In this presentation we talk about novel techniques we employed in using eye tracking glasses in our field research. Our client wanted to better understand the needs of visitors and how effective the layout of Tourist Information Centre is in answering those needs. Eye tracking was employed to help understand how visitors to Information Centre engage with it, which sections of the literature and merchandise shelving were looked at the most and whether the signage in the centre was noticed. We asked visitors to wear eye-tracking glasses and to use the centre to accomplish the goals of their visit. Findings allowed the client to both take remedial action in areas where the experience was not as effective as it could be, and to take advantage of the insight to maximise the revenue potential of various areas of the centre.
Eye-tracking Glasses Help Define Shop Layout and Record Visitor Experiences - UX Lisbon 2013
1. Anna Basista
UX Consultant
User Vision
Anna Basista
UX Consultant
Eye tracking glasses
help define shop layout and
record visitors’ experience
2. What is eye tracking?
Measurement of eye activity
Where and how people look
What is and what isn’t seen
What is the pattern for a group of
users
3. Eye tracking glasses
Capture user behaviour and eye
gaze in real environments
Where and how people look
Analysis of real world user journeys
Improvement of the effectiveness,
engagement or clarity of the given
interaction
4. Eye tracking with markers
Way to capture user eye gaze in real
environments
Automatic quantitative analysis (AOI’s)
Markers communicate with sensor
located in the glasses
Data from multiple participants can be
aggregated and overlaid on a still
image
5. Method
• Photo of shane here.
What can we do with
these glasses in the
real environments?
6. How successful visitors are in achieving their goals of the visit?
What prevents visitors from finding everything they want?
How effective signage is?
How visitors engage with leaflets racks and retail products?
Which parts of the information centre have the heaviest
footfall and which areas are least often visited?
Objectives
7. “What is the goal of your
visit to the information
centre?”
Our approach
8. “Browse for leaflets
and inspiration”.
“Find information
about trips,
places,
entertainment...”
“Find out
what is worth
seeing in
Edinburgh”.
“Get maps.”
Goals
23. Using eye tracking glasses in the field
Very easy to set up and start using
Users feel comfortable using them
Permission is needed – the glasses
are not that discreet
The battery in the recording
device can drain quickly
24. Using eye tracking glasses in the field
Crucial for calibration purposes
Allow you to mark out AOI’s
Required for aggregated
gaze trails and heatmaps
Speed up the analysis process
May not be feasible to set-up
You may need a lot of blue tack!
25. Using eye tracking glasses
Manual analysis can be time
consuming, but it is worthwhile
with well defined objectives
Automatic analysis is really great!
Recordings of the user journeys
are loved by the clients
AOI’s analysis in videos available
without markers
26. How comfortable was it for you the
wear eye-tracking glasses?
Very
comfortable
Quite
comfortable
Didn’t really
notice/can’t
say
Quite
uncomfortable
Very
uncomfortable
27. Not at all
concerned
Hardly noticed Somewhat Quite a bit
Very much
concerned
How concerned did you feel about
wearing “these” glasses in public?
28. • In this Lightning Talk we would like to talk about novel techniques we employed in this project
but also we are eager to share our experiences with using eye tracking glasses in the field
research. Our client wanted to better understand the needs of visitors and how effective the
layout of Tourist Information Centre is in answering those needs. Eye tracking was employed to
help understand how visitors to Information Centre engage with it, which sections of the
literature and merchandise shelving were looked at the most and whether the signage in the
centre was noticed. 15 visitors to the centre were recruited to take part in the study, all
intercepted as they entered the centre. We asked them to wear eye-tracking glasses and to use
the centre to accomplish the goals of their visit. The ability to record these user journeys without
constantly observing test participants was especially effective as it helped to make the whole
testing session feel more realistic and avoided disturbing participants in any way. Data gathered
from eye tracking glasses was imported into dedicated software package and analysed.
Automatic analysis was performed on the demarked shelving. Manual coding analysis was also
performed, focusing specifically on the amount of time participants spent looking at signage,
advertising posters and retail shelves. The amount of and duration of these gazes were calculated
in relation to total participants’ visit time. Based on the visitors’ journey recordings gathered with
eye tracking glasses a ‘footfall heat map’ was created. Each time a person went to the particular
area of the centre this occurrence was recorded and later mapped out in a form of a ‘heat map’
based on the frequency of visits. This helped our client understand where visitors go throughout
their visit and which of the Information Centre’s areas receive more or less footfall. Findings
allowed the client to both take remedial action in areas where the experience was not as
effective as it could be, and to take advantage of the insight to maximise the revenue potential of
various areas of the centre.
Get in touch!
Anna Basista
User Experience Consultant
User Vision
55 North Castle Street
Edinburgh
EH2 3QA
Email: anna@uservision.co.uk
Web: www.uservision.co.uk
The analysis of this part of the centre was a high priority All visitors had at least 10 seconds viewing time of the rack at approx. 1m distance either throughout their true intent visit or dedicated time at the end of testing if they have not visited rack beforeFindings should be reviewed with caution , as in some instances someone would be standing in a field of view covering leaflets rack. Such approach makes this observation more realistic.
The analysis of this part of the centre was a high priority All visitors had at least 10 seconds viewing time of the rack at approx. 1m distance either throughout their true intent visit or dedicated time at the end of testing if they have not visited rack beforeFindings should be reviewed with caution , as in some instances someone would be standing in a field of view covering leaflets rack. Such approach makes this observation more realistic.