The document discusses the potential benefits of opening government data including: 1) More informed policy debates based on facts rather than rhetoric. 2) Consensus building and better legislation through greater transparency. 3) Optimizing program efficiency and reducing costs through new perspectives from public involvement.

1. Fra Open Data tilLinkedOpen Data Stian Danenbarger <@stidan> Bouvet ASA <stian@bouvet.no>

7. 47 nye anvendbare tjenester...

8. Totalkostnad USD 50k (20k i premier)

10. “A hierarchy of database journalism” Level 5: Data experiences and storytelling Level 4: Data visualization Level 3: Data exploration Level of ambition Level 2: Data search Level 1: Data delivery "If we can find enough of these things that intersect with the lives of our readers, I think we will be all right.“ − Dennis Ryerson, Editor, “the Indianapolis Star” Basert på Rich Gordon: “Data as journalism, journalism as data” (2007)

11. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT, Brussels, 7.5.2009 onthere-useof Public SectorInformation – ReviewofDirective 2003/98/EC –

16. Offentlige Norge: ”Tjenestetrappa”

18. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/ict-ent-net/isg-report-4-0-erratum_en.pdf

21. “If we let the computer do the job and stop worrying about the operations executed inside the black box, this may imply an ever-greater decrease in our knowledge and insight on how the public sector in society works with regard, for example, to distribution and re-distribution of money between the different layers in the community. Moreover, we will be more and more helpless if we try to examine the correctness of government decisions concerning our lives and welfare. Such a situation would affect the very relationship between government and its' citizens in a democratic society under the rule of law, namely, the capability of citizens to participate in the decision-making and control of dispositions by government authorities. The many at the bottom may have greater problems than before in controlling the few at the top.” “Transparent computer systems - transparent government“, D. W. Schartum (1995)

22. Skiftende paradigmer? Desentralisert og emergent Fokus: Prosesserbar informasjon Data: Delte identifikatorer (URI), selvbeskrivende hypermedia-formater over HTTP Komponent-basert Fokus: Tjenester Data: XML, åpne skjema, namespaces Objekt-orientert Fokus: Struktur Data: Databaser med proprietære skjema, tekst Prosedyre-orientert Fokus: Syntaks Data: Internt i applikasjoner 1995 1975 2005 2015 1985 1965

23. Tom Coates, Yahoo: ”The web as it was”…

24. Tom Coates, Yahoo: ”Web of the future?”

25. Samhandling krever delte definisjoner – og delte identifikatorer for disse Gjelder ikke bare entiteter – også relasjoner og føringer Eksempel: Skole, skoleeier – og relasjonene mellom Fag, eksamen, skole – og relasjonene mellom Når flere løsninger skal spille sammen, må identifikatorene løftes ut av de lokale systemene

29. Utdanningsdirektoratets Grep:Delt datamodell med forskriftsstatus for grunnutdanningen Oppdateringer Resultater Definisjoner Formidling/annotering Spørring/abonnement

31. Tilrettelegge

32. Skape muligheterLokale læreplaner Ressurser fra private aktører Ressurser fra Skolenettet Materiale funnet eller laget av lærere Kompetansemål Materiale funnet eller laget av elever Hovedområder Fag Visjonen er der, byggeklossene også…

34. Notifikasjon

35. Indeksering

36. Aggregering

37. “Discovery”

38. “Trust metrics”

39. Filtrering

41. Sammenstille

42. Dele

43. TilgjengeliggjøreIndeks

46. “[…] regardless of what may be regarded as a true service-orientation, we should avoid employing computerized systems in a way that reduces the number of citizens who are actively participating in legal decision-making processes, concerning him- or herself, and in democratic debates. […] Here, when I talk about transparency, I am not primarily thinking of the insight represented by thin layers of pleasant simplifications, in the shape of glossy brochures. Instead, I wish to give attention to the problem of communicating knowledge concerning the very bedrock of legal and administrative complexity. […] Our society is not based on freedom and justice because this is the most cost-efficient way to construct a society” “Transparent computer systems - transparent government“, D. W. Schartum (1995)