO
ASSESSMENT
WEIGHTAGE
PO 1 PO 2 PO 3 PO 4 PO 5
1 D Courses 60% 1.11 0.94 0.80 0.71 0.81
2 D
Project Viva Voce
Assessment
20% 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56
3 ID Exit Survey 5% 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14
4 ID Alumni Survey 5% 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14
5 ID Employer Survey 5% 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09
6 ID Parent’s Survey 5% 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.13
Overall PO Attainment (On a scale of 3) 2.21 2.02 1.90 1.78 1.86
ENGINEERING

PO (6-12) & PSO (1-3) Attainment
AY: 2020 - 2021
84
CRITERION #3
S. NO.
ASSESSMENT
TYPES
COURSES /ACTIVITIES
CONTRIBUTING TO PO
ASSESSMENT
WEIGHTAGE
PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
1 D Courses 40% 0.44 0.44 0.49 0.69 0.64 0.51 0.48 0.55 0.46 0.51
2 D
Project Viva Voce
Assessment
20% 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56
3 D
Co-Curricular and
Extra Co-Curricular
20% 0.23 0.34 0.30 0.44 0.30 0.23 0.25 0.40 0.25 0.38
4 ID Exit Survey 5% 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14
5 ID Alumni Survey 5% 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13
6 ID Employer Survey 5% 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10
7 ID Parent’s Survey 5% 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12
Overall PO Attainment (On a scale of 3) 1.75 1.83 1.87 2.23 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.04 1.80 1.94
ENGINEERING

PO / PSO Attainment
85
CRITERION #7
ATTAINMENT 2.21 2.02 1.90 1.78 1.86 1.75 1.83 1.87 2.23 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.04 1.80 1.94
TARGET 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1
ACTION TAKEN PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Additional
Experiments
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Tutorial Sessions ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Industrial Visits ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Internships / In
plant Training
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Technical Events ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Guest Lectures ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Work Shops ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Value Added
Courses
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Peer Learning ✓ ✓ ✓
Seminars ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Projects ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Group Discussion ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

PO / PSO Attainment - Improvement
86
CRITERION #7
ATTAINMENT 2.21 2.02 1.90 1.78 1.86 1.75 1.83 1.87 2.23 2.03 1.82 1.82 2.04 1.80 1.94
TARGET 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1
ENGINEERING

ENGINEERING

EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx

Similaire à EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

EEE_NBA- 10.03.202tdgxhfstsugugjdtatdigigudydugig2_Final.pptx