Contenu connexe
Similaire à Moore's Law and The FUTURE of Health Care
Similaire à Moore's Law and The FUTURE of Health Care (20)
Plus de Wayne Caswell (6)
Moore's Law and The FUTURE of Health Care
- 1. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 1
Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care
By Wayne Caswell, founder of Modern Health Talk
This article examines a future driven by Moore’s Law and the trend of circuits and components getting
smaller, faster and cheaper exponentially over time and the eventual blending of science and
technology (INFO + BIO + NANO + NEURO). I approach this topic from the unique perspective of an IBM
technologist, market strategist, futurist, and consumer advocate. See About the Author and About
Modern Health, below, to better understand what shaped this view of the future.
Which Future?
Futurists regularly consider alternative scenarios and
examine factors that can steer the future in one
direction or another. That way, clients can select a
preferred version of the future and know what they
might do to make that future happen.
It’s relatively easy to extrapolate past trends, assuming
that nothing prevents those trends from continuing at
the same rate, but will they? One can also look at what’s
possible by tracking research lab activity and then estimating how long it will take to bring those new
technologies to market.
But a potentially better approach is to start with a solid understanding of market NEEDS and what drives
the development of solutions for them, or factors that inhibit solutions. Changes in politics and public
policy, for example, can be a huge driver, with Obamacare as an example, or a huge inhibitor. That’s why
I’m so interested in various healthcare reforms that accompany tech innovation.
Demographics
Let’s start with NEED as a driver of our healthcare future.
World population more than doubled in the 65 years I’ve been on the planet, from about 2.5 billion to
now over 7 billion, and even though we live some 30 years longer, we’re generally less healthy. That’s
largely because of technology, including electricity that allows us to work on computers in office
buildings and under artificial lights. Those lights cause us to stay up later at night and interfere with our
natural circadian rhythms. And the increased stress and lack of restorative sleep (1/3 get less than 6
hours/night when they should be getting 7-9) causes all sorts of health problems that seem to get worse
as we age or gain weight.
Medical professionals tell us that 75% of healthcare costs go to treating chronic diseases that are largely
preventable, but many of our lifestyle choices are influenced by technology. Modern architecture and
transportation systems, for example, have given us easy access to food whenever we want it.
- 2. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 2
In ancient hunter-gatherer days, we might not know when we’d make another kill and eat again, so
we’re genetically predisposed to eating all that’s on our plate. Our DNA has not evolved as fast as
technology, so our bodies still drive us to over eat in order to store energy in case of famine. This, the
lack of restorative sleep, and other factors have contributed to a population with two-thirds of adults
who are overweight or obese and one third who are obese. That obesity also affects our health and
contributes to rising healthcare costs.
Most other industrialized nations provide universal healthcare, but Americans rely instead on private
health insurance and a for-profit system that views patients as paying customers. That system works
hard to keep us coming back, treating symptoms without much regard for wellness and prevention,
since that would avoid the need for medical care in the first place.
Americans spend over $2.7 trillion/year on medical care, an amount projected to reach $4.2 trillion by
2020 (or about 20% of GDP). We already spend more than twice as much as other nations in the OECD,
but even with all that, we still don’t have better care. As a nation we live sicker and die younger,
according to the World Health Organization.
That’s the starting point.
Next look at the 10,000 baby
boomers reaching age 65 every day
and the impact this aging
population will have on future
healthcare costs and our delivery
system. We’ll soon have a major
shortfall in the number of doctors
and nurses to offer care, as well as
a shortage of young workers to
drive the economy and help pay for
care.
Then there are advancements in
genetic research that may soon conquer most inherited diseases, as well as therapies that repair cell
damage before it accumulates. These developments will dramatically extend longevity and may one day
allow people to live for a thousand years, futurists say. But at what cost?
Governments at federal, state and local levels are not ready for the coming demands on the healthcare
system. Neither are the unpaid family caretakers who already spend more time caring for elderly or
disable loved ones than their own children, taking time off from work, sacrificing promotions, and
impacting their own health. The AARP puts the annual cost burden of these unpaid caretakers at over
$480 billion per year, which is more than the $361B in Medicaid spending, and nearly as much as the
$509B in Medicare spending. It will just get worse without effective tools to help.
- 3. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 3
Technology as an Enabler
Applied appropriately, technology can
provide just the right tools to help us
cope with the aging population and
increasing healthcare costs. It must.
But public policies much change too,
and embrace tech-enabled change.
Fortunately, the pace of tech
innovation accelerates exponentially
with Moore’s Law.
I often compare today’s smartphones
with one of the mainframe computers
I worked on in the mid-1970s. The
IBM System/370 Model 158-3
became a common performance benchmark, because it could execute 1 million instructions per second
(MIPS). This $3.5 million computer was so expensive it was shared by hundreds or thousands of people.
Just ten years later they all had personal computers, and each one cost 1,000 times less.
Now back to the smartphone comparison. Where that IBM mainframe was fast (1 MIPS), even the older
generation Apple iPhone 4 was rated at 5,000 MIPS – i.e. 5,000 times faster than the million dollar
mainframe that required a large computer room, liquid cooling, and special air conditioning. And rather
than share, you carry the smartphone in your pocket everywhere you go, with the ability to sync with
medical sensor devices and do Anywhere/Anytime video calls with your doctor. But with real-time
monitoring of sensor data, you’ll soon have medical care Everywhere/AllTheTime.
Technology keeps getting faster, cheaper and smaller, and it’s now being embedded into everyday
devices, including light bulbs, doorknobs, your clothing, and your toothbrush. For at least 5 years I’ve
used a Philips Sonicare toothbrush that has an embedded microprocessor chip that’s so small and
inexpensive that Philips couldn’t find a cheaper one. What I find interesting is that the processor in my
toothbrush is 10 times faster than the $3.5 million IBM mainframe I worked on – my Toothbrush!
What’s next for processors and sensors?
We’ll find them in everything with a digital heartbeat, powered by electricity or not. The Philips Hue, for
example, is an energy saving LED light bulb that can talk to your smartphone. Because it needs some
simple electronics to convert AC current to DC, Philips added a computer chip and support for a Wi-Fi
home network. As a result, you can use your smartphone to turn the light on or off, make it bright or
dim, and even change its color temperature from cool blue to warm orange, which is better for
nighttime and interferes less with sleep patterns.
Sensors have been used in automated homes for years, but mostly in high-end homes with professional
installation, or in DIY systems cobbled together by hobbyists. With wireless networks and smarter
- 4. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 4
technologies like the NEST thermostat, these sensors will gradually become mainstream – very gradually
in my opinion.
As “smart” as the NEST is, it doesn’t know if I’m feeling hot because I just finished exercising or cold
because I just ate ice cream. But if NEST could connect to wearable devices that sense skin temperature,
it might.
I think sensors for medical
applications will become mainstream
faster than for smart homes, because
there’s more of a need. And they’ll
monitor more things. Beyond motion,
light, temperature, moisture and gas;
medical sensors will also monitor
pressure, chemicals and biomarkers.
Doctors will then be able to
determine how well a drug is being
metabolized and adjust the dosage
and frequency accordingly.
The sensors can be in a watch you
wear, on a patch on the skin,
implanted under the skin, or even swallowed as part of a pill.
Nano Scale & Macro Scale
Consider extrapolations of Moore’s
Law – where technology keeps
getting cheaper, faster and smaller
and information science (processors
& networks) converges with cognitive
& neuroscience (neuron signaling)
and biology (chemistry, genes &
proteins).
As small computer processors shrink
to the size of a cell or smaller,
futurists believe they’ll communicate
with neurons directly. Nano-scale
robots could be injected into the
blood stream to seek out and destroy
cancer cells. And “smart” drug delivery could deposit medications exactly where they are needed and
nowhere else. But this raises new security concerns and the need for body firewalls to prevent our
medical sensors from being hacked.
- 5. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 5
Moore’s Law also affects the
performance of powerful
supercomputers like IBM’s Watson,
which is now being applied to medical
diagnostics and other healthcare
tasks. Watson is significant because it
understands nuances of the English
language and includes the artificial
intelligence ability to Learn. Watson is
also fast – real fast. IBM
demonstrated its ability to read and
analyze the equivalent of 300 million
books in less than 3 seconds during a
widely publicized game of Jeopardy,
where Watson competed against the
all time top money-winner and the guy who won the most games. Watson won.
For perspective, if those 300 million books were stacked along a very long bookshelf, it would cover the
equivalent of 7 football fields. Keep in mind that technologies that first appear in million dollar
supercomputers will eventually move down-market to consumer products. The iPhone’s SIRI speech
recognition software is an example since it already understands much of the English language and can
carry on simple conversations. It’s not as fast as Watson yet, but watch this space.
Smartphones and tablets already serve as health gateways between sensor data and powerful cloud-
based services that monitor, store and analyze that data as needed. But over time more of the storage
and analysis of this sensor data will occur in the mobile device itself.
Healthcare Gets Personalized & Personal
Powerful supercomputers like Watson will lead the way toward personalized medicine, doing the
analytics of “big data” and helping physicians diagnose problems and personalize the medications and
care plans based on a huge global knowledgebase of medical information, a repository that’s doubling in
size every 5 years. Such personalization will also consider the patient’s own medical record info, DNA,
and monitored sensor data.
Remote access to Watson can be extended beyond doctors and will then trickle down the chain from
specialists to general practitioners, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, RNs, LVNs, medical aids &
techs, and eventually to consumers themselves. This will accelerate the current trend of patients taking
more responsibility for their own health and scouring online websites (e.g. WebMD and PatientsLikeMe)
for medical information about their own conditions. After all, they have more skin in the game than
their physician, just not as much formal medical training.
- 6. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 6
Telehealth & Telemedicine
Some patients are already connecting
with practitioners through high-def
video calls from retail clinics or kiosks,
from their home PCs (using software
like Skype), or through their
smartphone or tablet computer. It’s
called telehealth, and new services are
springing up to support it.
Your specialist and general practitioner
may be miles away, but you can see
and talk with them remotely; and with
a few medical sensors (blood pressure
cuff, digital stethoscope, medical
imaging attachment), they can do remote exams too. If you don’t have the skills or tools, a nurse or aid
can come to your home or workplace connect you all in a video conference with the remote expert(s).
As this trend continues, regulators must adapt and figure out how to handle licensing and oversight
across state lines or international borders. Traditional States Rights will be challenged as our world
becomes increasingly mobile and connected and where we change jobs and careers every few years and
move about to exploit new opportunities. If we want to keep our health provider, how will that happen
if she lives, and is licensed to practice, in another state?
Healthcare Robots
What if the person providing personal
care at home is not a person at all but
a robot instead? Japan, with its One
Child per Family policy, faces a much
more significant aging problem than
we do, and they’re turning to
healthcare robots for help. Japan is
pioneering the early development of
healthcare robots and hopes to have a
robot in every senior’s home by 2015.
That’s just 2 years from now. South
Korea also faces an aging issue, as
does most of the globe, and they’ve
mandated a robot in every home by 2020.
- 7. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 7
They do this because robots can easily do repetitive tasks, or ones that are too dangerous or difficult for
humans. They can easily lift and transfer heavy patients, but their strong arms lack sensitivity today.
That will be fixed with improved sensors.
What’s especially attractive about robots is that they can work 24x7 without complaining about low
wages or the lack of benefits; and while they’re expensive to buy now, those costs will fall as technology
allows. Robots can be directed by humans or made to learn and operate on their own. And they can
serve as personal assistants (e.g. Roomba vacuum or Paro companion robot seal), can be something we
wear or ride in (e.g. exoskeleton or Google’s self-driving car), or even something inside our bodies
(nano-scale bots in our blood stream).
The Brain-Computer Interface
The ability to sense electrical activity
of nerve endings is already leading to
advanced prosthetics for amputees
and so quadriplegics can control robot
arms just by thinking about it. A brain-
computer interface could also be used
to control an exoskeleton or robot,
and the military is already envisioning
soldiers with telepathic helmets by
2020.
So what might be the result of
converging Information and Cognitive
Computing? Futurist Ray Kurzweil has
studied this field and foresees a
supercomputer exceeding the computational and analytical power of the human brain this year, in 2013.
In many ways, IBM’s Watson already has. But by simply extrapolating Moore’s Law into the future,
Kurzweil predicts that by 2023, a $1,000 computer will have the power of the human brain and by 2037
a $0.01 computer will too. By 2049 (still possible in my lifetime), a $1,000 computer will exceed the
power of the human RACE, and ten years later a $0.01 computer will. Way before then we’ll see
improvements in the brain-computer interface, so changes in healthcare beyond 10-20 years get much
harder to imagine.
The Most Likely Inhibitors
As I mentioned at the beginning, politics and public policy can be either a huge driver of change or an
inhibitor. So what I worry about most is the corrupting power of big money in politics and special
interest lobbying. I’m appalled that most new bills today are drafted by corporate attorneys and not by
elected politicians. Then highly-paid lobbyists help push the bills through Congress to become law.
Steven Brill, in his 38-page special report for TIME Magazine, described an immensely profitable
healthcare industry that doesn’t want to change and spends twice as much on lobbying than the military
- 8. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 8
industrial complex. If proposals such as universal healthcare were to actually eliminate the need for
private health insurance and replace the profit motive with incentives to instead focus attention on
wellness and prevention and thus avoid the need for medical care in the first place, the nation could
easily save over $1 trillion per year. That’s each and every year, not spread over 10-20 years, and that
would be a lot of money NOT pouring into the healthcare industrial complex.
No wonder the hospitals, insurers,
drug companies, testing companies,
and equipment providers have been
fighting so hard to prevent real
health reforms. Doctors themselves
are less to blame, but even from their
first day in medical school, they too
have learned that preventative
medicine kills – it kills repeat
business, and profits.
Greed – and the widening gaps in
income, wealth and opportunity – is a
global problem, but it’s most
pronounced in the United States. And
unless we address this problem, we won’t be able to contain the rising healthcare costs and will
continue paying more than all other industrialized nations for inferior care overall. Sure, the wealthy will
get great care, but the others won’t.
About the Author
I want readers to know about the lens that makes up my perspective of healthcare and its future, so
here’s some quick background. I’m a retired IBM technologist, market strategist, futurist, consumer
advocate, and social entrepreneur. I started my professional career as a punch card operator with IBM
while still in college. I progressed through computer operator, application & systems programmer,
systems engineer, marketing support rep, and market strategist before retiring in 1999.
While I have no formal medical training, I have a fairly good basic understanding of the industry (not so
much medicine itself) from my work as an IBM Systems Engineer with large hospital accounts, where I
installed systems for patient accounting, patient care, pharmacy, and medical records. And I married a
registered nurse (RN, BSN).
I’ve always been interested in tech innovations and tend to think in IBM Scale, i.e. about big, multi-
billion dollar problems.
About Modern Health Talk
After retiring from IBM, running a digital home consulting firm, and co-founding a 501(c)(4) nonprofit
consumer advocacy firm representing homeowners in the Texas legislature, I started Modern Health
- 9. © 2013, Modern Health Talk Moore’s Law & the FUTURE of Health Care Page 9
Talk. I was looking for a compelling
intersection of industry trends and
market needs with my skills and
interests, and that’s exactly where
Modern Health Talk is positioned – at
the intersection of several industry
and market trends and positioned
between online support groups on
one side and technology websites on
the other.
It’s a content website and blog with
tools providing a personal
assessment and product
comparisons. There are lots and lots
of healthcare statistics, many of which are packaged in nearly 300 infographics, and there are well over
400 articles on topics ranging from health reform to low- and high-tech solutions for home healthcare
and aging-in-place.